| Literature DB >> 27158170 |
Katarzyna Wolny-Koładka1, Anna Lenart-Boroń1.
Abstract
Bacterial Escherichia coli isolates were derived from waters of the Nowohucki Reservoir (Cracow, Poland) in summer and winter seasons. In total, 94 strains, identified as E. coli, were isolated from five sampling sites in the area of the reservoir. Based on the disk-diffusion tests, it was found that the tested isolates were predominantly resistant to ticarcillin and ampicillin. Numerous multi-drug resistant strains were detected, which however did not exhibit the ESBL phenotype. However, PCR approach allowed to detect ESBL-mechanism genes (CTX-M3, OXA, SHV, and TEM) in as much as 38 % of E. coli isolates. These results were coupled with significant molecular diversity of the E. coli strains revealed in BOXA1R-based rep-PCR technique.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Disk-diffusion method; ESBL; Escherichia coli; PCR; Water
Year: 2016 PMID: 27158170 PMCID: PMC4835524 DOI: 10.1007/s11270-016-2833-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Air Soil Pollut ISSN: 0049-6979 Impact factor: 2.520
Fig. 1Location of water sampling sites (www.mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/)
Applied antibiotic disks (Oxoid)
| No. | Antibiotic | Abbr. | Concentration (μg) | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Amikacin | AK | 30 | Aminoglycosides |
| 2. | Amoxicillin/clavulanic acida | AMC | 30 | 3rd generation penicillins |
| 3. | Ampicillin | AMP | 10 | Aminoglycosides |
| 4. | Aztreonam | ATM | 30 | Monobactams |
| 5. | Cefamandole | MA | 30 | 2nd generation cephalosporins |
| 6. | Cefepime | FEP | 30 | 4th generation cephalosporins |
| 7. | Cefotaximea | CTX | 30 | 3rd generation cephalosporins |
| 8. | Cefoxitin | FOX | 30 | 3rd generation cephalosporins |
| 9. | Ceftazidimea | CAZ | 30 | 3rd generation cephalosporins |
| 10. | Cefalotin | KF | 30 | 3rd generation cephalosporins |
| 11. | Cefazolin | KZ | 30 | 1st generation cephalosporins |
| 12. | Ciprofloxacin | CIP | 5 | Chinolons |
| 13. | Gentamicin | CN | 10 | Aminoglycosides |
| 14. | Netilmicin | NET | 30 | Aminoglycosides |
| 15. | Piperacillin | PRL | 100 | 4th generation penicillins |
| 16. | Piperacillin/tazobactam | TZP | 110 | 4th generation penicillins |
| 17. | Tetracycline | TE | 30 | Tetracyclines |
| 18. | Ticarcyillin | TIC | 75 | 4th generation penicillins |
| 19. | Tobramycin | TOB | 10 | Aminoglycosides |
| 20. | Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | SXT | 25 | Sulfonamides |
aAntibiotics used in the detection of ESBL mechanism
Water and air temperature measured at the sampling sites
| No. | Sampling site | Winter—January 15th 2015 | Summer—August 10th 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air temp. (°C) | Water temp. (°C) | Air temp. (°C) | Water temp. (°C) | ||
| 1. | Inflow | 1.6 | 4.1 | 28.1 | 19.1 |
| 2. | Artificial beach | 0.8 | 1.8 | 25.7 | 26.8 |
| 3. | Angler’s house | 1.3 | 3.8 | 26.1 | 27.9 |
| 4. | Pumping station | 0.6 | 1.5 | 26.3 | 26.3 |
| 5. | Outflow | 0.7 | 3.9 | 23.2 | 18.5 |
The share of E. coli isolates—sensitive, intermediate sensitive, and resistant to the examined antibiotics
| No. | Antibiotic | (S) Sensitive | (I) Intermediate | (R) Resistant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Amikacin | 91 | 3 | 0 |
| 2. | Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | 63 | 0 | 31 |
| 3. | Ampicillin | 44 | 0 | 50 |
| 4. | Aztreonam | 71 | 5 | 18 |
| 5. | Cefamandole | 72 | 1 | 21 |
| 6. | Cefepime | 86 | 6 | 2 |
| 7. | Cefotaxime | 84 | 3 | 7 |
| 8. | Cefoxitin | 66 | 0 | 28 |
| 9. | Ceftazidime | 81 | 7 | 6 |
| 10. | Cefalotin | 42 | 17 | 35 |
| 11. | Cefazolin | 41 | 18 | 35 |
| 12. | Ciprofloxacin | 71 | 3 | 20 |
| 13. | Gentamicin | 61 | 28 | 5 |
| 14. | Netilmicin | 88 | 2 | 4 |
| 15. | Piperacillin | 81 | 0 | 13 |
| 16. | Piperacillin/tazobactam | 93 | 1 | 0 |
| 17. | Tetracycline | 61 | 11 | 22 |
| 18. | Ticarcillin | 41 | 0 | 53 |
| 19. | Tobramycin | 53 | 34 | 7 |
| 20. | Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 82 | 4 | 8 |
Fig. 2The proportion of multi-drug resistant E. coli strains
Fig. 3Changes in the waterborne E. coli antimicrobial resistance profile according to the period of strain isolation
Fig. 4UPGMA dendrogram of waterborne E. coli strains collected in the summer from 5 points located within the area of the Nowohucki Reservoir
Fig. 5UPGMA dendrogram of waterborne E. coli strains collected in the winter from 5 points located within the area of the Nowohucki Reservoir
The results of AMOVA analysis for E. coli isolates in two groups (summer and winter) with five populations (sampling sites) each
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variation components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 14.119 | 0.13679 | 4.00 |
| Among populations within groups | 46.513 | 0.34889 | 10.20 |
| Within populations | 246.528 | 2.93486 | 85.80 |
| Total | 307.160 | 3.42054 | 100.00 |
| Fixation index—Fst | 0.14199 |
Fig. 6Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes responsible for the emergence of ESBL mechanism in E. coli