Literature DB >> 27161018

Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Craig S Anderson1, Thompson Robinson1, Richard I Lindley1, Hisatomi Arima1, Pablo M Lavados1, Tsong-Hai Lee1, Joseph P Broderick1, Xiaoying Chen1, Guofang Chen1, Vijay K Sharma1, Jong S Kim1, Nguyen H Thang1, Yongjun Cao1, Mark W Parsons1, Christopher Levi1, Yining Huang1, Verónica V Olavarría1, Andrew M Demchuk1, Philip M Bath1, Geoffrey A Donnan1, Sheila Martins1, Octavio M Pontes-Neto1, Federico Silva1, Stefano Ricci1, Christine Roffe1, Jeyaraj Pandian1, Laurent Billot1, Mark Woodward1, Qiang Li1, Xia Wang1, Jiguang Wang1, John Chalmers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke with a lower-than-standard dose of intravenous alteplase may improve recovery along with a reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.
METHODS: Using a 2-by-2 quasi-factorial open-label design, we randomly assigned 3310 patients who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy (median age, 67 years; 63% Asian) to low-dose intravenous alteplase (0.6 mg per kilogram of body weight) or the standard dose (0.9 mg per kilogram); patients underwent randomization within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke. The primary objective was to determine whether the low dose would be noninferior to the standard dose with respect to the primary outcome of death or disability at 90 days, which was defined by scores of 2 to 6 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). Secondary objectives were to determine whether the low dose would be superior to the standard dose with respect to centrally adjudicated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and whether the low dose would be noninferior in an ordinal analysis of modified Rankin scale scores (testing for an improvement in the distribution of scores). The trial included 935 patients who were also randomly assigned to intensive or guideline-recommended blood-pressure control.
RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 855 of 1607 participants (53.2%) in the low-dose group and in 817 of 1599 participants (51.1%) in the standard-dose group (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.25; the upper boundary exceeded the noninferiority margin of 1.14; P=0.51 for noninferiority). Low-dose alteplase was noninferior in the ordinal analysis of modified Rankin scale scores (unadjusted common odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.13; P=0.04 for noninferiority). Major symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 1.0% of the participants in the low-dose group and in 2.1% of the participants in the standard-dose group (P=0.01); fatal events occurred within 7 days in 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively (P=0.01). Mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between the two groups (8.5% and 10.3%, respectively; P=0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: This trial involving predominantly Asian patients with acute ischemic stroke did not show the noninferiority of low-dose alteplase to standard-dose alteplase with respect to death and disability at 90 days. There were significantly fewer symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages with low-dose alteplase. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; ENCHANTED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01422616.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27161018     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  91 in total

1.  Thrombolysis for stroke in Ireland: increasing access and maintaining safety in a challenging environment.

Authors:  P McElwaine; J McCormack; C Brennan; H Coetzee; P Cotter; R Doyle; A Hickey; F Horgan; C Loughnane; C Macey; P Marsden; D McCabe; R Mulcahy; I Noone; E Shelley; T Stapleton; D Williams; P Kelly; J Harbison
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Use of Mortality as an Endpoint in Noninferiority Trials May Lead to Ethically Problematic Conclusions.

Authors:  Andrew M Hersh; Robert J Walter; Scott K Abberegg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Antiplatelet pretreatment and outcomes in intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Ramin Zand; Vijay K Sharma; Martin Köhrmann; Sotirios Giannopoulos; Efthymios Dardiotis; Anne W Alexandrov; Panayiotis D Mitsias; Peter D Schellinger; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Endovascular thrombectomy with or without systemic thrombolysis?

Authors:  Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Dimitris Mavridis; Anne W Alexandrov; Georgios Magoufis; Adam Arthur; Valeria Caso; Peter D Schellinger; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 5.  Evolution of the Modified Rankin Scale and Its Use in Future Stroke Trials.

Authors:  Joseph P Broderick; Opeolu Adeoye; Jordan Elm
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Early Acute Ischemic Stroke Management for Pharmacists.

Authors:  Michael Armahizer; Alison Blackman; Michael Plazak; Gretchen M Brophy
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 7.  Patients on NOACs in the Emergency Room.

Authors:  Stefan T Gerner; Hagen B Huttner
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Time window and "tissue window": two approaches to assist decision-making in strokes.

Authors:  XuYing Xiang; Fei Cao
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Predictors of functional outcome in patients with stroke thrombolysis in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Sharon Tai; Khean Jin Goh; Khairul Azmi Abdul Kadir; Mohd Idzwan Zakaria; Jun Fai Yap; Kay Sin Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Stroke: The question of alteplase dose for stroke is not resolved.

Authors:  Junya Aoki; Kazumi Kimura
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.