Literature DB >> 27162543

Surgical Management of the Primary Tumor in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Confirmatory Retrospective Cohort Study.

Shahid Ahmed1, Anne Leis2, Selliah Chandra-Kanthan3, Anthony Fields4, Bruce Reeder2, Nayyer Iqbal5, Kamal Haider5, Duc Le5, Punam Pahwa6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have suggested that patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who undergo surgical resection of the primary tumor (SRPT) have better survival. Yet the results are not confirmed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. Lack of randomization and failure to control prognostic variables such as performance status are major critiques to the findings of the observational studies. We previously have shown that SRPT, independent of chemotherapy and performance status, improves survival of stage IV CRC patients. The current study aims to validate our findings in patients with stage IV CRC who were diagnosed during the period of modern chemotherapy.
METHODS: A cohort of 569 patients with stage IV CRC diagnosed during 2006-2010 in the province of Saskatchewan was evaluated. Cox regression model was used for the adjustment of prognostic variables.
RESULTS: Median age was 69 years (59-95) and M: F was 1.4:1. Fifty-seven percent received chemotherapy, 91.4% received FOLFIRI or FOLFOX & 67% received a biologic agent. Median overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SRPT and received chemotherapy was 27 months compared with 14 months of the non-resection group (p<0.0001). Median OS of patients who received all active agents and had SRPT was 39 months (95%CI: 25.1-52.9). On multivariate analysis, SRPT, hazard ratio (HR):0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56), use of chemotherapy, HR: 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.43), metastasectomy, HR: 0.43 (95%CI: 0.31-0.58), second line therapy, HR: 0.50 (95%CI: 0.35-0.70), and third line therapy, HR: 0.58 (95%CI: 0.41-0.83) were correlated with superior survival.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms our findings and supports a favorable association between SRPT and survival in patients with stage IV CRC who are treated with modern therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological agents.; chemotherapy; combination chemotherapy; primary tumor; stage IV colorectal cancer; surgery; surgical resection; survival

Year:  2016        PMID: 27162543      PMCID: PMC4860801          DOI: 10.7150/jca.14717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Several observational studies have demonstrated superior survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) who undergo surgical resection of the primary tumor [SRPT] 1-6. For example, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 observational studies involving 12456 patients with stage IV CRC demonstrated a hazard ratio (HR) for mortality of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.79) favoring surgery 2. A subsequent meta-analysis involving 44,226 patients in 21 studies indicated potential benefit of resection of the primary tumor in patients with unresectable metastases (odd ratio of 0.28; 95 % CI: 0.17-0.47), translating into a difference in mean survival of 6.4 months in favor of resection 3. Yet the results are not confirmed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. Lack of randomization and failure to control prognostic variables that affect survival including systemic therapy and performance status are major critiques to the findings of the observational studies. Consequently the survival benefit related to SRPT has been attributed to selection bias and selection of younger and healthier patients with good performance status. Our group has demonstrated that surgical resection of the primary tumor improves survival of a cohort of patients with stage IV CRC, who were diagnosed between 1992-2005, irrespective of age, comorbid illness, performance status, chemotherapy, metastasectomy and other important prognostic variables 1. In this group of patients SRPT was associated with 46% reduction in mortality (HR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.41-0.58). However, only 42% of patients were treated with systemic therapy. Among the treated patients about 45% received irinotecan or oxaliplatin based (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX) chemotherapy. Moreover, less than 5% patients received a biological agent. It is not known if similar benefit can be achieved with the use of more effective chemotherapy and biological agents in the management of metastatic CRC. We have undertaken the current study to confirm our findings in a cohort of patients with stage IV CRC who were diagnosed during the period of modern systemic therapy.

Objectives

The study objectives were to validate prognostic impact of SRPT in patients with stage IV CRC who were treated with modern systemic therapy and to assess interaction of SRPT with other prognostic variables in order to identify subgroups of patients who received greater benefit from surgery.

Methods

Eligibility Criteria

The study protocol was approved by the University of Saskatchewan's Ethics Board. Individual records of patients ≥18 years, diagnosed with synchronous stage IV CRC between 2006 and 2010 in the province of Saskatchewan were reviewed. Patients with previous history of CRC, with another active second primary cancer, or who had pathology other than adenocarcinoma were excluded.

