| Literature DB >> 27165016 |
José Ortiz1, Martín Montaño1, Alejandro Plascencia1, Jaime Salinas2, Noemí Torrentera1, Richard A Zinn3.
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to examine the influence of kaolinite clay supplementation (0%, 1%, or 2% diet dry matter [DM] basis) on characteristics of digestion (Trial 1) and growth performance (Trial 2) in calf-fed Holstein steers fed a finishing diet. In Trial 1, 6 Holstein steers (539±15 kg) with ruminal and duodenal cannulas were used to evaluate treatment effects on characteristics of digestion. Kaolinite clay supplementation decreased total tract DM digestion (linear effect, p<0.01) without effects (p≥0.10) on site and extent of digestion of organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, starch and N, or ruminal microbial efficiency. There were no treatment effects on ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids molar proportions or estimated methane production. In Trial 2, 108 Holstein steers (132.4±5.6 kg) were used in a 308-d study to evaluate growth performance and carcass characteristics. There were no treatment effects (p>0.10) on average daily gain (ADG) and gain efficiency (ADG/dry matter intake). Kaolinite supplementation tended (linear effect, p = 0.08) to increase dietary net energy (NE) during the initial 112-d period. However, the overall (308-d) effect of supplementation dietary NE was not appreciable (p>0.20). However, due to the inertness of kaolinite, itself, the ratio of observed-to-expected dietary NE increased with kaolinite supplementation. This effect was more pronounced (linear effect, p 0.03) during the initial 224 d of the study. Overall (308 d), kaolinite supplementation tended to increase (linear effect, p = 0.07) dietary NE by 3% over expected. Kaolinite supplementation did not affect carcass weight, yield grade, longissimus area, kidney, pelvic and heart fat, and quality grade, but decreased (linear effect, p = 0.01) dressing percentage. It is concluded that kaolinite supplementation up to 2% of diet DM may enhance energetic efficiency of calf-fed Holstein steers in a manner independent of changes in characteristics of ruminal and total tract digestion.Entities:
Keywords: Cattle; Digestion; Feedlot; Growth; Kaolinite; Supplementation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27165016 PMCID: PMC5088376 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Composition of experimental diets fed to steers (DM basis)
| Item | Kaolinite level (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Ingredient composition (%) | |||
| Steam-flaked corn | 67.53 | 66.53 | 65.53 |
| Distillers dried grains plus solubles | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Sudan grass hay | 12.00 | 12.00 | 12.00 |
| Molasses cane | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Yellow grease | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Urea | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Limestone | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Magnesium oxide | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Trace mineral salt | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Kaolinite clay | - | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Monensin (g/T) | 35.00 | 35.00 | 35.00 |
| Nutrient composition (DM basis) | |||
| Net energy (Mcal/kg) | |||
| Maintenance | 2.21 | 2.19 | 2.17 |
| Gain | 1.54 | 1.53 | 1.51 |
| Crude protein (%) | 14.0 | 13.9 | 13.8 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Potassium (%) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| Magnesium (%) | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Sulfur (%) | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
DM, dry matter.
Trace mineral salt contained (%): CoSO4, 0.068; CuSO4, 1.04; FeSO4, 3.57; ZnO, 1.24; MnSO4, 1.07; KI, 0.052; NaCl, 92.96.
Based on tabular values for individual feed ingredients (NRC, 1996).
