Literature DB >> 2716557

The effectiveness of immediate feedback during the objective structured clinical examination.

R V Hodder1, R N Rivington, L E Calcutt, I R Hart.   

Abstract

Using eight different physical examination or technical stations, 400 examinations were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of immediate feedback during the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The test group comprised 50 medical students who underwent a standard 4-minute examination followed by 2 minutes of feedback. Immediately following feedback the students repeated an identical 4-minute examination scored by the same examiners. The control group consisted of 50 students from the same class who underwent an identical testing sequence, but instead of receiving feedback, they were instructed to continue their examinations for an additional 2 minutes before repeating the stations. Simple repetition of the task did not significantly improve score (mean increase 2.0%, NS). Extending the testing period from 4 to 6 minutes resulted in a small but significant increase in score (mean 6.7%, P less than 0.001). However, there was a much larger increase in the scores obtained following 2 minutes of immediate feedback compared to pre-feedback performance (mean 26.3%, P less than 0.0001). The majority of students and examiners felt that feedback, as administered in this study, was valuable both as a learning and teaching experience. Short periods of immediate feedback during an OSCE are practical and can improve competency in the performance of criterion-based tasks, at least over the short term. In addition, such feedback provides students with valuable self-assessment that may stimulate further learning.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2716557     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1989.tb00884.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  11 in total

1.  Resident training and the dictated operative report: a national perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence M Gillman; Ashley Vergis; Krista Hardy; Jason Park; Mark Taylor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Recent developments in assessing medical students.

Authors:  S L Fowell; J G Bligh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Improvement of Skills in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Pediatric Residents by Recorded Video Feedbacks.

Authors:  Nattachai Anantasit; Jarin Vaewpanich; Teeradej Kuptanon; Haruitai Kamalaporn; Anant Khositseth
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Teaching and assessing residents' skills in managing heroin addiction with objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs).

Authors:  Sharon J Parish; Melissa R Stein; Steven R Hahn; Uri Goldberg; Julia H Arnsten
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.716

5.  Benefits of a programme taking advantage of patient-instructors to teach and assess musculoskeletal skills in medical students.

Authors:  M Bideau; P-A Guerne; M-P Bianchi; P Huber
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Teaching about Substance Abuse with Objective Structured Clinical Exams.

Authors:  Sharon J Parish; Megha Ramaswamy; Melissa R Stein; Elizabeth K Kachur; Julia H Arnsten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nelson; Rebecca B Carlson; Amanda H Corbett; Dennis M Williams; Denise H Rhoney
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

8.  How well do second-year students learn physical diagnosis? Observational study of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Authors:  Claus Hamann; Kevin Volkan; Mary B Fishman; Ronald C Silvestri; Steven R Simon; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Beyond Reality-Extending a Presentation Trainer with an Immersive VR Module.

Authors:  Jan Schneider; Gianluca Romano; Hendrik Drachsler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  "Shadow" OSCE examiner. A cross-sectional study comparing the "shadow" examiner with the original OSCE examiner format.

Authors:  Marcelo Arlindo Vasconcelos Rodrigues; Rodrigo Diaz Olmos; Célia Maria Kira; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Itamar Souza Santos; Iolanda de Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.