Statistical Analysis

The primary end point of this study was to determine relationship between SRPT and overall survival (OS). Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival distribution of subgroups was compared by the Log Rank test. Charlson comorbidity index was used in this confirmatory study to defined major comorbid illness 7. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic significance of SRPT in patients with stage IV CRC in relation to other clinico-pathological variables. The Cox proportional hazard model was used and the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% CI were estimated. Following variables were examined with respect to their prognostic significance: Interventions: Resection of primary tumor, metastasectomy, use of chemotherapy with or without biologics , second line therapy, third line therapy, and radiation therapy; clinical & demographic variables: age (<65 vs. ≥65), gender, major comorbid illness (as per Charlson comorbidity index), secondary cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS] (<2 vs. ≥2), cancer center, and smoking; laboratory values: albumin (≥36 vs. <36 g/l), bilirubin (≥26 vs. <26 um/l), alkaline phosphatase (≥120 vs. <120 U/l), sodium level (≤135 mEq/l vs. >135 mEq/l), serum creatinine (≥120 vs. <120 um/l), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (≥8 vs. <8 mm/l), hemoglobin (≥120 vs. <120 g/l), white blood cell (WBC) (≥11 vs. <11 x 109/l), platelet count (≥450 vs. <450 x109/l), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (≥6 vs. <6 ug/l); disease characteristics: site (colon vs. rectal), grade (3 vs. <3), symptomatic disease, extra-hepatic metastases, and stage (stage IVa vs. stage IVb disease). For the Cox proportional hazard model, log-log survival curves were used to assess the proportional hazards assumption. All variables that were significant on univariate analysis with P<0.05, were examined in multivariate models. The likelihood ratio test and t test were used to determine if a variable correlates with survival in the model. Test for interaction was performed for SRPT and the other variables that were correlated with survival. In addition, secondary analyses were performed in subgroups of patients with asymptomatic disease, or patients who did not have metastasectomy. A two-sided P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. For missing data imputation technique was used. All patients were followed till June 2014 when the data entry was closed. The SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL).

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Five hundred and sixty-nine eligible patients with synchronous stage IV CRC were identified (Figure ). Their median age was 69 years (range: 59-95) and male: female was 1.4:1. Three hundred and thirteen (55%) patients underwent surgery and 256 (45%) did not have surgery. Of 569 patients, 340 (60%) were ≥65 years and 201 (35%) had ECOG PS of ≥2 (Table ). Although no significant differences were noted between the two groups with respect to age, gender, comorbid illness, and smoking status, 122 (48%) patients in the non-resection group had ECOG PS >1 compared with 79 (25%) patients in the resection group (p<0.001). In addition, significant differences were noted between the two groups in relationship with serum creatinine, CEA and bilirubin.

Systemic therapy

Overall 326 (57%) patients received chemotherapy, 199 (64%) in the resection group and 127 (50%) in the non-resection group (p=0.001). Of 326 patients, 298 (91%) received either FOLFIRI (infusional 5 fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan) or FOLFOX (infusional 5 fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin), 157 (48%) received both FOLFIRI and FOLFOX, 213 (65%) received bevacizumab, and 34 (10%) patients with KRAS wild tumor (about 60% had KRAS wild disease) received cetuximab or panitumumab. Of 326 patients who were treated with chemotherapy, on progression 174 (53%) received second line chemotherapy and 52 (16%) received third line therapy. FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab was the preferred first line regimen in most patients who were treated with systemic therapy. On progression, FOLFOX was given as second line therapy and panitumumab or cetuximab alone or in combination with irinotecan was used as the standard third line therapy in patients with KRAS wild tumor. There was no significant difference between the two groups in relation to second and third line therapies (Table ). Furthermore, no significant difference was noted between the two groups with respect to types of systemic therapy, however, 45% patients in the resection group who were treated with systemic therapy received all available therapy (FOLFIRI, FOLFOX and a biologic agent) compared with 35% patients in the non-resection group (p=0.045). Of 199 patients in the resection group who received chemotherapy, 172 (86%) received chemotherapy after surgery. The median time to start chemotherapy was 79 days (IQR: 64-106).

Disease Characteristics

Overall about 41% patients in the non-resection group had rectal or rectosigmoid primary tumor compared with 28% in the resection group (p=0.001). In addition, approximately 54% patients in the non-resection group had stage IVb disease compared with 40% in the resection group (p=0.001). Patients in the resection group had significantly more often peritoneal disease compared with patients in the non-resection group who had more often lung or bone metastases.

