Literature DB >> 27167308

Speech segmentation by statistical learning is supported by domain-general processes within working memory.

Shekeila D Palmer1, Sven L Mattys1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which working memory resources are recruited during statistical learning (SL). Participants were asked to identify novel words in an artificial speech stream where the transitional probabilities between syllables provided the only segmentation cue. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that segmentation performance improved when the speech rate was slowed down, suggesting that SL is supported by some form of active processing or maintenance mechanism that operates more effectively under slower presentation rates. In Experiment 3 we investigated the nature of this mechanism by asking participants to perform a two-back task while listening to the speech stream. Half of the participants performed a two-back rhyme task designed to engage phonological processing, whereas the other half performed a comparable two-back task on un-nameable visual shapes. It was hypothesized that if SL is dependent only upon domain-specific processes (i.e., phonological rehearsal), the rhyme task should impair speech segmentation performance more than the shape task. However, the two loads were equally disruptive to learning, as they both eradicated the benefit provided by the slow rate. These results suggest that SL is supported by working-memory processes that rely on domain-general resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phonological rehearsal; Speech segmentation; Statistical learning; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27167308     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  9 in total

Review 1.  Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Louisa Bogaerts; Morten H Christiansen; Ram Frost
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Second Language Experience Facilitates Statistical Learning of Novel Linguistic Materials.

Authors:  Christine E Potter; Tianlin Wang; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-18

3.  Statistical learning of speech regularities can occur outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  Laura J Batterink; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Katherine M Simeon; Hillary E Snyder; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  What Constitutes a Phrase in Sound-Based Music? A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Perception and Acoustics.

Authors:  Kirk N Olsen; Roger T Dean; Yvonne Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Musicians' Online Performance during Auditory and Visual Statistical Learning Tasks.

Authors:  Pragati R Mandikal Vasuki; Mridula Sharma; Ronny K Ibrahim; Joanne Arciuli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Voice modulatory cues to structure across languages and species.

Authors:  Theresa Matzinger; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Process reveals structure: How a network is traversed mediates expectations about its architecture.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Ari E Kahn; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Statistical learning for speech segmentation: Age-related changes and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Shekeila D Palmer; James Hutson; Sven L Mattys
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-09-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.