Literature DB >> 27157925

A risk scoring system for the differentiation between melanoma with regression and regressing nevi.

P Rubegni1, L Tognetti2, G Argenziano3, N Nami1, G Brancaccio3, E Cinotti4, C Miracco5, M Fimiani1, G Cevenini6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous regression of melanomas is relatively common, its prevalence ranging from 10 to 35%. However, regressing nevi can exhibit worrisome feature and simulate melanoma both clinically and dermoscopically. Thus, the presence of regression can represent a confounding factor.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of dermoscopic patterns of "regression" in a series of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions, and to design an integrated scoring system. Scoring classifiers are very effective in selecting the significant parameters for discriminating two clinical conditions, thus can rapidly calculate a patient's risk for a given disease.
METHODS: We selected a series of 95 regressing melanocytic lesions, including 50 regressing nevi and 45 melanomas with regression. For each lesion, 12 dermoscopic variables (i.e. five types of regression structures, five atypical pigmentation structures, atypical vascular pattern and pink areas) were examined by three expert in dermoscopy (blinded to the histological diagnosis). The dermoscopic evaluation was then combined with patient age, gender, body site and the maximum diameter of lesion. Concordance analysis with Cohen's kappa was performed between the three clinicians. A risk scoring system was designed by the leave-one-out cross-validation procedure to ensure model prediction power.
RESULTS: The predictive score model revealed a sensitivity of 97.8% and a specificity of 75.5% in discriminating nevi and melanomas with regression. Using the score model, the diagnostic performance of the examiners increased by an average of 23.7% in sensitivity and 5.9% in specificity, compared with standard dermoscopic pattern analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: We assessed the validity of an integrated risk scoring model as a new methodological approach that could help the dermatologist in the differentiation between melanoma with regression and regressing nevus. Future studies could test the setting up of a score model over an even more complex pool of data obtained from different skin lesions with various diagnostic devices.
Copyright © 2016 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dermoscopy; Melanoma; Regression; Risk score model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27157925     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatol Sci        ISSN: 0923-1811            Impact factor:   4.563


  8 in total

1.  Frequency of Publication of Dermoscopic Images in Inter-observer Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sam Polesie; Oscar Zaar
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

3.  Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

4.  Impact of clinical and personal data in the dermoscopic differentiation between early melanoma and atypical nevi.

Authors:  Linda Tognetti; Elisa Cinotti; Elvira Moscarella; Francesca Farnetani; Josep Malvehy; Aimilios Lallas; Giovanni Pellacani; Giuseppe Argenziano; Gabriele Cevenini; Pietro Rubegni
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-10-31

5.  Diagnostic Performance of a Support Vector Machine for Dermatofluoroscopic Melanoma Recognition: The Results of the Retrospective Clinical Study on 214 Pigmented Skin Lesions.

Authors:  Łukasz Szyc; Uwe Hillen; Constantin Scharlach; Friederike Kauer; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-25

6.  Trends in Incidence and Mortality of Skin Melanoma in Lithuania 1991-2015.

Authors:  Audrius Dulskas; Dovile Cerkauskaite; Ieva Vincerževskiene; Vincas Urbonas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Dermoscopy of early melanomas: variation according to the anatomic site.

Authors:  Linda Tognetti; Alessandra Cartocci; Elisa Cinotti; Elvira Moscarella; Francesca Farnetani; Cristina Carrera; Aimilios Lallas; Danica Tiodorovic; Caterina Longo; Susana Puig; Jean Luc Perrot; Giuseppe Argenziano; Giovanni Pellacani; Gennaro Cataldo; Alberto Balistreri; Gabriele Cevenini; Pietro Rubegni
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.017

8.  An Updated Algorithm Integrated With Patient Data for the Differentiation of Atypical Nevi From Early Melanomas: the idScore 2021.

Authors:  Linda Tognetti; Alessandra Cartocci; Martina Bertello; Mafalda Giordani; Elisa Cinotti; Gabriele Cevenini; Pietro Rubegni
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2022-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.