Ramzi Amri1, Coen L Klos2, Liliana Bordeianou1, David L Berger3. 1. Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 15 Parkman St, WAC 460, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 2. Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 3. Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 15 Parkman St, WAC 460, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: dberger@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR), the ratio of tumor-positive lymph nodes (+LN) to the total number of resected lymph nodes (rLN), predicts recurrence and survival in colon cancer. Variations in colonic resection length (RL) may influence rLN, +LN, or both, thereby potentially impacting LNR and its prognostic value in colon cancer. METHODS: All colon cancer patients treated surgically at our center from 2004 to 2011 were included in an institutional review board-approved data repository (n = 1,039). RESULTS: Larger RL was associated with increased rLN (ρ = .22; P < .001) but not with +LN (P = .21). In node-positive patients (n = 411), RL-adjusted LNR had weaker correlations with death (ρ = .338 vs .373, both P < .001) or metastatic disease (ρ = .303 vs .345; both P < .001) and a smaller area under the curve (death: .695 vs .715, metastasis: .675 vs .699). Findings were similar in segmental, extended segmental, and total colectomy subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that resections are performed following standard oncologic principles, our analysis shows that RL does not significantly impact the prognostic value of LNR in colon cancer. Correcting LNR for RL seems redundant and may even act as noise distorting LNR values.
BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR), the ratio of tumor-positive lymph nodes (+LN) to the total number of resected lymph nodes (rLN), predicts recurrence and survival in colon cancer. Variations in colonic resection length (RL) may influence rLN, +LN, or both, thereby potentially impacting LNR and its prognostic value in colon cancer. METHODS: All colon cancerpatients treated surgically at our center from 2004 to 2011 were included in an institutional review board-approved data repository (n = 1,039). RESULTS: Larger RL was associated with increased rLN (ρ = .22; P < .001) but not with +LN (P = .21). In node-positive patients (n = 411), RL-adjusted LNR had weaker correlations with death (ρ = .338 vs .373, both P < .001) or metastatic disease (ρ = .303 vs .345; both P < .001) and a smaller area under the curve (death: .695 vs .715, metastasis: .675 vs .699). Findings were similar in segmental, extended segmental, and total colectomy subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that resections are performed following standard oncologic principles, our analysis shows that RL does not significantly impact the prognostic value of LNR in colon cancer. Correcting LNR for RL seems redundant and may even act as noise distorting LNR values.
Authors: Lieve G J Leijssen; Anne M Dinaux; Ramzi Amri; Hiroko Kunitake; Liliana G Bordeianou; David L Berger Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Antonio Zanghì; Andrea Cavallaro; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Serena Curella Botta; Salvatore Lo Bianco; Maria Di Vita; Francesco Cardì; Alessandro Cappellani Journal: Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Date: 2020-12-28