Literature DB >> 27166250

An MCMC method for the evaluation of the Fisher information matrix for non-linear mixed effect models.

Marie-Karelle Riviere1, Sebastian Ueckert2, France Mentré2.   

Abstract

Non-linear mixed effect models (NLMEMs) are widely used for the analysis of longitudinal data. To design these studies, optimal design based on the expected Fisher information matrix (FIM) can be used instead of performing time-consuming clinical trial simulations. In recent years, estimation algorithms for NLMEMs have transitioned from linearization toward more exact higher-order methods. Optimal design, on the other hand, has mainly relied on first-order (FO) linearization to calculate the FIM. Although efficient in general, FO cannot be applied to complex non-linear models and with difficulty in studies with discrete data. We propose an approach to evaluate the expected FIM in NLMEMs for both discrete and continuous outcomes. We used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to integrate the derivatives of the log-likelihood over the random effects, and Monte Carlo to evaluate its expectation w.r.t. the observations. Our method was implemented in R using Stan, which efficiently draws MCMC samples and calculates partial derivatives of the log-likelihood. Evaluated on several examples, our approach showed good performance with relative standard errors (RSEs) close to those obtained by simulations. We studied the influence of the number of MC and MCMC samples and computed the uncertainty of the FIM evaluation. We also compared our approach to Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature, Laplace approximation, and FO. Our method is available in R-package MIXFIM and can be used to evaluate the FIM, its determinant with confidence intervals (CIs), and RSEs with CIs.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous data; Discrete data; Fisher information matrix; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Non-linear mixed effect models; Optimal design

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27166250     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  4 in total

1.  Individual Bayesian Information Matrix for Predicting Estimation Error and Shrinkage of Individual Parameters Accounting for Data Below the Limit of Quantification.

Authors:  Thi Huyen Tram Nguyen; Thu Thuy Nguyen; France Mentré
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Lessons learned from IDeAl - 33 recommendations from the IDeAl-net about design and analysis of small population clinical trials.

Authors:  Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Malgorzata Bogdan; Carl-Fredrik Burman; Holger Dette; Mats Karlsson; Franz König; Christoph Male; France Mentré; Geert Molenberghs; Stephen Senn
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 3.  Metaheuristics for pharmacometrics.

Authors:  Seongho Kim; Andrew C Hooker; Yu Shi; Grace Hyun J Kim; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-22

4.  Pharmacometric estimation methods for aggregate data, including data simulated from other pharmacometric models.

Authors:  Pyry Antti Juhana Välitalo
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.745

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.