Literature DB >> 27165034

[Anesthetic management during pheochromocytoma surgery : Current strategies].

B J Nottebaum1, H Groeben2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery-related mortality in patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma has dramatically decreased over the last few decades. This effect has often been attributed to perioperative α‑receptor blockade. However, this has never been tested in a randomized trial and many other changes have contributed to this improvement. At the same time α‑receptor blockade was introduced, short-acting and well controllable agents became available for intraoperative arterial blood pressure management. Subsequently, surgical techniques improved and led almost exclusively to minimally invasive techniques, while improvements in the diagnostic techniques allow earlier and more precise detection of catecholamine-producing tumors.
METHODS: Conduction of a randomized, controlled study to investigate the effect of α‑receptor blockade on mortality is hampered by the rarity of the disease. With the currently low mortality rate, several thousands of patients would be needed to test such a hypothesis. Accordingly, intraoperative management is generally based on expert opinion. Hypertensive episodes are treated by intravenous administration of sodium nitroprusside, urapidil or nitroglycerine. Depending on the individual case a short-acting β‑blocker and magnesium might be added. Hypotension following tumor removal is treated with intravenous fluid infusion and continuous norepinephrine administration. Adrenal gland-sparing resection of pheochromocytoma does not seem to increase the risk of arterial hypertension.
CONCLUSION: Future research should focus on identification of risk factors for intraoperative hypertensive episodes and the question whether a time-consuming, unreliable α‑receptor blockade, burdened with significant side effects, is still needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha-receptor blockade; Blood pressure control; Hypotension; Paraganglioma; Sodium nitroprusside

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27165034     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0082-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Benign and malignant pheochromocytoma].

Authors:  H Lehnert; K Hahn; H Dralle
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  The effect of calcium channel blockers on outcome following the surgical treatment of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Authors:  G Lebuffe; E D Dosseh; G Tek; H Tytgat; S Moreno; B Tavernier; B Vallet; C A G Proye
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Sometimes too much of a good thing may not be that good.

Authors:  Juraj Sprung; Toby N Weingarten
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Richard Hodin; Carrie Lubitz; Roy Phitayakorn; Antonia Stephen
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Comparison of two preoperative medical management strategies for laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Toby N Weingarten; Juan P Cata; Jerome F O'Hara; David J Prybilla; Tasha L Pike; Geoffrey B Thompson; Clive S Grant; David O Warner; Emmanuel Bravo; Juraj Sprung
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Both preoperative alpha and calcium channel blockade impact intraoperative hemodynamic stability similarly in the management of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Laurent Brunaud; Myriam Boutami; Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi; Brendan Finnerty; Adeline Germain; Georges Weryha; Thomas J Fahey; Eric Mirallie; Laurent Bresler; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Perioperative management of 63 patients with pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  A R Boutros; E L Bravo; G Zanettin; R A Straffon
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Successful outcomes in pheochromocytoma surgery in the modern era.

Authors:  J C Ulchaker; D A Goldfarb; E L Bravo; A C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Predictors of hemodynamic instability during surgery for pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Colleen M Kiernan; Liping Du; Xi Chen; James T Broome; Chanjuan Shi; Mary F Peters; Carmen C Solorzano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Risk Factors for Hemodynamic Instability during Surgery for Pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  H Bruynzeel; R A Feelders; T H N Groenland; A H van den Meiracker; C H J van Eijck; J F Lange; W W de Herder; G Kazemier
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.