| Literature DB >> 27165024 |
Thien Truong Giang Nguyen1, Metha Wanapat1, Kampanat Phesatcha1, Sungchhang Kang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Leucaena leucocephala (Leucaena) is a perennial tropical legume that can be directly grazed or harvested and offered to ruminants as hay, silage, or fresh. However, Leucaena contain phenolic compounds, which are considered anti-nutritional factors as these may reduce intake, digestibility and thus animal performance. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to determine effects of Leucaena silage (LS) feeding levels on rumen microbial populations, N-balance and microbial protein synthesis in dairy steers.Entities:
Keywords: Dairy Steers; Leucaena Silage; Microbial Population; Microbial Protein Synthesis; Rice Straw
Year: 2016 PMID: 27165024 PMCID: PMC5205604 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.15.0948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Feed ingredients and estimated chemical compositions of dietary treatments used in the experiment
| Items | Concentrate | Rice straw | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (%) | |||
| Rice bran | 13.7 | ||
| Coconut meal | 10.0 | ||
| Palm kernel meal | 9.0 | ||
| Cassava chip | 69.0 | ||
| Urea | 2.5 | ||
| Molasses | 3.0 | ||
| Salt | 1.0 | ||
| Sulfur | 0.5 | ||
| Premix | 1.0 | ||
| Chemical composition (%) | |||
| Dry matter | 89.5 | 89.7 | 30.3 |
| ———% DM——— | |||
| Organic matter | 93.6 | 88.6 | 90.9 |
| Crude protein | 13.9 | 2.4 | 25.1 |
| Neural detergent fiber | 19.3 | 78.9 | 36.2 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 9.5 | 62.5 | 21.4 |
| Condensed tannins | - | - | 2.8 |
Effect of Leucaena silage feeding levels on total direct count of bacteria, protozoa and anaerobic fungi in dairy steers
| Direct count (cells/mL) | RST | RLS30 | RLS60 | LS | SEM | Significant level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria (×1010) | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 2.2 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 2.8 | 0.56 | * |
| 4 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 0.52 | * |
| Mean | 3.6 | 4.7 | 5.9 | 4.2 | 0.48 | * |
| Protozoa (×105) | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 6.1 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 0.44 | * |
| 4 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 0.59 | * |
| Mean | 7.2 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 0.46 | * |
| Fungal zoospore (×104) | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 1.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.29 | * |
| 4 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 0.31 | * |
| Mean | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 0.26 | * |
Condensed tannins intake in each treatments was 0.0, 28.6, 62.2, and 92.4 g/head/d for RST, RLS30, RLS60, and LS, respectively: RST, rice straw; RLS30, 70% rice straw+30% Leucaena silage; RLS60, 40% rice straw+60% Leucaena silage; LS, 100% Leucaena silage; SEM, standard error of the means.
Means in the same row with different superscript differ (* p<0.05).
Effects of Leucaena silage feeding levels on viable bacteria by using roll-tube technique in dairy steers
| Viable bacteria (cfu/mL) | RST | RLS30 | RLS60 | LS | SEM | Significant level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amylolytic (×107) | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.48 | ns |
| 4 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.61 | ns |
| Mean | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.50 | ns |
| Proteolytic (×107) | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 0.40 | * |
| 4 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 0.35 | * |
| Mean | 2.6 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.32 | * |
| Cellulolytic (×108) | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 3.0 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 0.44 | * |
| 4 | 4.4 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 4.7 | 0.36 | * |
| Mean | 3.6 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 0.35 | * |
Condensed tannins intake in each treatments was 0.0, 28.6, 62.2, and 92.4 g/head/d for RST, RLS30, RLS60, and LS, respectively: RST, rice straw; RLS30, 70% rice straw+30% Leucaena silage; RLS60, 40% rice straw+60% Leucaena silage; LS, 100% Leucaena silage; ns, non-significantly different; SEM, standard error of the means.
Means in the same row with different superscript differ (* p<0.05).
Effect of Leucaena silage feeding levels on nitrogen utilization and urinary purine derivatives in dairy steers
| Items | RST | RLS30 | RLS60 | LS | SEM | Significant level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen (g/d) | ||||||
| Intake | 17.8 | 52.5 | 94.4 | 125.8 | 1.81 | ** |
| Fecal | 8.5 | 18.0 | 24.0 | 50.9 | 1.77 | ** |
| Urine | 4.6 | 11.1 | 16.2 | 30.0 | 1.64 | ** |
| Absorption | 9.4 | 34.6 | 70.4 | 75.0 | 1.67 | ** |
| Retention | 4.8 | 23.5 | 54.2 | 45.0 | 2.00 | ** |
| Urinary purine derivatives (mmol/d) | ||||||
| Allantoin excretion | 44.0 | 66.5 | 84.8 | 58.5 | 1.28 | * |
| Allantoin absorption | 30.2 | 56.9 | 77.2 | 47.6 | 1.57 | * |
| MN supply (g/d) | 22.0 | 41.3 | 56.1 | 34.6 | 1.34 | * |
| EMNS (g/kg OMDR) | 27.2 | 36.8 | 40.7 | 32.1 | 1.48 | * |
Condensed tannins intake in each treatments was 0.0, 28.6, 62.2, and 92.4 g/head/d for RST, RLS30, RLS60, and LS, respectively: RST, rice straw; RLS30, 70% rice straw+30% Leucaena silage; RLS60, 40% rice straw+60% Leucaena silage; LS, 100% Leucaena silage; SEM, standard error of the means; MN, microbial nitrogen supply; EMNS, efficiency of microbial N synthesis (g/kg of organic matter digested in the rumen); OMDR, organic matter digestibility in the rumen (assuming that rumen digestion was 650 g/kg dry matter of organic matter digestibility in total tract).
Means in the same row with different superscript differ (* p<0.05), (** p<0.01).