Influence of supplementation level of kaolinite clay on characteristics of apparent ruminal and total tract digestion in Holstein steers
| Item | Kaolinite level (% diet DM) | SEM | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Steer replicates | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
| Intake (g/d) | ||||||
| DM | 10,278 | 10,278 | 10,278 | |||
| OM | 9,606 | 9,606 | 9,605 | |||
| NDF | 1,595 | 1,661 | 1,728 | |||
| N | 213 | 212 | 211 | |||
| Starch | 5,371 | 5,298 | 5,225 | |||
| Flow to duodenum, g/d | ||||||
| OM | 5,250 | 5,036 | 5,392 | 151 | 0.53 | 0.16 |
| NDF | 1,059 | 958 | 1,053 | 60 | 0.94 | 0.22 |
| Starch | 955 | 993 | 1123 | 88 | 0.21 | 0.69 |
| Non-ammonia N | 239 | 235 | 236 | 9.5 | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| Microbial N | 140 | 145 | 141 | 5.6 | 0.85 | 0.59 |
| Feed N | 77 | 68 | 72 | 8.0 | 0.72 | 0.52 |
| Ruminal digestion (%) | ||||||
| OM | 59.91 | 62.64 | 58.57 | 1.50 | 0.54 | 0.10 |
| NDF | 33.26 | 41.99 | 30.31 | 3.48 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| Starch | 82.22 | 81.27 | 78.55 | 1.65 | 0.15 | 0.67 |
| Feed N | 64.15 | 68.00 | 65.61 | 3.79 | 0.79 | 0.52 |
| MN efficiency | 24.47 | 24.19 | 25.29 | 1.23 | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| N efficiency | 1.12 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.05 | 0.96 | 0.82 |
| Fecal excretion (g/d) | ||||||
| DM | 2,392 | 2,648 | 2,684 | 52 | <0.01 | 0.12 |
| OM | 1,969 | 2,099 | 2,096 | 56 | 0.15 | 0.36 |
| NDF | 913 | 972 | 965 | 40 | 0.39 | 0.53 |
| Starch | 86.9 | 83.6 | 88.7 | 16.4 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| N | 60.1 | 64.3 | 64.2 | 2.6 | 0.29 | 0.52 |
| Total tract digestion (%) | ||||||
| DM | 76.7 | 74.3 | 73.9 | 0.5 | <0.01 | 0.13 |
| OM | 79.5 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 0.37 |
| NDF | 42.7 | 41.0 | 44.2 | 2.4 | 0.68 | 0.44 |
| Starch | 98.4 | 98.4 | 98.3 | 0.3 | 0.88 | 0.84 |
| N | 71.8 | 69.7 | 69.5 | 1.2 | 0.21 | 0.53 |
DM, dry matter; SEM, standard error of the mean; OM, organic matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; MN, microbial N.
Microbial nitrogen, g/kg organic matter fermented.
Non-ammonia nitrogen flow to the small intestine as a fraction of nitrogen intake.
Influence of supplementation level of kaolinite clay on ruminal pH, volatile fatty acid profile and estimate methane production
| Item | Kaolinite level (% diet DM) | SEM | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Ruminal pH | 5.87 | 5.74 | 5.86 | 0.09 | 0.94 | 0.30 |
| Ruminal VFA (mol/100 mol) | ||||||
| Acetate | 53.2 | 50.8 | 50.8 | 1.8 | 0.52 | 0.19 |
| Propionate | 36.6 | 36.6 | 35.8 | 2.8 | 0.83 | 0.91 |
| Butyrate | 10.2 | 12.6 | 9.4 | 1.8 | 0.75 | 0.24 |
| Acetate/propionate | 1.61 | 1.53 | 1.63 | 0.17 | 0.95 | 0.68 |
| Estimated methane | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
DM, dry matter; SEM, standard error of the mean; VFA, volatile fatty acids.
Measured at 4-h posprandium (morning meal).
Estimated methane based on VFA molar proportions as mol/mol glucose equivalent fermented (Wolin, 1960).
