Literature DB >> 27165148

Comparability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric short form symptom measures across culture: examination between Chinese and American children with cancer.

Yanyan Liu1, Changrong Yuan2, Jichuan Wang3,4, Jeanne Geiger Brown5, Fen Zhou6, Xiufang Zhao7, Min Shen8, Pamela S Hinds4,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric forms measure symptoms and function of pediatric patients experiencing chronic disease by using the same measures. Comparability is one of the most important purposes of the PROMIS initiative. This study aimed to test the factorial structures of four symptom measures (i.e., Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Pain Interference) in the original English and the Chinese versions and examine the measurement invariance of the measures across two cultures.
METHODS: Four PROMIS Pediatric measures were used to assess symptoms, respectively, in Chinese (n = 232) and American (n = 200) children and adolescents (8-17 years old) in treatment for cancer or in survivorship. The categorical confirmatory factor analysis (CCFA) model was used to examine factorial structures, and multigroup CCFA was applied to test measurement invariance of these measures between the Chinese and American samples.
RESULTS: The CCFA models of the four PROMIS Pediatric symptom measures fit the data well for both the Chinese and American children and adolescents. Minor partial measurement invariance was identified. Factor means and factor variances of the four PROMIS measures were not significantly different between the two populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence that the four PROMIS Pediatric symptom measures have valid factorial structures and a statistical property of measurement invariance across American and Chinese children and adolescents with cancer. This means that the items of these measures were interpreted in a conceptually similar manner by two groups. They could be readily used for meaningful cross-cultural comparisons involving pediatric oncology patients in these two countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Categorical confirmatory factor analysis (CCFA); Culture; Measurement invariance; PROMIS; Pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27165148     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1312-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  28 in total

Review 1.  Measuring physical symptoms in children and adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  Lauri A Linder
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Validity and reliability of a new instrument to measure cancer-related fatigue in adolescents.

Authors:  Pamela S Hinds; Marilyn Hockenberry; Xin Tong; Shesh N Rai; Jamie S Gattuso; Kathleen McCarthy; Ching-Hon Pui; Deo Kumar Srivastava
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief: measurement invariant across European countries.

Authors:  Nancy E Van Loey; Rens Van de Schoot; Bengt Gerdin; Albertus W Faber; Folke Sjöberg; Mimmie Willebrand
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey.

Authors:  Debra E Irwin; Brian D Stucky; David Thissen; Esi Morgan Dewitt; Jin Shei Lai; Karin Yeatts; James W Varni; Darren A DeWalt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory.

Authors:  Esi Morgan DeWitt; Brian D Stucky; David Thissen; Debra E Irwin; Michelle Langer; James W Varni; Jin-Shei Lai; Karin B Yeatts; Darren A Dewalt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: an item response analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression short forms.

Authors:  Yanyan Liu; Jingting Wang; Pamela S Hinds; Jichuan Wang; Nanping Shen; Xiufang Zhao; Jian Ding; Changrong Yuan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Feasibility and acceptability of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system measures in children and adolescents in active cancer treatment and survivorship.

Authors:  Johanna C Menard; Pamela S Hinds; Shana S Jacobs; Katie Cranston; Jichuan Wang; Darren A DeWalt; Heather E Gross
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 10.  Literature review: health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: hearing the voices of the children.

Authors:  James W Varni; Christine Limbers; Tasha M Burwinkle
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2007-03-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Preliminary evaluation of the Chinese version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in patients with aortic dissection.

Authors:  Wanbing Huang; Qiansheng Wu; Yufen Zhang; Chong Tian; Haishan Huang; Sufang Huang; Yanrong Zhou; Jing He; Hui Wang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  How Long Does It Take for Patients to Complete PROMIS Scores?: An Assessment of PROMIS CAT Questionnaires Administered at an Ambulatory Sports Medicine Clinic.

Authors:  Omar Kadri; Toufic R Jildeh; Jason E Meldau; Jacob Blanchett; Peter Borowsky; Stephanie Muh; Vasilios Moutzouros; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.