Literature DB >> 27162178

Parents' Perspectives on How to Improve the Childhood Vaccination Process.

Tracy A Lieu1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher2, Cathy Chou1, G Thomas Ray1, Eve Wittenberg3.   

Abstract

Few national studies have asked parents how to improve the childhood vaccination process. We surveyed a nationally representative online panel of parents on how to improve this process, rationales for nonstandard approaches, and alternatives to the standard schedule. Twelve percent of the 1222 respondents reported using nonstandard approaches: 3.2% used a specific schedule, 6.0% had no specific schedule, and 2.5% declined all vaccinations. The most common rationales were that too many vaccines are given at once, and discomfort with vaccine ingredients. Regarding how to improve the process, parents using the standard schedule most often said nothing could be improved (51%), or better vaccine information (22%). Those using nonstandard approaches most often would have liked more choice (40%) or better vaccine information (26%). Parents' experiences with the vaccination process could be improved by offering information prior to visits, giving more information about side effects, and allowing more flexibility about vaccine scheduling.

Keywords:  decision making; immunizations; parent preferences; quality of care; vaccines

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27162178     DOI: 10.1177/0009922816649001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  9 in total

1.  Assessing misclassification of vaccination status: Implications for studies of the safety of the childhood immunization schedule.

Authors:  Matthew F Daley; Jason M Glanz; Sophia R Newcomer; Michael L Jackson; Holly C Groom; Marlene M Lugg; Huong Q McLean; Nicola P Klein; Eric S Weintraub; Michael M McNeil
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Parents' confidence in recommended childhood vaccinations: Extending the assessment, expanding the context.

Authors:  Glen J Nowak; Michael A Cacciatore
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Web-Based Tailored Messaging to Increase Vaccination: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jason M Glanz; Nicole M Wagner; Komal J Narwaney; Jennifer Pyrzanowski; Bethany M Kwan; Carter Sevick; Kenneth Resnicow; Amanda F Dempsey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule.

Authors:  Matthew F Daley; Jo Ann Shoup; Sophia R Newcomer; Michael L Jackson; Holly C Groom; Steven J Jacobsen; Huong Q McLean; Nicola P Klein; Eric S Weintraub; Michael M McNeil; Jason M Glanz
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  A qualitative study examining pediatric clinicians' perceptions of delayed vaccine schedules.

Authors:  Anne M Butler; Victoria F Grabinski; Gabrielle D Boloker; Jason G Newland; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Distinguishing Subgroups in Opposition to Infant Immunization: Results From the Listening to Mothers III Survey.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Brittany Ranchoff; Eugene R Declercq
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

7.  Is the pre-natal period a missed opportunity for communicating with parents about immunizations? Evidence from a longitudinal qualitative study in Victoria, British Columbia.

Authors:  Clara Rubincam; Devon Greyson; Constance Haselden; Robin Saunders; Julie A Bettinger
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Temporal Trends in Undervaccination: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Daley; Liza M Reifler; Jo Ann Shoup; Komal J Narwaney; Elyse O Kharbanda; Holly C Groom; Michael L Jackson; Steven J Jacobsen; Huong Q McLean; Nicola P Klein; Joshua T B Williams; Eric S Weintraub; Michael M McNeil; Jason M Glanz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Infant vaccination education preferences among low-income pregnant women.

Authors:  Erika L Fuchs; Jacqueline M Hirth; Fangjian Guo; V Gnaukita Brown; Leslie Cofie; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.