Literature DB >> 27166180

Screening for enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in stool samples.

Jacqueline I Keenan1, Alan Aitchison2, Rachel V Purcell2, Rosie Greenlees3, John F Pearson4, Frank A Frizelle2.   

Abstract

Bacteroides fragilis is a commensal bacterium found in the gut of most humans, however enterotoxigenic B. fragilis strains (ETBF) have been associated with diarrhoea and colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to establish a method of screening for the Bacteroides fragilis toxin (bft) gene in stool samples, as a means of determining if carriage of ETBF is detected more often in CRC patients than in age-matched healthy controls. Stool samples from 71 patients recently diagnosed with CRC, and 71 age-matched controls, were screened by standard and quantitative PCR using primers specific for the detection of the bft gene. Bacterial template DNA from stool samples was prepared by two methods: a sweep, where all colonies growing on Bacteroides Bile Esculin agar following stool culture for 48 h at 37 °C in an anaerobic environment were swept into sterile water and heat treated; and a direct DNA extraction from each stool sample. The bft gene was detected more frequently from DNA isolated from bacterial sweeps than from matched direct DNA extractions. qPCR was found to be more sensitive than standard PCR in detecting bft. The cumulative total of positive qPCR assays from both sample types revealed that 19 of the CRC patients had evidence of the toxin gene in their stool sample (27%), compared to seven of the age-matched controls (10%). This difference was significant (P = 0.016). Overall, ETBF carriage was detected more often in CRC patient stool samples compared to controls, but disparate findings from the different DNA preparations and testing methods suggests that poor sensitivity may limit molecular detection of ETBF in stool samples.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis; PCR; Stool samples; bft gene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27166180     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  13 in total

1.  Transmission and clearance of potential procarcinogenic bacteria during fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Julia L Drewes; Alina Corona; Uriel Sanchez; Yunfan Fan; Suchitra K Hourigan; Melissa Weidner; Sarah D Sidhu; Patricia J Simner; Hao Wang; Winston Timp; Maria Oliva-Hemker; Cynthia L Sears
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-10-03

2.  Gastrointestinal (GI)-Tract Microbiome Derived Neurotoxins and their Potential Contribution to Inflammatory Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Authors:  Walter J Lukiw; Lisa Arceneaux; Wenhong Li; Taylor Bond; Yuhai Zhao
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 3.  Secretory Products of the Human GI Tract Microbiome and Their Potential Impact on Alzheimer's Disease (AD): Detection of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in AD Hippocampus.

Authors:  Yuhai Zhao; Vivian Jaber; Walter J Lukiw
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Gastrointestinal Pathobionts in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Rachel V Purcell; Nadeem O Kaakoush; Hazel M Mitchell; John F Pearson; Jacqueline I Keenan
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-17

5.  Comparison of standard, quantitative and digital PCR in the detection of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  Rachel V Purcell; John Pearson; Frank A Frizelle; Jacqueline I Keenan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  High-resolution bacterial 16S rRNA gene profile meta-analysis and biofilm status reveal common colorectal cancer consortia.

Authors:  Julia L Drewes; James R White; Christine M Dejea; Payam Fathi; Thevambiga Iyadorai; Jamuna Vadivelu; April C Roslani; Elizabeth C Wick; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Mun Fai Loke; Kumar Thulasi; Han Ming Gan; Khean Lee Goh; Hoong Yin Chong; Sandip Kumar; Jane W Wanyiri; Cynthia L Sears
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 7.290

Review 7.  Microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection and/or prognosis.

Authors:  Romain Villéger; Amélie Lopès; Julie Veziant; Johan Gagnière; Nicolas Barnich; Elisabeth Billard; Delphine Boucher; Mathilde Bonnet
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 8.  The promise and challenge of cancer microbiome research.

Authors:  Sumeed Syed Manzoor; Annemiek Doedens; Michael B Burns
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 9.  The Four Horsemen in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Hernández-Luna; Sergio López-Briones; Rosendo Luria-Pérez
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Toxigenic and non-toxigenic patterns I, II and III and biofilm-forming ability in Bacteroides fragilis strains isolated from patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Seyedesomaye Jasemi; Mohammad Emaneini; Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli; Zahra Ahmadinejad; Bizhan Nomanpour; Fatemah Sadeghpour Heravi; Leonardo A Sechi; Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.181

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.