Literature DB >> 27160761

The impact of catchment source group classification on the accuracy of sediment fingerprinting outputs.

Simon Pulley1, Ian Foster2, Adrian L Collins3.   

Abstract

The objective classification of sediment source groups is at present an under-investigated aspect of source tracing studies, which has the potential to statistically improve discrimination between sediment sources and reduce uncertainty. This paper investigates this potential using three different source group classification schemes. The first classification scheme was simple surface and subsurface groupings (Scheme 1). The tracer signatures were then used in a two-step cluster analysis to identify the sediment source groupings naturally defined by the tracer signatures (Scheme 2). The cluster source groups were then modified by splitting each one into a surface and subsurface component to suit catchment management goals (Scheme 3). The schemes were tested using artificial mixtures of sediment source samples. Controlled corruptions were made to some of the mixtures to mimic the potential causes of tracer non-conservatism present when using tracers in natural fluvial environments. It was determined how accurately the known proportions of sediment sources in the mixtures were identified after unmixing modelling using the three classification schemes. The cluster analysis derived source groups (2) significantly increased tracer variability ratios (inter-/intra-source group variability) (up to 2122%, median 194%) compared to the surface and subsurface groupings (1). As a result, the composition of the artificial mixtures was identified an average of 9.8% more accurately on the 0-100% contribution scale. It was found that the cluster groups could be reclassified into a surface and subsurface component (3) with no significant increase in composite uncertainty (a 0.1% increase over Scheme 2). The far smaller effects of simulated tracer non-conservatism for the cluster analysis based schemes (2 and 3) was primarily attributed to the increased inter-group variability producing a far larger sediment source signal that the non-conservatism noise (1). Modified cluster analysis based classification methods have the potential to reduce composite uncertainty significantly in future source tracing studies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Discrimination; Sediment fingerprinting; Sediment sources; Tracing; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160761     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  Monte Carlo fingerprinting of the terrestrial sources of different particle size fractions of coastal sediment deposits using geochemical tracers: some lessons for the user community.

Authors:  Hamid Gholami; Ebrahim Jafari TakhtiNajad; Adrian L Collins; Aboalhasan Fathabadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Tracing sediment sources in a mountainous forest catchment under road construction in northern Iran: comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches.

Authors:  Kazem Nosrati; Arman Haddadchi; Adrian L Collins; Saeedeh Jalali; Mohammad Reza Zare
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Sediment source fingerprinting: benchmarking recent outputs, remaining challenges and emerging themes.

Authors:  Adrian L Collins; Martin Blackwell; Pascal Boeckx; Charlotte-Anne Chivers; Monica Emelko; Olivier Evrard; Ian Foster; Allen Gellis; Hamid Gholami; Steve Granger; Paul Harris; Arthur J Horowitz; J Patrick Laceby; Nuria Martinez-Carreras; Jean Minella; Lisa Mol; Kazem Nosrati; Simon Pulley; Uldis Silins; Yuri Jacques da Silva; Micheal Stone; Tales Tiecher; Hari Ram Upadhayay; Yusheng Zhang
Journal:  J Soils Sediments       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.308

4.  Tracing catchment fine sediment sources using the new SIFT (SedIment Fingerprinting Tool) open source software.

Authors:  S Pulley; A L Collins
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 7.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.