BACKGROUND: Concussions are common in football, and knowledge of their incidence rates across settings is needed to develop strategies to decrease occurrence. PURPOSE: To examine sports-related concussion rates in a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Football Bowl Subdivision sample based on the activity setting where injuries occurred, during which type of play, and when relative to the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Medical records from January 2006 to January 2015 for an NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision program were analyzed. Concussion rates (per 1000 athlete-exposures [AEs]) were compared among the following settings: spring practice, preseason training camp, regular season high-contact practice, regular season low-contact practice, bowl game practice, and game competition. Play-type analyses examined incidence rates during offensive, defensive, and special teams plays. Changes in concussion rate coinciding with the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy were also studied. RESULTS: Of the 452 unique players on the roster during the 9-year study period, 118 (26.1%) were diagnosed with a concussion. The concussion rate during games was significantly higher than all practices combined (P < .001). However, when game rate (4.46 per 1000 AEs) was compared with preseason training camp alone (3.81 per 1000 AEs), there was no significant difference (P = .433). The concussion rate during special teams plays was significantly higher than that during offensive (P < .001) or defensive plays (P < .001). The concussion rate in the 4 seasons (2010-2014) after the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy was initiated was significantly higher than the 4 seasons (2006-2009) preceding the policy (P = .036). CONCLUSION: Study results show that (1) based on activity type, games and preseason training camp present the greatest risk of sustaining a concussion; (2) based on play type, special teams plays pose the greatest risk of sustaining a concussion; and (3) the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy coincided with a significant increase in recognition of concussion.
BACKGROUND: Concussions are common in football, and knowledge of their incidence rates across settings is needed to develop strategies to decrease occurrence. PURPOSE: To examine sports-related concussion rates in a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Football Bowl Subdivision sample based on the activity setting where injuries occurred, during which type of play, and when relative to the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Medical records from January 2006 to January 2015 for an NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision program were analyzed. Concussion rates (per 1000 athlete-exposures [AEs]) were compared among the following settings: spring practice, preseason training camp, regular season high-contact practice, regular season low-contact practice, bowl game practice, and game competition. Play-type analyses examined incidence rates during offensive, defensive, and special teams plays. Changes in concussion rate coinciding with the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy were also studied. RESULTS: Of the 452 unique players on the roster during the 9-year study period, 118 (26.1%) were diagnosed with a concussion. The concussion rate during games was significantly higher than all practices combined (P < .001). However, when game rate (4.46 per 1000 AEs) was compared with preseason training camp alone (3.81 per 1000 AEs), there was no significant difference (P = .433). The concussion rate during special teams plays was significantly higher than that during offensive (P < .001) or defensive plays (P < .001). The concussion rate in the 4 seasons (2010-2014) after the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy was initiated was significantly higher than the 4 seasons (2006-2009) preceding the policy (P = .036). CONCLUSION: Study results show that (1) based on activity type, games and preseason training camp present the greatest risk of sustaining a concussion; (2) based on play type, special teams plays pose the greatest risk of sustaining a concussion; and (3) the 2010 NCAA concussion management policy coincided with a significant increase in recognition of concussion.
Authors: Haley A Bookbinder; Megan N Houston; Karen Y Peck; Stephanie Habecker; Brian J Colsant; Tim F Kelly; Sean P Roach; Steven R Malvasi; Gerald T McGinty; Darren E Campbell; Steven J Svoboda; Kenneth L Cameron Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Kathryn L Van Pelt; Tim Puetz; Jennylee Swallow; Andrew P Lapointe; Steven P Broglio Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Jillian E Urban; Mireille E Kelley; Mark A Espeland; Elizabeth M Davenport; Christopher T Whitlow; Alexander K Powers; Joseph A Maldjian; Joel D Stitzel Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Christine M Baugh; Emily Kroshus; Patrick T Kiernan; David Mendel; William P Meehan Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Mark Patrick Pankow; R A Syrydiuk; A T Kolstad; A K Hayden; C R Dennison; M Mrazik; B E Hagel; C A Emery Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: Christina D Mack; Gary Solomon; Tracey Covassin; Nicholas Theodore; Javier Cárdenas; Allen Sills Journal: Sports Health Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: William T Tsushima; Andrea M Siu; Hyeong Jun Ahn; Bolin L Chang; Nathan M Murata Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Tyler C Duffield; Miranda M Lim; Melissa Novak; Amber Lin; Madison Luther; Cydni N Williams; Juan Piantino Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2020-08-02