Literature DB >> 27156114

Action research methodology in clinical pharmacy: how to involve and change.

Lotte Stig Nørgaard1, Ellen Westh Sørensen2.   

Abstract

Introduction The focus in clinical pharmacy practice is and has for the last 30-35 years been on changing the role of pharmacy staff into service orientation and patient counselling. One way of doing this is by involving staff in change process and as a researcher to take part in the change process by establishing partnerships with staff. On the background of the authors' widespread action research (AR)-based experiences, recommendations and comments for how to conduct an AR-study is described, and one of their AR-based studies illustrate the methodology and the research methods used. Methodology AR is defined as an approach to research which is based on a problem-solving relationship between researchers and clients, which aims at both solving a problem and at collaboratively generating new knowledge. Research questions relevant in AR-studies are: what was the working process in this change oriented study? What learning and/or changes took place? What challenges/pitfalls had to be overcome? What were the influence/consequences for the involved parts? When to use If you want to implement new services and want to involve staff and others in the process, an AR methodology is very suitable. The basic advantages of doing AR-based studies are grounded in their participatory and democratic basis and their starting point in problems experienced in practice. Limitations Some of the limitations in AR-studies are that neither of the participants in a project steering group are the only ones to decide. Furthermore, the collective process makes the decision-making procedures relatively complex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action research methodology; Change oriented research; Involvement of participants; Pharmacy practice research; Practice change

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27156114     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0310-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  12 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research.

Authors:  J Meyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-15

2.  Action research: a valuable research technique for service delivery development.

Authors:  Nuttan K Tanna
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-02

3.  A community-based approach to linking injection drug users with needed services through pharmacies: an evaluation of a pilot intervention in New York City.

Authors:  A E Rudolph; K Standish; S Amesty; N D Crawford; R J Stern; W E Badillo; A Boyer; D Brown; N Ranger; J M Garcia Orduna; L Lasenburg; Sarah Lippek; Crystal M Fuller
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2010-06

Review 4.  Participatory action research in antimicrobial stewardship: a novel approach to improving antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals and long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Laura W van Buul; Jonne J Sikkens; Michiel A van Agtmael; Mark H H Kramer; Jenny T van der Steen; Cees M P M Hertogh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Drug-related problems in patients with angina pectoris, type 2 diabetes and asthma--interviewing patients at home.

Authors:  Lotte Stig Haugbølle; Ellen Westh Sørensen
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-10-26

6.  Medication- and illness-related factual knowledge, perceptions and behaviour in angina pectoris patients.

Authors:  Lotte Stig Haugbølle; Ellen Westh Sørensen; Hanne Herborg Henriksen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-08

7.  Using an action research process in pharmacy practice research--a cooperative project between university and internship pharmacies.

Authors:  Ellen Westh Sørensen; Lotte Stig Haugbølle
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2008-12

8.  Basing pharmacy counselling on the perspective of the angina pectoris patient.

Authors:  Lotte Stig Haugbølle; Ellen Westh Sørensen; Birgitte Gundersen; Kirsten Holme Petersen; Lene Lorentzen
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-04

Review 9.  Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice.

Authors:  Justin Jagosh; Ann C Macaulay; Pierre Pluye; Jon Salsberg; Paula L Bush; Jim Henderson; Erin Sirett; Geoff Wong; Margaret Cargo; Carol P Herbert; Sarena D Seifer; Lawrence W Green; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Development of an interprofessional program for cardiovascular prevention in primary care: A participatory research approach.

Authors:  Lyne Lalonde; Johanne Goudreau; Éveline Hudon; Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Céline Bareil; Fabie Duhamel; Lise Lévesque; Alain Turcotte; Gilles Lalonde
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.