Literature DB >> 27159382

Electrical velocimetry for noninvasive cardiac output and stroke volume variation measurements in dogs undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Kazumasu Sasaki1, Tatsushi Mutoh2, Tomoko Mutoh3, Ryuta Kawashima3, Hirokazu Tsubone4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare electrical velocimetry (EV) noninvasive measures of cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in dogs undergoing cardiovascular surgery with those obtained with the conventional thermodilution technique using a pulmonary artery catheter. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective experimental trial. ANIMALS: Seven adult Beagle dogs with a median weight of 13.6 kg.
METHODS: Simultaneous, coupled cardiac index (CI; CO indexed to body surface area) measurements by EV (CIEV) and the reference pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution method (CIPAC) were obtained in seven sevoflurane-anaesthetized, mechanically ventilated dogs undergoing experimental open-chest cardiovascular surgery for isolated right ventricular failure. Relationships between SVV or central venous pressure (CVP) and stroke volume (SV) were analysed to estimate fluid responsiveness. Haemodynamic data were recorded intraoperatively and before and after fluid challenge.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of 332 matched sets of CI data revealed an overall bias and precision of - 0.22 ± 0.52 L minute-1 m-2 for CIEV and CIPAC (percentage error: 30.4%). Trend analysis showed a concordance of 88% for CIEV. SVV showed a significant positive correlation (r2 = 0.442, p < 0.0001) with SV changes to a volume loading of 200 mL, but CVP did not (r2 = 0.0002, p = 0.94). Better prediction of SV responsiveness (rise of SV index of ≥ 10%) was observed for SVV (0.74 ± 0.09; p = 0.014) with a significant area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in comparison with CVP (0.53 ± 0.98; p = 0.78), with a cut-off value of 14.5% (60% specificity and 83% sensitivity). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In dogs undergoing cardiovascular surgery, EV provided accurate CO measurements compared with CIPAC, although its trending ability was poor. Further, SVV by EV, but not CVP, reliably predicted fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation in dogs.
Copyright © 2016 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac output; cardiovascular surgery; dog; electrical velocimetry; fluid therapy; haemodynamic monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27159382     DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg        ISSN: 1467-2987            Impact factor:   1.648


  5 in total

1.  Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Mukhtar; Mohamed Elayashy; Amr H Sayed; Gihan M Obaya; Akram A Eladawy; Mai A Ali; Hisham M Dahab; Dina Z Khalaf; Mostafa A Mohamed; Amr H Elfouly; Gad M Behairy; Amr A Abdelaal
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Effect of hemodialysis on impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) parameters in children.

Authors:  Meike Wilken; Jun Oh; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Dominique Singer; Martin E Blohm
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Anesthesia-Associated Relative Hypovolemia: Mechanisms, Monitoring, and Treatment Considerations.

Authors:  Jessica Noel-Morgan; William W Muir
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-16

4.  Comparison of Noninvasive Dynamic Indices of Fluid Responsiveness Among Different Ventilation Modes in Dogs Recovering from Experimental Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Kazumasu Sasaki; Tatsushi Mutoh; Shuzo Yamamoto; Yasuyuki Taki; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-29

5.  Noninvasive assessment of fluid responsiveness for emergency abdominal surgery in dogs with pulmonary hypertension: Insights into high-risk companion animal anesthesia.

Authors:  Kazumasu Sasaki; Shuzo Yamamoto; Tatsushi Mutoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.