Post-operative morbidities and mortality

Median duration of hospital stay of was 9 days (inter-quartile range: 7-13). Of 313 patients who underwent surgery 74 (24%) patients developed post-operative complications. Among 74 patients who developed operative complications 65% had a symptomatic primary tumor. Post-operative complications rates were not mutually exclusive and were as followed: post-operative wound infection in 7% patients, non-wound infection in 5% patients, and anastomotic leak, wound dehiscence, bleeding, and pulmonary embolism in 2% each. Major complications including venous thromboembolism, sepsis, wound dehiscence, anastomotic leakage, post-operative bleeding, pelvic abscess and ischemic bowel were noted in 37 (12%) patients. Of note, 10 (7%) of 142 patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic tumor developed major complications compared with 27 (16%) of 171 patients with symptomatic primary tumor (p=0.01). Overall 30 days mortality rate of the group who underwent surgery was 5%. Fifteen of 171 (9%) patients with symptomatic disease compared with 2 (1%) of 142 patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic disease died within 30 days of surgery (p=0.003).

Non-Surgical Interventions

Overall 30 (5%) patients required a stent for their symptoms. Eight (3%) of 313 patients who underwent surgery compared with 22 (9%) of 256 patients who did not have surgery required a stent (p=0.001). All 8 patients in the surgery group had the stent placed prior to the surgery. In addition, 38 (15%) patients in the non-resection group developed obstructive symptoms and required a stoma formation (colostomy or ileostomy). Forty-five (14%) patients in the resection group compared with 45 (17.6) of 256 patients in the non-resection group received radiation therapy (p=0.30).

Follow up & Survival

Median follow up time for the entire cohort was 11 months (inter-quartile range: 2-26 months). No patient was lost to follow up. Median overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent removal of the primary tumor, irrespective of the use of systemic therapy, was 18 months (95% CI: 15.4-20.6) compared with 4 months (95% CI: 2.6-5.4) if they did not have surgery (p<0.001). Median overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SRPT and received chemotherapy was 27 months (95%CI: 23.3-30.8) versus 14 months (95%CI: 11.2-16.8) if they received chemotherapy but did not have surgery (p<0.001) [Figure ]. Patients who received second line therapy and underwent SRPT had median OS of 30 months (95%CI: 24.9-35.1) compared with 20 months (95%CI: 17.7-22.3) if they did not have surgery (p<0.001) [Figures ]. About 30% patients on progression received third line therapy. The median OS of patients who received third line therapy and underwent SRPT was 39 months (95%CI: 22.1-44.9) compared with 26 months (95%CI: 10.3-41.7) if they did not have surgery (p=0.13). Median OS of patients who received FOLFIRI and FOLFOX and a biologic agent (bevacizumab or anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies) and underwent SRPT was 35 months (95% CI: 30-40) compared with 23 months (95%CI: 19.8-26.3) if they did not surgery (p<0.001) [Figure ]. A subgroup of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic primary tumor who underwent surgery and received systemic therapy had a median OS of 34 months (95%CI: 26.6-43.4) compared with median OS of 14 months (95%CI: 11.1-17.0) if they did not have surgery (p<0.001).

Cox Proportional multivariate modeling for survival

One univariate analyses several variables were correlated with survival (Table ). Tests for interaction were significant between resection of primary tumor and metastasectomy, second line therapy, stage IVb disease and elevated BUN. On multivariate analysis SRPT independently correlated with superior survival with HR for mortality of 0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56). In addition, chemotherapy, HR 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.43), metastasectomy, HR 0.43 (95%CI: 0.31-0.58), second line therapy, HR 0.50 (95%CI:0.35-0.70), and third line therapy, HR 0.58 (95%CI:0.41-0.83) were correlated with superior survival whereas elevated alkaline phosphatase, HR 1.50 (95%CI:1.20-1.78), grade 3 tumor, HR 1.33 (95%CI:1.10-1.62), leukocytosis, HR 1.32 (95%CI:1.05-1.66), stage IVb disease, HR 1.31 (95%CI:1.10-1.56), and ECOG PS >1, HR 1.30 (95%CI:1.04-1.57) were correlated with inferior survival (Table ). After adjustment for other prognostic variables only the interaction between SRPT and subsequent line of therapy was significant suggesting a differential benefit of removal of primary tumor in patients who received other line of therapies. Patients who underwent SRPT and received second line therapy had a median OS of 30 months (95%CI:24.9-35.1) compared with 20 months (95%CI:17.7-22.3) if they did not have surgery (p <0.001). Conversely, patients who had SRPT but did not receive second line therapy had a median OS of 19 months (95% CI: 11.8-26.2) compared with 7 months (95%CI: 5.4-8.6) if they did not have surgery (P<0.001).

