Peter Luehring-Jones1, Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary2, James G Murphy3, Ashley Dennhardt3, Kristen P Lindgren4, Devorah E Yarmush5, Joel Erblich6. 1. Department of Psychology, The City College of New York, The City University of New York, North Academic Center, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031, United States. 2. Department of Psychology, Hunter College, The City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Drive, Memphis, TN 38152, United States. 4. Center for the Study of Health & Risk Behaviors, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, 1100 NE 45th Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, United States. 5. Department of Psychology, Hunter College, The City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. 6. Department of Psychology, Hunter College, The City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States. Electronic address: jerblich@hunter.cuny.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research has demonstrated that both poor self-regulation and favorable implicit associations toward alcohol can play important roles in predicting drinking. Less well studied, however, is how the interplay between implicit associations and self-regulation may impact decisions about alcohol consumption. Behavioral economics is one important tool that may provide insight into the cognitive processes that impact demand for alcohol and drinking decisions. METHODS: Healthy young adult participants completed an Implicit Association Task (IAT) that measured the strength of associations between approach/avoid attributes and target alcohol/neutral images. Impaired self-regulation was assessed by a classic delay discounting task. Participants also completed an Alcohol Purchase Task (APT), which yields multiple behavioral economic indices, chief among which are intensity (the number of drinks a participant would consume if the drinks were free) and elasticity (the degree to which an increased per-drink price impacts the number of drinks consumed in a hypothetical drinking situation). Finally, participants completed a timeline follow-back assessment of past-90-day drinking. RESULTS: Findings indicated that implicit approach associations toward alcohol predicted increased demand for alcohol on the APT. Although delay discounting did not have a direct effect on demand for alcohol, there was a significant interaction between IAT and delay discounting, such that higher implicit alcohol approach associations predicted particularly high demand for alcohol among participants with poorer self-regulation. APT and IAT, in turn, predicted self-reported drinking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that favorable attitudes toward alcohol, together with poor self-regulation, can significantly impact drinking decisions in healthy young adults.
BACKGROUND: Recent research has demonstrated that both poor self-regulation and favorable implicit associations toward alcohol can play important roles in predicting drinking. Less well studied, however, is how the interplay between implicit associations and self-regulation may impact decisions about alcohol consumption. Behavioral economics is one important tool that may provide insight into the cognitive processes that impact demand for alcohol and drinking decisions. METHODS: Healthy young adult participants completed an Implicit Association Task (IAT) that measured the strength of associations between approach/avoid attributes and target alcohol/neutral images. Impaired self-regulation was assessed by a classic delay discounting task. Participants also completed an Alcohol Purchase Task (APT), which yields multiple behavioral economic indices, chief among which are intensity (the number of drinks a participant would consume if the drinks were free) and elasticity (the degree to which an increased per-drink price impacts the number of drinks consumed in a hypothetical drinking situation). Finally, participants completed a timeline follow-back assessment of past-90-day drinking. RESULTS: Findings indicated that implicit approach associations toward alcohol predicted increased demand for alcohol on the APT. Although delay discounting did not have a direct effect on demand for alcohol, there was a significant interaction between IAT and delay discounting, such that higher implicit alcohol approach associations predicted particularly high demand for alcohol among participants with poorer self-regulation. APT and IAT, in turn, predicted self-reported drinking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that favorable attitudes toward alcohol, together with poor self-regulation, can significantly impact drinking decisions in healthy young adults.
Authors: Kathryn E Soltis; Samuel F Acuff; Ashley A Dennhardt; Brian Borsari; Matthew P Martens; James G Murphy Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Kristen P Lindgren; Christian S Hendershot; Jason J Ramirez; Edward Bernat; Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Kirsten P Peterson; James G Murphy Journal: Clin Psychol Rev Date: 2018-04-11
Authors: Victor Martínez-Loredo; Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa; José R Fernández-Hermida; James MacKillop Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 7.256