Literature DB >> 27164976

[Influence of registries on the quality of care].

D Stengel1,2, K Dreinhöfer3, T Kostuj4.   

Abstract

Registries are a topic of lively debate amongst all stakeholders in healthcare, politics and economics. In general, registries are national or international (prospective) databases documenting the current state of diagnostic, therapeutic and long-term outcome variables of subjects with a distinct condition or health problem. The access to and handling of registry information is subject to strict legal, methodological and ethical principles and regulations before these data can be scientifically utilized and reentered into the routine daily practice. Because of the representativeness and reality of data, registries are widely regarded as the backbone of health systems and budgets.Currently there is only indirect evidence that registries influence outcomes and the quality of care. Recent statistical techniques may allow quasi-experimental modelling of observational information. In orthopedic and trauma surgery, current and upcoming registries should be wisely utilized to develop and evaluate innovations and to make informed decisions relevant to care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Database; Decision making; Health care; Outcomes; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27164976     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-016-0170-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  11 in total

1.  [Memorandum registry for health services research].

Authors:  D Müller; M Augustin; N Banik; W Baumann; K Bestehorn; J Kieschke; R Lefering; B Maier; S Mathis; S J Rustenbach; S Sauerland; S C Semler; J Stausberg; H Sturm; C Unger; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2010-09-24

2.  Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ole Fröbert; Bo Lagerqvist; Göran K Olivecrona; Elmir Omerovic; Thorarinn Gudnason; Michael Maeng; Mikael Aasa; Oskar Angerås; Fredrik Calais; Mikael Danielewicz; David Erlinge; Lars Hellsten; Ulf Jensen; Agneta C Johansson; Amra Kåregren; Johan Nilsson; Lotta Robertson; Lennart Sandhall; Iwar Sjögren; Ollie Ostlund; Jan Harnek; Stefan K James
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The changing landscape of product development and randomized trials.

Authors:  Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Impact of electronic diabetes registry 'Meaningful Use' on quality of care and hospital utilization.

Authors:  Wencui Han; Raj Sharman; Arvela Heider; Nancy Maloney; Min Yang; Ranjit Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Internal screw fixation compared with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  J-E Gjertsen; T Vinje; L B Engesaeter; S A Lie; L I Havelin; O Furnes; J M Fevang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Patient satisfaction, pain, and quality of life 4 months after displaced femoral neck fractures: a comparison of 663 fractures treated with internal fixation and 906 with bipolar hemiarthroplasty reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Tarjei Vinje; Stein Atle Lie; Lars B Engesaeter; Leif Ivar Havelin; Ove Furnes; Jonas M Fevang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Jonas M Fevang; Kjell Matre; Tarjei Vinje; Lars B Engesæter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  Evidence and practice in spine registries.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Wilco C H Jacobs; Paul C Willems; Michel W J M Wouters; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Impact of inclusion of industry trial results registries as an information source for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Regine Potthast; Volker Vervölgyi; Natalie McGauran; Michaela F Kerekes; Beate Wieseler; Thomas Kaiser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mortality rates at 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip replacement in England: retrospective cohort analysis of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  Adrian R Kendal; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Nigel K Arden; Andrew Carr; Andrew Judge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.