Secondary analyses

In the secondary multivariate analyses that excluded the patients who underwent metastasectmy, SRPT was independently associated with significant reduction in mortality with HR, 0.48 (95%CI: 0.38-0.61). Likewise, in a subgroup of 345 patients with asymptomatic or relatively asymptomatic primary tumors, SRPT was significantly correlated with better survival with HR 0.32 (95%CI: 0.22-0.45). Similar benefits were noted in sub-cohorts of patients with colon cancer or ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. In the subgroup of 379 patients with colon cancer surgery independently correlated with survival with HR for mortality of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29-0.53). After excluding patients with poor performance status resection of the primary tumor remained an independent prognostic variable with HR of 0.48 (95%CI: 0.35-0.66).

Discussion

The present study confirmed the survival benefit of SRPT in patients who were treated with combination chemotherapy and biologics. In addition to surgery of the primary tumor, systemic therapy, subsequent line of therapies, metastasectomy, elevated alkaline phosphatase, grade 3 tumor, leukocytosis, stage IVb disease, and performance status were correlated with survival. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the non-resection group had low performance status or larger number of metastatic sites involvement. Furthermore, there was imbalance between the two groups in relation to combination therapy and biologics. Nonetheless, when these variables were included in a multivariate model, SRPT remained an important independent prognostic factor. In fact, the survival benefit was stronger than the other well-established prognostic factors in stage IV CRC including performance status, alkaline phosphatase levels, and the number of metastatic sites 8,9. The median overall survival of patients with stage IV cancer, who are treated with combination of chemotherapy and biologics in the recent phase 3 clinical trials, has been reported in the range of 24-30 months 10-12. However, our cohort was comprised of real world patients and was inclusive of patients with poor performance status and major comorbid illness. Although the median overall survival of the entire cohort was 11 months (8.8-13.2), the survival of patients who underwent SRPT and received chemotherapy was 27 months (95%CI: 23.3-30.8). Moreover, patients who underwent SRPT and received second and third line therapy had median OS of 30 months (95%CI: 24.9-35.1) and 39 months (95%CI: 22.1-44.9), respectively. Recent literature also supports survival benefit of SRPT in the era of modern chemotherapy. A retrospective analysis of CAIRO study that compared combination versus sequential chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly better median OS of 16.7 months in patients who underwent SRPT compared with 11.4 months with no surgery (HR 0.61, 95%CI:49-0.76) [6]. Likewise, a pool analysis of four French phase 3 trials involving 850 patients indicated survival benefit of surgery 4. More than two third of patients were treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX and about 12% received bevacizumab. The primary tumor resection was an independent predictor of superior survival (HR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.53-0.75). In addition our group' meta-analysis of fifteen observational studies did not reveal a positive interaction between surgery and type of chemotherapy. In agreement with previous observation, patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic disease following surgery had longer survival compared with patients with symptomatic primary tumor 13. Of note patients with symptomatic primary tumor had 30 days post-operative mortality rates of 8.8% compared 1.5 % if they had an elective surgery. Emergency surgery has consistently been demonstrated to be an important risk factor for inferior outcome in colorectal surgery 14. We believe that in addition to the biology of symptomatic disease, the 30 days mortality rates most likely accounted for the differences in survival between the two groups. In consistent with our previous observation, significantly higher number of patients with colon tumor underwent surgery compared with patients with rectal cancer. However, compared with 12992-2005 cohort, patients with rectal cancer did not have better prognosis. Among the prognostic factors, systemic therapy was the most important prognostic variables. It is known that survival of patients with stage IV CRC is better if they are exposed to all available active therapeutic agents during the course of their disease 15. The subgroup of patients who received combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab and underwent SRPT had median survival of 35 months (95% CI: 30-40) whereas patients with KRAS wild tumor who received FOLFIRI & FOLFOX in combination with bevacizumab and subsequently were treated with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody had a median OS of 39 months (95%CI: 25.1-52.9). Due to presence of multicollinearity between various lines of chemotherapy and the type of regimens, these variables were not fitted together in the final model. A secondary analysis using chemotherapy regimens and biological agents as opposed to the subsequent lines of therapies was performed (not reported). Both combination of chemotherapy (HR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.52-0.87) and biological agents (HR:0.60, 95%CI:0.45-0.78) were independently correlated with superior survival. Of significant importance, when various chemotherapy regimens were fitted in the multivariate model, resection of primary tumor was independently correlated with survival. Our study revealed positive interaction between SRPT and second line therapy. The patients who had surgery and received second line therapy had a median OS of 30 months compared with 19 months if they did not receive second line therapy (p=0.005). With access to novel agents and their efficacy in the primary tumor as well as lack of major complications related to an intact primary tumor, SRPT is less commonly performed 16-18. Our results, however, support potential benefit of surgery in patients who are treated with modern chemotherapy and suggest a greater benefit in patients who are treated with subsequent line of therapy. Our study is unique that it included performance status, an important prognostic variables in metastatic CRC, in the multivariate model. Most population based studies that support benefit of surgery lack individual patients' data and have failed to include performance status in the multivariate models. In summary the current study suggests survival benefit of SRPT in patients with advanced CRC. To date, no randomized trial has reported survival impact of SRPT in stage IV CRC. Only a prospective randomized trial could confirm the survival benefit conferred by the primary tumor resection. Such trials are ongoing in Europe and will be important to solve this very important question in the management of stage IV CRC.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients in the entire cohort and subgroups of patients who were treated with surgery and systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone.

