Susana Al-Halabí1, Pilar A Sáiz2, Patricia Burón1, Marlén Garrido3, Antoni Benabarre4, Esther Jiménez5, Jorge Cervilla6, María Isabel Navarrete6, Eva M Díaz-Mesa7, Leticia García-Álvarez7, José Muñiz8, Kelly Posner9, María A Oquendo9, María Paz García-Portilla10, Julio Bobes2. 1. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, España; Instituto Universitario de Neurociencias del Principado de Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, España. 2. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, España; Instituto Universitario de Neurociencias del Principado de Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, España; Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España. 3. Instituto Universitario de Neurociencias del Principado de Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, España. 4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, España; Unitat de Trastorn Bipolar, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigaciones Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España. 5. Unitat de Trastorn Bipolar, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigaciones Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España. 6. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, España; Unidad de Salud Mental, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España. 7. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, España; Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España. 8. Instituto Universitario de Neurociencias del Principado de Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, España; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España. 9. Departamento de Psiquiatría, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, Nueva York, NY, Estados Unidos. 10. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Oviedo, España; Instituto Universitario de Neurociencias del Principado de Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, España; Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España. Electronic address: albert@uniovi.es.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the C-SSRS (Sp-CSSRS). METHOD: Data are from a naturalistic, cross-sectional, multicentre, validation study, including 467 psychiatric outpatients, 242 of whom had a history of suicide attempt. The study measures were: C-SSRS; the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); the Beck Suicide Intent Scale; the Medical Damage Scale. RESULTS: Construct validity: Pearson coefficient between the C-SSRS severity (C-Sev) and intensity (C-Int) of ideation subscale scores was 0.44 (P<.000) for the total sample. Likewise, Pearson coefficient between C-Sev score and HDRS item 3 was 0.56 (P<.000). For the sub-sample of patients with suicide attempt, significant Pearson correlations were found between the C-Sev and the Beck Suicide Intent Scale scores (r=0.22; P=.001). Discriminant validity: Significant differences were found in C-Sev and C-Int scores between patients with and without suicide attempt (P<.000). The C-Sev score discriminated between patients based on HDRS item 3 (P<.009). Sensitivity to change: Linear regression showed that a one-unit decrease in HDRS item 3 corresponded to a decrease of 5.08 units in the C-Sev score (P=.141). A one-unit change in HDRS item 3 corresponded to a change of 13.51 on the C-Int assessments (P=.007). Cronbach's alpha was 0.53 for C-Int. The principal component analysis identified 2 components that explain 55.66% of the total variance (C-Int). CONCLUSION: The data support that the Sp-C-SSRS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing suicidal ideation and behaviour in daily clinical practice and research settings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the C-SSRS (Sp-CSSRS). METHOD: Data are from a naturalistic, cross-sectional, multicentre, validation study, including 467 psychiatric outpatients, 242 of whom had a history of suicide attempt. The study measures were: C-SSRS; the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); the Beck Suicide Intent Scale; the Medical Damage Scale. RESULTS: Construct validity: Pearson coefficient between the C-SSRS severity (C-Sev) and intensity (C-Int) of ideation subscale scores was 0.44 (P<.000) for the total sample. Likewise, Pearson coefficient between C-Sev score and HDRS item 3 was 0.56 (P<.000). For the sub-sample of patients with suicide attempt, significant Pearson correlations were found between the C-Sev and the Beck Suicide Intent Scale scores (r=0.22; P=.001). Discriminant validity: Significant differences were found in C-Sev and C-Int scores between patients with and without suicide attempt (P<.000). The C-Sev score discriminated between patients based on HDRS item 3 (P<.009). Sensitivity to change: Linear regression showed that a one-unit decrease in HDRS item 3 corresponded to a decrease of 5.08 units in the C-Sev score (P=.141). A one-unit change in HDRS item 3 corresponded to a change of 13.51 on the C-Int assessments (P=.007). Cronbach's alpha was 0.53 for C-Int. The principal component analysis identified 2 components that explain 55.66% of the total variance (C-Int). CONCLUSION: The data support that the Sp-C-SSRS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing suicidal ideation and behaviour in daily clinical practice and research settings.
Authors: José Miguel Valdés; Francisco Javier Díaz; Pascale Marie Christiansen; Gabriel Arturo Lorca; Francisco Javier Solorza; Matías Alvear; Saray Ramírez; Daniel Nuñez; Ricardo Araya; Jorge Gaete Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Susana Al-Halabí; Alicia Pérez-Albéniz; Martin Debbané Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alma Delia Genis-Mendoza; Diana María Dionisio-García; Thelma Beatriz Gonzalez-Castro; Carlos Alfonso Tovilla-Zaráte; Isela Esther Juárez-Rojop; María Lilia López-Narváez; Rosa Giannina Castillo-Avila; Humberto Nicolini Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Xavier Alvarez-Subiela; Carmina Castellano-Tejedor; Francisco Villar-Cabeza; Mar Vila-Grifoll; Diego Palao-Vidal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 4.614