| Literature DB >> 27165026 |
N Piaskowska1, T Daszkiewicz1, D Kubiak1, P Zapotoczny2.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of vacuum and modified atmosphere (40% CO2+60% N2, MA) packaging on the chemical composition, physicochemical properties and sensory attributes of chill-stored meat from 10 fallow deer (Dama dama) bucks at 17 to 18 months of age. The animals were hunter-harvested in the forests of north-eastern Poland. During carcass dressing (48 to 54 h post mortem), both musculus longissimus muscles were cut out. Each muscle was divided into seven sections which were allocated to three groups: 0, A, and B. Samples 0 were immediately subjected to laboratory analyses. Samples A were vacuum-packaged, and samples B were packaged in MA. Packaged samples were stored for 7, 14, and 21 days at 2°C. The results of the present study showed that the evaluated packaging systems had no significant effect on the quality of fallow deer meat during chilled storage. However, vacuum-packaged meat samples were characterised by greater drip loss. Vacuum and MA packaging contributed to preserving the desired physicochemical properties and sensory attributes of meat during 21 days of storage. Regardless of the packaging method used, undesirable changes in the colour, water-holding capacity and juiciness of meat, accompanied by tenderness improvement, were observed during chilled storage.Entities:
Keywords: Meat Quality; Modified Atmosphere; Storage Time; Vacuum; Wild Fallow Deer
Year: 2016 PMID: 27165026 PMCID: PMC5088428 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.15.1016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Meat weight losses and proximate chemical composition of meat after modified atmosphere storage
| Parameter | Modified atmosphere | Storage time (d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | ||
| Weight loss (%) | Vacuum | 3.17±0.85 | 3.97±0.99 | 4.02±0.90 | |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 1.86±0.33 | 2.04±0.41 | 2.38±0.82 | ||
| Dry matter content (g/kg) | Vacuum | 258.10±3.90 | 255.20±4.30 | 255.50±3.90 | 255.70±3.60 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 258.10±3.90 | 255.90±5.00 | 255.00±2.40 | 255.70±2.70 | |
| Total protein content (g/kg) | Vacuum | 228.40±3.60 | 228.60±4.00 | 226.20±2.80 | 228.10±6.80 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 228.40±3.60 | 229.40±3.70 | 228.10±2.60 | 229.10±4.10 | |
| Fat content (g/kg) | Vacuum | 5.20±1.40 | 4.10±2.10 | 4.90±2.30 | 6.50±1.60 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 5.20±1.40 | 4.50±1.80 | 4.60±1.70 | 6.90±2.40 | |
| Ash content (g/kg) | Vacuum | 11.30±0.70 | 10.40±0.50 | 11.00±0.30 | 10.60±0.30 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 11.30±0.70 | 10.80±0.50 | 10.80±0.50 | 10.70±0.30 | |
Values represent mean±standard deviation.
Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).
Values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).
Nitrogen fractions in meat after modified atmosphere storage
| Parameter | Modified atmosphere | Storage time (d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | ||
| The ratio between total N of water-soluble compounds | Vacuum | 28.91±2.15 | 29.18±1.43 | 29.62±1.30 | 29.02±2.26 |
| and total N in in meat (%) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 28.91±2.15 | 29.07±1.80 | 29.38±1.99 | 29.27±1.99 |
| The ratio between N of water-soluble protein | Vacuum | 15.37±1.52 | 14.77±0.71 | 14.73±0.93 | 13.82±1.41 |
| compounds and total N in meat (%) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 15.37±1.52 | 15.02±1.33 | 14.86±1.35 | 13.76±0.95 |
| The ratio between N of water-soluble non-protein | Vacuum | 13.54±0.93 | 14.41±1.01 | 14.89±1.03 | 15.20±1.38 |
| compounds and total N in meat (%) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 13.54±0.93 | 14.05±0.65 | 14.53±0.71 | 15.50±1.26 |
| The ratio between N of water-soluble protein | Vacuum | 53.11±2.11 | 50.64±1.68 | 49.74±2.42 | 47.59±2.93 |
| compounds and total N of water-soluble compounds (%) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 53.11±2.11 | 51.61±1.78 | 50.49±1.47 | 47.06±1.58 |
| The ratio between N of water-soluble non-protein | Vacuum | 46.89±2.11 | 49.36±1.68 | 50.26±2.42 | 52.41±2.93 |
| compounds and total N of water-soluble compounds (%) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 46.89±2.11 | 48.39±1.78 | 49.51±1.47 | 52.94±1.58 |
Values represent mean±standard deviation.
Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).
pH, TBARS values and colour parameters of meat after modified atmosphere storage
| Parameter | Modified atmosphere | Storage time (d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | ||
| pH | Vacuum | 5.52±0.04 | 5.55±0.03 | 5.59±0.03 | 5.61±0.06 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 5.52±0.04 | 5.55±0.04 | 5.58±0.04 | 5.61±0.07 | |
| TBARS values (mg/kg) | Vacuum | 0.76±0.11 | 0.78±0.14 | 0.70±0.15 | 0.77±0.10 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 0.76±0.11 | 0.83±0.18 | 0.72±0.12 | 0.82±0.13 | |
| Vacuum | 30.26±1.84 | 31.55±1.42 | 31.99±1.42 | 31.29±1.35 | |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 30.85±1.90 | 31.30±1.70 | 31.85±1.44 | 31.51±1.35 | |
| Vacuum | 15.79±1.41 | 17.10±1.37 | 16.26±0.80 | 16.33±2.26 | |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 16.28±1.58 | 16.81±1.41 | 16.32±3.15 | 17.14±1.99 | |
| Vacuum | 10.58±1.44 | 12.29±1.41 | 11.98±0.90 | 11.22±1.93 | |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 11.14±1.69 | 14.44±6.57 | 12.05±1.96 | 12.22±1.70 | |
| C* | Vacuum | 19.01±1.95 | 21.06±1.89 | 20.20±1.14 | 19.82±2.92 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 19.73±2.25 | 22.54±5.09 | 20.30±3.57 | 21.06±2.57 | |
TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances expressed as milligrams of malondialdehyde per kilogram of meat.
Values represent mean±standard deviation.
Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).
L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness; C*, chroma.
Evaluation of water-holding capacity of meat after modified atmosphere storage
| Parameter | Modified atmosphere | Storage time (d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | ||
| Drip losses (%) | Vacuum | 2.99±0.96 | 3.14±0.67 | 2.43±0.66 | 2.24±0.58 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 2.99±0.96 | 2.82±0.93 | 2.30±0.58 | 2.25±0.46 | |
| Water-holding capacity | Vacuum | 5.31±0.80 | 4.64±0.96 | 3.52±0.36 | 3.68±1.00 |
| - Grau and Hamm method (cm2) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 5.31±0.80 | 4.54±0.88 | 3.69±1.03 | 3.58±1.05 |
| Cooking losses (%) | Vacuum | 33.65±1.54 | 33.59±1.43 | 33.76±1.85 | 33.68±1.38 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 33.65±1.54 | 33.51±0.82 | 33.05±2.41 | 33.98±0.89 | |
| Water-holding capacity | Vacuum | 27.71±6.55 | 36.01±12.03 | 26.62±3.42 | 21.15±6.20 |
| - centrifugal method (%) | 40% CO2+60% N2 | 27.71±6.55 | 34.29±10.40 | 25.66±3.89 | 24.72±11.92 |
Values represent mean±standard deviation.
Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).
Sensory properties (points) and shear force (N) of meat after modified atmosphere storage
| Parameter | Modified atmosphere | Storage time (d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | ||
| Aroma-intensity | Vacuum | 4.00±0.79 | 4.28±0.67 | 4.50±0.56 | 4.56±0.68 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 4.00±0.79 | 3.67±0.66 | 3.89±0.42 | 4.06±0.46 | |
| Aroma-desirability | Vacuum | 4.89±0.22 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.94±0.17 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 4.89±0.22 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.94±0.17 | 5.00±0.00 | |
| Taste-intensity | Vacuum | 4.17±0.35 | 4.06±0.39 | 4.17±0.25 | 4.17±0.35 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 4.17±0.35 | 4.00±0.35 | 4.11±0.22 | 4.00±0.00 | |
| Taste-desirability | Vacuum | 4.83±0.25 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.89±0.22 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 4.83±0.25 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.94±0.17 | 4.89±0.22 | |
| Juiciness | Vacuum | 4.00±0.50 | 3.72±0.57 | 3.72±0.36 | 3.44±0.30 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 4.00±0.50 | 3.78±0.62 | 3.94±0.30 | 3.67±0.35 | |
| Tenderness | Vacuum | 3.83±0.56 | 4.11±0.33 | 4.22±0.57 | 4.61±0.70 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 3.83±0.56 | 4.22±0.44 | 4.33±0.25 | 4.89±0.22 | |
| Shear force | Vacuum | 22.95±5.70 | 20.91±6.85 | 18.85±5.90 | 18.06±3.48 |
| 40% CO2+60% N2 | 22.95±5.70 | 20.12±3.19 | 18.60±2.56 | 17.89 ±1.41 | |
Values represent mean±standard deviation.
Values in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).
Values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (p≤0.05).