VariablesStudy cohort N=569Resection group N=313 (55)Non-resection group N=256 (45)P value
Demographic
Median age69 (30-95)68 (33-95)70 (30-95)0.23
Age 65 years or greater340 (60)180 (58)160 (62)0.23
Previous History of Cancer82 (14)39 (13)43 (17)0.15
ECOG performance status 2 or more201 (35)79 (25)122 (48)<0.001
Charlson comorbidity index *141 (25)85 (27)56 (22)0.056
Male335 (59)181 (58)154 (60)0.61
Current or ex-smoker344 (60)196 (63)148 (58)0.26
Laboratory values
Albumin g/l32 ±633 ±731 ±60.39
Alkaline phosphatase U/l202 ±277179 ±309230 ±2290.12
Bilirubin ug/l15 ±2411 ±1118 ±34<0.001
Blood urea nitrogen mm/l7 ±277 ±298 ±240.86
CEA ug/l581 ±3006376 ±1988830 ±38950.004
Creatinine um/l91 ±6386 ±3197 ±88<0.001
Hemoglobin g/l111 ±119123 ±16118 ±170.82
Platelet 109/l350 ±124334 ±114368 ±1350.061
White blood cell count 109/l11.3 ±478.9 ±810.2 ±40.61
Sodium meq/l137 ±3138 ±3137 ±30.27
Treatment
Chemotherapy326 (57)199 (64)127 (50)0.001
Second line therapy174 (53)110 (55)64 (50)0.23
Third line therapy52 (16)36 (18)16 (13)0.12
FOLFIRI OR FOLFOX298 (91)182 (92)116 (91)0.56
Biologics218 (67)137 (69)81 (64)0.24
FOLFIRI & FOLFOX plus a biologics133 (41)89 (45)44 (35)0.045
Radiation therapy90 (16)45 (14)45 (18)0.30
Metastasectomy89 (16)81 (26)8 (3)<0.001
Metastatic sites
Extra-hepatic disease305 (54)151 (48)154 (60)0.005
Bone21 (7)6 (4)15 (10)0.038
Brain5 (2)2 (1)3 (2)0.50
Lung125 (41)50 (33)75 (49)0.004
Peritoneum124 (41)73 (48)51 (33)0.005
Tumor
Stage IVb264 (46)126 (40)138 (54)0.001
Grade 3151 (27)79 (25)72 (28)0.44
Mucinous55 (10)39 (13)16 (6)0.015
Rectum or rectosigmoid tumor190 (33)86 (28)104 (41)0.001
Symptomatic primary tumor224 (39)171 (55)53 (21)<0.001

*Mean Chalrson comorbidity score 9.58±1.53 in resection group compared with 9.50±1.44 non-resection group. Biologics= cetuximab, panitumumab or bevacizumab; CEA= carcinoembryonic antigen; ECOG= Eastern Cooporative Oncology Group; FOLFIRI=Infusional 5-FU, leucovorin and irinotecan; FOLFOX=Infusional 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin.

