Dejan Georgiev1, Lorenzo Rocchi2, Pierluigi Tocco3, Maarten Speekenbrink4, John C Rothwell3, Marjan Jahanshahi5. 1. Cognitive Motor Neuroscience Group, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Department of Neurology, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. 2. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy. 3. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. 4. Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, UCL Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 5. Cognitive Motor Neuroscience Group, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: m.jahanshahi@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) refers to the balancing of speed versus accuracy during decision-making. SAT is very commonly investigated with perceptual decision-making tasks such as the moving dots task (MDT). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) are two brain regions considered to be involved in the control of SAT. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES: The study tested whether the DLPFC and the pre-SMA play an essential role in the control of SAT. We hypothesized that continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the right DLPFC would primarily alter the rate of accumulation of evidence, whereas stimulation of the pre-SMA would influence the threshold for reaching a decision. METHODS: Fifteen (5 females; mean age = 30, SD =5.40) healthy volunteers participated in the study. We used two versions of the MDT and cTBS over the right DLPFC, pre-SMA and sham stimulation. The drift diffusion model was fit to the behavioural data (reaction time and error rate) in order to calculate the drift rate, boundary separation (threshold) and non-decision time. RESULTS: cTBS over the right DLPFC decreased the rate of accumulation of evidence (i.e. the drift rate from the diffusion model) in high (0.35 and 0.5) but not in low coherence trials. cTBS over the pre-SMA changed the boundary separation/threshold required to reach a decision on accuracy, but not on speed trials. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest for the first time that both the DLPFC and the pre-SMA make essential but distinct contributions to the modulation of SAT.
BACKGROUND: The speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) refers to the balancing of speed versus accuracy during decision-making. SAT is very commonly investigated with perceptual decision-making tasks such as the moving dots task (MDT). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) are two brain regions considered to be involved in the control of SAT. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES: The study tested whether the DLPFC and the pre-SMA play an essential role in the control of SAT. We hypothesized that continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the right DLPFC would primarily alter the rate of accumulation of evidence, whereas stimulation of the pre-SMA would influence the threshold for reaching a decision. METHODS: Fifteen (5 females; mean age = 30, SD =5.40) healthy volunteers participated in the study. We used two versions of the MDT and cTBS over the right DLPFC, pre-SMA and sham stimulation. The drift diffusion model was fit to the behavioural data (reaction time and error rate) in order to calculate the drift rate, boundary separation (threshold) and non-decision time. RESULTS:cTBS over the right DLPFC decreased the rate of accumulation of evidence (i.e. the drift rate from the diffusion model) in high (0.35 and 0.5) but not in low coherence trials. cTBS over the pre-SMA changed the boundary separation/threshold required to reach a decision on accuracy, but not on speed trials. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest for the first time that both the DLPFC and the pre-SMA make essential but distinct contributions to the modulation of SAT.
Authors: Gareth R Barnes; Sven Bestmann; James J Bonaiuto; Sofie S Meyer; Simon Little; Holly Rossiter; Martina F Callaghan; Frederic Dick Journal: Elife Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Lorenzo Rocchi; Jaime Ibáñez; Alberto Benussi; Ricci Hannah; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; John Rothwell Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: José A Pineda-Pardo; Ignacio Obeso; Pasqualina Guida; Michele Dileone; Bryan A Strange; José A Obeso; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2019-10-31