Influence of supplementation level of kaolinite clay on growth performance of feedlot steers
| Item | Kaolinite level (% diet DM) | SEM | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Linear | Quadraticc | ||
| Days on test | 308 | 308 | 308 | |||
| Pen replicates | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
| Live weight (kg) | ||||||
| Initial | 132.4 | 132.3 | 132.5 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.92 |
| Final | 576.8 | 584.1 | 580.09 | 4.83 | 0.56 | 0.39 |
| ADG (kg) | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.73 |
| 112 to224 d | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 0.02 | 0.99 | 1.0 |
| 224 to 308 d | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.40 | 0.04 | 0.93 | 0.13 |
| 1 to 308 d | 1.44 | 1.47 | 1.46 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.40 |
| DMI (kg/d) | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 5.42 | 5.35 | 5.43 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0.25 |
| 112 to 224 d | 8.31 | 8.18 | 8.32 | 0.11 | 0.98 | 0.32 |
| 224 to 308 d | 10.45 | 10.67 | 10.44 | 0.11 | 0.55 | 0.06 |
| 1 to 308 d | 7.82 | 7.83 | 7.85 | 0.05 | 0.70 | 0.99 |
| ADG/DMI (kg/kg) | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 0.257 | 0.262 | 0.263 | 0.002 | 0.59 | 0.377 |
| 112 to 224 d | 0.184 | 0.187 | 0.184 | 0.002 | 0.97 | 0.222 |
| 224 to 308 d | 0.135 | 0.138 | 0.134 | 0.003 | 0.87 | 0.349 |
| 1 to 308 d | 0.185 | 0.187 | 0.186 | 0.001 | 0.62 | 0.205 |
| Dietary NE (Mcal/kg) | ||||||
| Maintenance | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 2.06 | 2.09 | 2.10 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.38 |
| 112 to224 d | 2.18 | 2.21 | 2.19 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.23 |
| 224 to 308 d | 2.12 | 2.13 | 2.11 | 0.03 | 0.97 | 0.64 |
| 1 to 308 d | 2.15 | 2.18 | 2.16 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.21 |
| Gain | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 1.40 | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.38 |
| 112 to224 d | 1.50 | 1.53 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.23 |
| 224 to 308 d | 1.45 | 1.46 | 1.44 | 0.03 | 0.97 | 0.64 |
| 1 to 308 d | 1.47 | 1.50 | 1.48 | 0.01 | 0.58 | 0.21 |
| Observed:expected dietary NE | ||||||
| Maintenance | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.006 | <0.01 | 0.41 |
| 112 to224 d | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.008 | 0.03 | 0.24 |
| 224 to 308 d | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.014 | 0.32 | 0.66 |
| 1 to 308 d | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.007 | 0.07 | 0.22 |
| Gain | ||||||
| 1 to 112 d | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.008 | <0.01 | 0.41 |
| 112 to224 d | 0.98 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.011 | 0.03 | 0.24 |
| 224 to 308 d | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.018 | 0.33 | 0.66 |
| 1 to 308 d | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.009 | 0.07 | 0.22 |
DM, dry matter; SEM, standard error of the mean; ADG, average daily gain; DMI, dry matter intake; NE, net energy.
Initial weight is the shrunk off truck arrival weight. Interim and final weights were reduced 4% to account for digestive tract fill.
Final shrunk weight was adjusted for carcass weight by dividing the carcass weight by the decimal fraction of the average dressing percentage (0.618).
Influence of supplementation level of kaolinite clay on carcass characteristics of Holstein steers
| Item | Kaolinite level (% diet DM) | SEM | Contrast p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Pen replicates | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
| Hot carcass weight (kg) | 356.25 | 360.8 | 358.8 | 3.0 | 0.56 | 0.39 |
| Dressing percentage | 62.1 | 61.8 | 61.4 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.90 |
| Longissimus area (cm2) | 77.6 | 80.4 | 79.9 | 2.8 | 0.56 | 0.64 |
| Fat thickness (cm) | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 0.07 |
| KPH (%) | 2.43 | 2.39 | 2.45 | 0.05 | 0.77 | 0.45 |
| Yield grade (%) | 51.8 | 52.1 | 52.0 | 0.3 | 0.64 | 0.72 |
| Quality grade | 4.93 | 5.08 | 4.73 | 0.22 | 0.52 | 0.37 |
DM, dry matter; SEM, standard error of the mean; KPH, kidney, pelvic and heart fat; LM, lgissimus.
Kidney, pelvic, and heart fat as a percentage of carcass weight.
Assessment of external 12th-rib fat thickness, KPH, LM area, lean and skeletal maturity, lean color, and marbling were used to determine a quality and yield grade for each carcass (USDA, 1997).