Table 2

Relationship between various clinic-pathological variables and survival in univariate analysis.

VariablesHR (95% CI)P valueHR (95% CI) for Interaction with SPRTP value
Age ≥65 years1.87 (1.56-2.25)<0.0011.36 (0.95-1.94)0.096
Male gender0.90 (0.75-1.10)0.221.17 (0.83-1.67)0.37
ECOG PS2.51 (2.09-3.02)<0.0010.94 (0.65-1.36)0.75
Comorbid illness1.50 (1.23-1.85)<0.0011.11 (0.74-1.67)0.63
Current Smoking0.86 (0.69-1.08)0.200.80 (0.52-1.26)0.35
Ex-Smoking0.91 (0.76-1.09)0.311 (0.70-1.43)0.98
Treatment Centers1.04 (0.87-1.23)0.681.33 (0.94-1.89)0.11
Albumin <35 g/l1.95 (1.60-2.39)<0.0010.76 (0.49-1.19)0.23
Alkaline phosphatase >120 U/l2.17 (1.79-2.62)<0.0011.04 (0.70-1.55)0.85
Bilirubin ≥26 um/l1.77 (1.28-2.46)0.0011.93 (0.97-3.870.06
BUN ≥8 mm/l1.48 (1.13-1.93)0.0071.82 (1.05-3.16)0.034
CEA ≥5 ug/l2.11 (1.63-2.76)<0.0011.18 (0.64-2.20)0.60
Creatinine ≥120 um/l1.46 (1.06-1.99)0.0261.36 (0.72-2.57)0.34
Hemoglobin <120 g/l1.82 (1.49-2.22)<0.0010.90 (0.60-1.34)0.60
Platelet count, ≥450 x109/l0.92 (0.73-1.17)0.511.14 (0.70-1.86)0.60
WBC ≥11 x 109/l1.39 (1.12-1.71)0.0041.30 (0.84-2.01)0.23
Sodium <135 meq/l1.19 (0.95-1.48)0.141.02 (0.65-1.60)0.92
Extra-hepatic disease1.21 (1.02-1.44)0.0311.36 (0.96-1.94)0.08
Grade 31.48 (1.22-1.79)<0.0011.34 (0.91-1.97)0.14
Mucinous pathology1.13 (0.85-1.51)0.401.74 (0.92-3.28)0.09
Rectum0.80 (0.66-0.96)0.0140.84 (0.58-1.24)0.39
Stage IVb disease1.38 (1.16-1.64)<0.0011.43 (1.01-2.03)0.04
Symptomatic primary tumor1.08 (0.90-1.28)0.421.05 (0.71-1.55)0.82
Primary tumor resection0.44 (0.37-0.53)<0.001NANA
Metastasectomy0.30 (0.22-0.40)<0.0010.74 (0.58-0.94)0.015
Chemotherapy0.24 (0.20-0.29)<0.0011.36 (0.95-1.94)0.09
Second line Treatment0.44 (0.36-0.53)0.0252.10 (1.28-3.35)0.003
Third line Treatment0.41 (0.30-0.56)<0.0011.77 (0.89-3.49)0.10
FOLFOX or FOLFIRI0.27 (0.23-0.33)<0.0011.49 (1.04-2.12)0.029
Biologics0.34 (0.28-0.41)<0.0011.44 (1.0-2.08)0.05
Radiation0.66 (0.52-0.84)<0.0010.97 (0.60-1.57)0.90

Biologics= cetuximab, panitumumab or bevacizumab; CEA= carcinoembryonic antigen; ECOG PS= Eastern Cooporative Oncology Group performance status; FOLFIRI=Infusional 5-FU, leucovorin and irinotecan; FOLFOX=Infusional 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin.

Table 3

Relationship between various clinic-pathological variables and survival in multivariate analysis.

VariablesHR (95% CI)
Surgical resection of primary tumor
Yes0.44 (0.35-0.56)
No1
Chemotherapy
Yes0.33 (0.26-0.43)
No1
Second line therapy
Yes0.50 (0.35-0.70)
No1
Third line therapy
Yes0.58 (0.41-0.83)
No1
Alkaline phosphatase >120 U/l
Yes1.50 (1.20-1.78)
No1
Grade 3 tumors
Yes1.33 (1.10-1.62)
No1
Leukocytosis
Yes1.32 (1.05-1.66)
No1
Stage IVb disease
Yes1.31 (1.10-1.56)
No
ECOG performance status >1
Yes1.30 (1.04-1.57)
No1
  17 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the management of colorectal cancer: from biology to treatment.

