| Literature DB >> 27165310 |
M G Frasch1,2,3,4,5, M Szynkaruk6, A P Prout6, K Nygard7, M Cao8,9, R Veldhuizen10, R Hammond11, B S Richardson6,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroinflammation in utero may contribute to brain injury resulting in life-long neurological disabilities. The pivotal role of the efferent cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) in controlling inflammation, e.g., by inhibiting the HMGB1 release, via the macrophages' α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) has been described in adults, but its importance in the fetus is unknown. Moreover, it is unknown whether CAP may also exert anti-inflammatory effects on the brain via the anatomically predominant afferent component of the vagus nerve.Entities:
Keywords: CHRNA7; Fetus; HMGB1; HRV; Labor; Microglia; RMSSD; Vagus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27165310 PMCID: PMC4894374 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-016-0567-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1a, b Fetal inflammatory response to acute hypoxic acidemia. *p < 0.05 versus baseline. pH nadir, at pH <7.00; recovery 1 and 24 h after the pH nadir. Median ± {5–95 %}. c IL-1β measured at baseline, pH nadir, and 1 h or recovery correlates to RMSSD (R = 0.57, p = 0.02, n = 17). Baseline values were chosen for lactate >1.5 mmol/l. d White matter microglia cell counts at 24 h recovery correlate to RMSSD at 1 h of recovery (R = 0.89, p = 0.03, n = 6)
Fig. 2a Presence of α7nAChR in near-term ovine brain was confirmed by Western blot. b Effect of UCO, microglia status and brain regions on HMGB1 translocation: significant group*brain region*microglia status interaction (p < 0.001). See Additional file 1: Table S1 for details. c Effect of UCO and microglia status on α7 nAChR immunofluorescence measured as intensity per area: significant group*microglia status*HMGB1 translocation interaction (p < 0.001). See Additional file 1: Table S2 for details. Note that, for α7 nAChR signal, between-brain region comparisons were not possible, because gain settings were optimized for each brain region and kept constant between cell compartment and groups (but not from region to region). HMGB1 signal is expressed as ratio of cytosolic to nuclear signal, i.e., the higher the ratio, the more HMGB1 translocation is observed; this normalization permits between-brain region comparisons
Fig. 3UCO group: HMGB1 and α7 nAChR immunofluorescence are shown, measured as intensities per area (I/A) in activated microglia (aMG) in relation to RMSSD as marker of CAP activity. RMSSD at 1 h recovery negatively correlates with cytoplasmic HMGB1 in thalamus a R = −0.94, p = 0.005. RMSSD at pH nadir positively correlates with α7 nAChR in the white matter b R = 0.83, p = 0.04
Fig. 4α7nAChR + HMGB1 + Iba1 + DAPI immunofluorescent staining: Red = Iba1; Blue = DAPI; Green = HMGB1; White = α7nAChR. Images were made from extended depth of focus, maximum intensity projections from convexial gray matter layers 4 to 6. Top: Features of active versus inactive microglia: Inactive cells have no interaction with neurons, are smaller, less bright, and less ramified versus the activated cells. Bottom: Co-localization staining for Iba1+ cells expressing α7nAChR with intracellular localization of HMGB1 and DAPI counterstain. a Iba1 + DAPI + α7nAChR; b Iba1 + DAPI + HMGB1; c Iba1+ α7nAChR; d best focus color composite of Iba1+ α7nAChR + HMGB1 + DAPI