Literature DB >> 27159494

How Do We Know What Works? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation.

Logan M Steele1, Tyler J Mulhearn1, Kelsey E Medeiros1, Logan L Watts1, Shane Connelly1, Michael D Mumford1.   

Abstract

Training is a costly investment. As such, it is of great interest to know the extent to which that investment is yielding a positive return. Recent meta-analytic efforts have observed that ethics training programs are, indeed, having a positive effect, leading to the conclusion that the programs are working. However, they have also uncovered considerable variability in the effectiveness of ethics training programs, which leads to the purpose of the present study-to review current practices in ethics training evaluation. Through this review of 243 studies, consisting of 380 ethics trainings, we identified major themes in evaluation practices and training design. The tradeoffs associated with these evaluation procedures and designs are discussed, along with directions for future research.

Keywords:  Criterion; ethics training; evaluation; measurement; training; training design

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27159494     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1186547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  7 in total

1.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 2.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Continuous Evaluation in Ethics Education: A Case Study.

Authors:  Tristan McIntosh; Cory Higgs; Michael Mumford; Shane Connelly; James DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Fostering Research Integrity.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Recommendations for Effective Integration of Ethics and Responsible Conduct of Research (E/RCR) Education into Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report.

Authors:  Laura A Diaz-Martinez; Ginger R Fisher; David Esparza; Jay M Bhatt; Christina E D'Arcy; Jennifer Apodaca; Sara Brownell; Lisa Corwin; William B Davis; Kevin W Floyd; Patrick J Killion; Jaclyn Madden; Patricia Marsteller; Teresa Mayfield-Meyer; Kelly K McDonald; Martina Rosenberg; Mark A Yarborough; Jeffrey T Olimpo
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Perception and reaction of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers to different forms of research integrity education modality.

Authors:  Jolene Y L Chua; Celine S L Lee; Kwee P Yeo; Yusuf Ali; Chin L Lim
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.834

7.  Current Approaches for Integrating Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR) Education into Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A National Assessment.

Authors:  Laura A Diaz-Martinez; Aimee A Hernandez; Christina E D'Arcy; Stephanie Corral; Jay M Bhatt; David Esparza; Martina Rosenberg; Jeffrey T Olimpo
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.