Authors:  Shahid Ahmed; Kate Johnson; Osama Ahmed; Nayyer Iqbal
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A meta-analysis to determine the effect of primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases on patient survival.

Authors:  Cillian Clancy; John P Burke; Mitchel Barry; Matthew F Kalady; J Calvin Coffey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Clinical determinants of survival in patients with 5-fluorouracil-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a multivariate analysis of 3825 patients.

Authors:  C H Köhne; D Cunningham; F Di Costanzo; B Glimelius; G Blijham; E Aranda; W Scheithauer; P Rougier; M Palmer; J Wils; B Baron; F Pignatti; P Schöffski; S Micheel; H Hecker
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser; Karyn A Goodman; Mithat Gonen; Ellen Hollywood; Andrea Cercek; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Marc J Gollub; Jinru Shia; Jose G Guillem; Larissa K F Temple; Philip B Paty; Leonard B Saltz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Surgical Resection of Primary Tumor in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Canadian Province Experience.

Authors:  Shahid Ahmed; Anthony Fields; Punam Pahwa; Selliah Chandra-Kanthan; Adnan Zaidi; Duc Le; Kamal Haider; Bruce Reeder; Anne Leis
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 6.  Should noncurative resection of the primary tumour be performed in patients with stage iv colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Ahmed; R K Shahid; A Leis; K Haider; S Kanthan; B Reeder; P Pahwa
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Is primary tumour resection associated with survival improvement in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases? A pooled analysis of individual data from four randomised trials.

Authors:  Matthieu Faron; Jean-Pierre Pignon; David Malka; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Jean-Yves Douillard; Antoine Adenis; Dominique Elias; Olivier Bouché; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Survival impact of surgical resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: results from a large population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Shahid Ahmed; Anne Leis; Anthony Fields; Selliah Chandra-Kanthan; Kamal Haider; Riaz Alvi; Bruce Reeder; Punam Pahwa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabine Venderbosch; Johannes H de Wilt; Steven Teerenstra; Olaf J Loosveld; Aart van Bochove; Harm A Sinnige; Geert-Jan M Creemers; Margot E Tesselaar; Linda Mol; Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  L Assersohn; A Norman; D Cunningham; T Benepal; P J Ross; J Oates
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Resection of the Primary Tumor in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: When Is It Necessary?

Authors:  Leandro Feo; Michael Polcino; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Prognostic accuracy of different lymph node staging system in predicting overall survival in stage IV colon cancer.

Authors:  Lingyu Han; Shaobo Mo; Wenqiang Xiang; Qingguo Li; Renjie Wang; Ye Xu; Weixing Dai; Guoxiang Cai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Inflammation-based prognostic scores as indicators to select candidates for primary site resection followed by multimodal therapy among colorectal cancer patients with multiple metastases.

Authors:  Tadanobu Shimura; Yuji Toiyama; Susumu Saigusa; Hiroki Imaoka; Masato Okigami; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Junichiro Hiro; Minako Kobayashi; Masaki Ohi; Toshimitsu Araki; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  A Concise Review of Pelvic Radiation Therapy (RT) for Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Omer Sager; Ferrat Dincoglan; Selcuk Demiral; Bora Uysal; Hakan Gamsiz; Bahar Dirican; Murat Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-21

5.  Survival Benefit of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Rectal Cancer Treated With Definitive Surgical Resection of Primary Tumor: A Population Based, Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Dakui Luo; Qi Liu; Ji Zhu; Yanlei Ma; Sanjun Cai; Qingguo Li; Xinxiang Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  PREMIUM: A French prospective multicenter observational study of factors impacting on efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment in first-line KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L Mineur; E François; C Plassot; J M Phelip; L Miglianico; L M Dourthe; N Bonichon; L Moreau; R Guimbaud; D Smith; E Achille; R Hervé; J M Bons; S Remy; R Faroux; A L Villing; A Mahamat; I Rabbia; P Soulié; I Baumgaertner; N Mathé; L Vazquez; R Boustany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases.

Authors:  Ki Yoon Doah; Ui Sup Shin; Byong Ho Jeon; Sang Sik Cho; Sun Mi Moon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Meta-analysis of oncologic effect of primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer in the era of modern systemic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gi Won Ha; Jong Hun Kim; Min Ro Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.