BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapies for obstructive lung diseases are dependent on agents delivered via inhaler devices, and the correct technique is essential for efficiency of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of incorrect inhaler techniques among patients with pulmonary diseases and the efficacy of delivering physician-provided training to patients by letting them practice with their inhaler devices. METHODS: Patients ages ≥18 years with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome were enrolled. At the first visit, the patients were requested to use their own inhalers that they were currently on for initial evaluation of their inhalation technique. Correct and incorrect techniques were determined according to steps previously described in the literature. At the same visit, the physician provided practical training on faulty techniques detected, and a control visit was scheduled. RESULTS: The study involved 108 patients, and 158 different inhalation techniques were assessed. Types of inhaler devices included in the study were metered-dose inhaler and five types of dry-powder inhalers. Fifty-six incorrect practices (35.4%) were noted. Although 64 patients (59.3%) used all of their inhaler devices with the correct technique, 44 (40.7%) used one or more inhalers inappropriately. At the control visit, the patients who misused their inhalers decreased significantly, to 8.3% (p < 0.001). The faulty technique ratio was decreased to 7.0%, which yielded the success of practical training as 80.4%. CONCLUSION: Incorrect inhaler technique is still a problem for patients with obstructive lung diseases even in urbanized areas. Physician-provided practical training on the use of inhaler devices was an effective tool in the correction of inhaler techniques.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapies for obstructive lung diseases are dependent on agents delivered via inhaler devices, and the correct technique is essential for efficiency of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of incorrect inhaler techniques among patients with pulmonary diseases and the efficacy of delivering physician-provided training to patients by letting them practice with their inhaler devices. METHODS:Patients ages ≥18 years with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome were enrolled. At the first visit, the patients were requested to use their own inhalers that they were currently on for initial evaluation of their inhalation technique. Correct and incorrect techniques were determined according to steps previously described in the literature. At the same visit, the physician provided practical training on faulty techniques detected, and a control visit was scheduled. RESULTS: The study involved 108 patients, and 158 different inhalation techniques were assessed. Types of inhaler devices included in the study were metered-dose inhaler and five types of dry-powder inhalers. Fifty-six incorrect practices (35.4%) were noted. Although 64 patients (59.3%) used all of their inhaler devices with the correct technique, 44 (40.7%) used one or more inhalers inappropriately. At the control visit, the patients who misused their inhalers decreased significantly, to 8.3% (p < 0.001). The faulty technique ratio was decreased to 7.0%, which yielded the success of practical training as 80.4%. CONCLUSION: Incorrect inhaler technique is still a problem for patients with obstructive lung diseases even in urbanized areas. Physician-provided practical training on the use of inhaler devices was an effective tool in the correction of inhaler techniques.