Katiah Llerena1, Jonathan K Wynn2, Greg Hajcak3, Michael F Green2, William P Horan2. 1. Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 22 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Bldg. 210, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA; UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: kllerena@ucla.edu. 2. Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 22 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Bldg. 210, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA; UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurately monitoring one's performance on daily life tasks, and integrating internal and external performance feedback are necessary for guiding productive behavior. Although internal feedback processing, as indexed by the error-related negativity (ERN), is consistently impaired in schizophrenia, initial findings suggest that external performance feedback processing, as indexed by the feedback negativity (FN), may actually be intact. The current study evaluated internal and external feedback processing task performance and test-retest reliability in schizophrenia. METHODS: 92 schizophrenia outpatients and 63 healthy controls completed a flanker task (ERN) and a time estimation task (FN). Analyses examined the ΔERN and ΔFN defined as difference waves between correct/positive versus error/negative feedback conditions. A temporal principal component analysis was conducted to distinguish the ΔERN and ΔFN from overlapping neural responses. We also assessed test-retest reliability of ΔERN and ΔFN in patients over a 4-week interval. RESULTS: Patients showed reduced ΔERN accompanied by intact ΔFN. In patients, test-retest reliability for both ΔERN and ΔFN over a four-week period was fair to good. CONCLUSION: Individuals with schizophrenia show a pattern of impaired internal, but intact external, feedback processing. This pattern has implications for understanding the nature and neural correlates of impaired feedback processing in schizophrenia. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Accurately monitoring one's performance on daily life tasks, and integrating internal and external performance feedback are necessary for guiding productive behavior. Although internal feedback processing, as indexed by the error-related negativity (ERN), is consistently impaired in schizophrenia, initial findings suggest that external performance feedback processing, as indexed by the feedback negativity (FN), may actually be intact. The current study evaluated internal and external feedback processing task performance and test-retest reliability in schizophrenia. METHODS: 92 schizophrenia outpatients and 63 healthy controls completed a flanker task (ERN) and a time estimation task (FN). Analyses examined the ΔERN and ΔFN defined as difference waves between correct/positive versus error/negative feedback conditions. A temporal principal component analysis was conducted to distinguish the ΔERN and ΔFN from overlapping neural responses. We also assessed test-retest reliability of ΔERN and ΔFN in patients over a 4-week interval. RESULTS:Patients showed reduced ΔERN accompanied by intact ΔFN. In patients, test-retest reliability for both ΔERN and ΔFN over a four-week period was fair to good. CONCLUSION: Individuals with schizophrenia show a pattern of impaired internal, but intact external, feedback processing. This pattern has implications for understanding the nature and neural correlates of impaired feedback processing in schizophrenia. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electroencephalography; Event related potentials; Performance monitoring; Principal component analysis; Reward; Schizophrenia
Authors: Sarah E Forster; Patrick Zirnheld; Anantha Shekhar; Stuart R Steinhauer; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Peter E Clayson; Jonathan K Wynn; Zachary P Infantolino; Greg Hajcak; Michael F Green; William P Horan Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2019-11
Authors: Elizabeth A Martin; Amanda McCleery; Melody M Moore; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green; William P Horan Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 2.997