Literature DB >> 27162519

NORMAL VALUES OF KEY PINCH STRENGTH IN A HEALTHY NIGERIAN POPULATION.

A I Michael1, A O Iyun2, O A Olawoye2, S A Ademola2, R E Nnabuko3, O M Oluwatosin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the severity of machine hand injuries in our environment, the need to determine the normal values for key pinch strength with which to compare restorative surgeries was justified.
METHOD: A cross sectional survey of participants who had no previous hand injuries limiting hand function. Data obtained included age, gender, body mass index, hand dominance and hand span. The Baseline Hydraulic Pinch Gauge was used to obtain key pinch strength. The influence of the above variables on measured pinch strength was analyzed using independent sample t-tests and Pearson's correlation.
RESULTS: Of the 242 recruited participants, age range between 20 and 80 years, 163(67.4%) were male and 79 (32.6%) were female. Males had higher pinch strength (right-8.3±2.7kg, left-7.6±2.5kg) than females (right-6.3±1.5kg, left- 5.8±1.5kg). Pinch strength varied with age peaking in the fifth decade in males and females. Interestingly, the left handed dominant female had higher right pinch strength than her right handed counterpart (p<0.009). Height, and hand span correlated with pinch strength in females.
CONCLUSION: Normal values for key pinch strength in this Nigerian population are lower than that of Caucasians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key pinch; Nigerians; Normal values.

Year:  2015        PMID: 27162519      PMCID: PMC4853880     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med


  13 in total

1.  Average versus maximum grip strength: which is more consistent?

Authors:  S G Haidar; D Kumar; R S Bassi; S C Deshmukh
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2004-02

2.  Identification of key pinch forces required to complete functional tasks.

Authors:  Niels Smaby; Mary Elise Johanson; Brian Baker; Deborah Ellen Kenney; Wendy Marie Murray; Vincent Rod Hentz
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-03

3.  Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population.

Authors:  S Werle; J Goldhahn; S Drerup; B R Simmen; H Sprott; D B Herren
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2009-01-07

4.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; K Weber; G Volland; N Kashman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers.

Authors:  Jonatan R Ruiz; Vanesa España-Romero; Francisco B Ortega; Michael Sjöström; Manuel J Castillo; Angel Gutierrez
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Prediction of grip and key pinch strength in 978 healthy subjects.

Authors:  Felix Angst; Susann Drerup; Stephan Werle; Daniel B Herren; Beat R Simmen; Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Carpal tunnel decompression. Is lengthening of the flexor retinaculum better than simple division?

Authors:  J J Dias; B Bhowal; C J Wildin; J R Thompson
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2004-06

8.  Key pinch in healthy adults: normative values.

Authors:  C M Günther; A Bürger; M Rickert; C U Schulz
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2008-04

9.  Extended reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap: clinical experience and donor site morbidity.

Authors:  H Koch; L Bruckmann; M Hubmer; E Scharnagl
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Grip and pinch strength in healthy subjects and patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hand: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  Efrat Ziv; Hagar Patish; Zeevi Dvir
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-05-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Can We Use Grip Strength to Predict Other Types of Hand Exertions? An Example of Manufacturing Industry Workers.

Authors:  Victor Ei-Wen Lo; Yi-Chen Chiu; Hsin-Hung Tu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.