Literature DB >> 27156680

Metabolic and endocrine differences between Bos taurus and Bos indicus females that impact the interaction of nutrition with reproduction.

Roberto Sartori1, Lindsay U Gimenes2, Pedro L J Monteiro3, Leonardo F Melo3, Pietro S Baruselli4, Michele R Bastos5.   

Abstract

During the last decade, researchers have studied the differences in the reproductive physiology between Bos taurus and Bos indicus breeds. This manuscript focuses on the main aspects of ovarian function and circulating hormones of B. taurus and B. indicus cows and heifers. In general, there is no difference in the number of follicle waves during the estrous cycle, however B. indicus have greater antral follicle count, circulating insulin, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) than B. taurus. Moreover, despite of B. taurus having larger ovulatory follicle diameter and maximum CL volume, they have lesser peak circulating estradiol concentrations and lesser circulating progesterone concentrations than B. indicus. We may speculate that there are two main factors related to lesser circulating concentrations of estradiol and progesterone in B. taurus when compared with B. indicus: increased liver metabolism of steroid hormones and lesser production by follicles and CL. Differences between the two genetic groups are also observed with respect to in vitro embryo production because in addition to B. indicus having greater numbers of retrieved oocytes, due to greater antral follicle count, they also have greater percentages of viable oocytes, number of blastocysts, and blastocyst rates when compared with B. taurus. Effects of dietary intake on embryo quality may differ between B. taurus and B. indicus due to different concentrations of circulating insulin and IGF1. For in vivo and in vitro embryo production, an increase in circulating insulin concentrations is negatively associated with oocyte/embryo quality and conception rates. However, this seems to be more pronounced in B. taurus breeds. Differences in ovarian function related or not to nutrition between these two genetic groups are very consistent and may be related to the influence of metabolic hormones such as insulin and IGF1.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bos indicus; Bos taurus; Hormone; Metabolism; Nutrition; Steroid

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27156680     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Effect of calfhood nutrition on metabolic hormones, gonadotropins, and estradiol concentrations and on reproductive organ development in beef heifer calves.

Authors:  Alan K Kelly; Colin Byrne; Mark McGee; George A Perry; Mark A Crowe; Helga Sauerwein; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments: genetic and reproductive considerations.

Authors:  Reinaldo F Cooke; Rodolfo C Cardoso; Ronaldo L A Cerri; G Cliff Lamb; Ky G Pohler; David G Riley; José L M Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments: social, nutritional, and carcass quality considerations.

Authors:  Reinaldo F Cooke; Courtney L Daigle; Philipe Moriel; Stephen B Smith; Luis O Tedeschi; João M B Vendramini
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Luteal color doppler ultrasonography and pregnancy-associated glycoproteins as early pregnancy diagnostic tools and predictors of pregnancy loss in Bos taurus postpartum beef cows.

Authors:  Matthew Patrick Holton; Nicola Oosthuizen; Gabriela Dalmaso de Melo; Dylan Blake Davis; Robert Lawton Stewart; Ky Garret Pohler; Graham Cliff Lamb; Pedro Levy Piza Fontes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Evolution of knowledge on ovarian physiology and its contribution to the widespread application of reproductive biotechnologies in South American cattle.

Authors:  Reuben J Mapletoft; Gabriel A Bó; Pietro S Baruselli; Alejo Menchaca; Roberto Sartori
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Mechanisms regulating follicle selection in ruminants: lessons learned from multiple ovulation models.

Authors:  Alvaro Garcia-Guerra; Milo C Wiltbank; Sarah E Battista; Brian W Kirkpatrick; Roberto Sartori
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.