Literature DB >> 27163048

A Promising Portable Tool for the Continuous, Online, and Field Monitoring of Pressured Processes.

Jean-Christophe P Gabriel1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27163048      PMCID: PMC4850514          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


× No keyword cloud information.
As exemplified by the recent massive gas leak at Porter Ranch California, hydraulic fracking[1] or other human activities,[2] their impacts on our groundwater and other deep water reservoirs (brines) could be significant and should be monitored on a continuous basis. But, unfortunately, this is not always the case for all pollutants, especially when field operations and high pressure measurements are required. Hence, in the largest sample pool and most cited study on the pollution associated with hydraulic fracking,[1] water analyses were performed in the laboratory by mass spectrometry on samples taken in a one-off manner at water wells. Therefore, being able to monitor, in real time (online), and over a long time period, the composition of ground waters is yet a challenge which, once solved, has the potential to lead to significant societal impact. Therefore, it is a very promising solution that is being brought to the scientific community in the article of the Mizaikoff group.[3] As we continue to manipulate our groundwater reserves through drilling, fracking, and other activities, it becomes ever more important to be able to monitor these reserves in real time. Indeed, this month, the Mizaikoff group reports their studies of CO2 and CH4 concentration measurements when dissolved under harsh conditions (high pressure in simulated deep saline aquifers). This is done using a portable infrared spectrometer equipped with a specifically designed attenuated total reflection (ATR) cell (Figure ), enabling reproducible measurements to be performed in such conditions as can be found underground (especially high pressures, up to 14 MPa). It is shown that stable, linear and reproducible calibration curves can be obtained enabling the calibration of the sensor and therefore the measurement of CO2 and CH4 concentrations in simulated downhole conditions.
Figure 1

Schematic of the ATR pressure cell (red line represents the IR beam). Figure reproduced with permission from ref (3). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

Schematic of the ATR pressure cell (red line represents the IR beam). Figure reproduced with permission from ref (3). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. This study is paramount to enable the understanding, modeling, and eventual usage of such aquifers for the deployment of CO2 and CH4 sequestration strategies. The compact FTIR that has been developed to do so can be fitted to most downhole pressure lines and therefore is suitable for permanent and online/in-line monitoring (note that it also measures temperature and pressure, which are key for real life measurements and calibrations). But beyond sequestration, measuring concentrations of molecules in the reservoir’s conditions will enable a much better understanding of their chemistries. What is clear from the data presented is that this approach could be used for many other purposes and chemical mixtures, since fairly large functioning windows exist in the IR spectra of the ATR cell (Figure ), including other alkanes, ammonia, nitrates, and other chemicals of interest. Ammonia is especially important as its impact on the environment is too seldom studied currently due to the lack of adequate ammonia sensors.[4,5]
Figure 2

Typical FT-IR-ATR spectrum obtained showing simultaneous detection of CO2 and CH4 as well as the wide available wavenumber range available for more complex mixtures studies. Figure provided by T. Schaedle and B. Mizaikoff.

Typical FT-IR-ATR spectrum obtained showing simultaneous detection of CO2 and CH4 as well as the wide available wavenumber range available for more complex mixtures studies. Figure provided by T. Schaedle and B. Mizaikoff. For all these reasons, we suspect that, if such a cell could quickly be made available to the research community, it would become a standard for online, in field, studies in the harsh conditions of ground waters. We therefore look forward to future reports from this group using this device on more complex mixtures, including ammonia and other alkanes, not to mention the study of carbonate’s chemistry in real such environments and their reaction kinetics.[6] Such kinetics will indeed play a key role in enabling or disabling industrial CO2 sequestration, just as it did to enable multicellular life thanks to the carbonic anhydrase enzyme.[7,8] The influence of the temperature on the calibration’s stability will also have to be studied. Finally, it would be interesting to benchmark the ATR cell developed here with the remote analytical capability made possible with chalcogenide or silver halide IR fibers used in evanescent wave spectroscopy.[9,10]
  5 in total

1.  High-sensitivity infrared attenuated total reflectance sensors for in situ multicomponent detection of volatile organic compounds in water.

Authors:  Rui Lu; Wen-Wei Li; Boris Mizaikoff; Abraham Katzir; Yosef Raichlin; Guo-Ping Sheng; Han-Qing Yu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Sponge paleogenomics reveals an ancient role for carbonic anhydrase in skeletogenesis.

Authors:  Daniel J Jackson; Luciana Macis; Joachim Reitner; Bernard M Degnan; Gert Wörheide
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Carbonic anhydrase: chemistry, physiology, and inhibition.

Authors:  T H Maren
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Aqueous carbonic acid (H2CO3).

Authors:  Thomas Loerting; Juergen Bernard
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.102

5.  Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Avner Vengosh; Thomas H Darrah; Nathaniel R Warner; Adrian Down; Robert J Poreda; Stephen G Osborn; Kaiguang Zhao; Jonathan D Karr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.