S K H Chow1,2, K S Leung1,3, J Qin1, A Guo1, M Sun1, L Qin1,2,3, W H Cheung4,5,6. 1. Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, The People's Republic of China. 2. The CUHK-ACC Space Medicine Centre on Health Maintenance of Musculoskeletal System, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, The People's Republic of China. 3. Translational Medicine Research and Development Center, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, The People's Republic of China. 4. Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, The People's Republic of China. louis@ort.cuhk.edu.hk. 5. The CUHK-ACC Space Medicine Centre on Health Maintenance of Musculoskeletal System, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, The People's Republic of China. louis@ort.cuhk.edu.hk. 6. Translational Medicine Research and Development Center, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, The People's Republic of China. louis@ort.cuhk.edu.hk.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Estrogen receptor (ER) in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic fracture was reported to exhibit delayed expression. Mechanical stimulation enhanced ER-α expression in osteoporotic fracture callus at the tissue level. ER was also found to be required for the effectiveness of vibrational mechanical stimulation treatment in osteoporotic fracture healing. INTRODUCTION: Estrogen receptor(ER) is involved in mechanical signal transduction in bone metabolism. Its expression was reported to be delayed in osteoporotic fracture healing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the roles played by ER during osteoporotic fracture healing enhanced with mechanical stimulation. METHODS: Ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic SD rats that received closed femoral fractures were divided into five groups, (i) SHAM, (ii) SHAM-VT, (iii) OVX, (iv) OVX-VT, and (v) OVX-VT-ICI, where VT stands for whole-body vibration treatment and ICI for ER antagonization by ICI 182,780. Callus formation and gene expression were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postfracture. In vitro osteoblastic differentiation, mineralization, and ER-α expression were assessed. RESULTS: The delayed ER expression was found to be enhanced by vibration treatment. Callus formation enhancement was shown by callus morphometry and micro-CT analysis. Enhancement effects by vibration were partially abolished when ER was modulated by ICI 182,780, in terms of callus formation capacity at 2-4 weeks and ER gene and protein expression at all time points. In vitro, ER expression in osteoblasts was not enhanced by VT treatment, but osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization were enhanced under estrogen-deprived condition. When osteoblastic cells were modulated by ICI 182,780, enhancement effects of VT were eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Vibration was able to enhance ER expression in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic fracture healing. ER was essential in mechanical signal transduction and enhancement in callus formation effects during osteoporotic fracture healing enhanced by vibration. The enhancement of ER-α expression by mechanical stimulation was not likely to be related to the increased expression in osteoblastic cells but rather to the systemic enhancement in recruitment of ER-expressing progenitor cells through increased blood flow and neo-angiogenesis. This finding might explain the observed difference in mechanical sensitivity of osteoporotic fracture to mechanical stimulation.
UNLABELLED: Estrogen receptor (ER) in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic fracture was reported to exhibit delayed expression. Mechanical stimulation enhanced ER-α expression in osteoporotic fracture callus at the tissue level. ER was also found to be required for the effectiveness of vibrational mechanical stimulation treatment in osteoporotic fracture healing. INTRODUCTION:Estrogen receptor(ER) is involved in mechanical signal transduction in bone metabolism. Its expression was reported to be delayed in osteoporotic fracture healing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the roles played by ER during osteoporotic fracture healing enhanced with mechanical stimulation. METHODS: Ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic SDrats that received closed femoral fractures were divided into five groups, (i) SHAM, (ii) SHAM-VT, (iii) OVX, (iv) OVX-VT, and (v) OVX-VT-ICI, where VT stands for whole-body vibration treatment and ICI for ER antagonization by ICI 182,780. Callus formation and gene expression were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postfracture. In vitro osteoblastic differentiation, mineralization, and ER-α expression were assessed. RESULTS: The delayed ER expression was found to be enhanced by vibration treatment. Callus formation enhancement was shown by callus morphometry and micro-CT analysis. Enhancement effects by vibration were partially abolished when ER was modulated by ICI 182,780, in terms of callus formation capacity at 2-4 weeks and ER gene and protein expression at all time points. In vitro, ER expression in osteoblasts was not enhanced by VT treatment, but osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization were enhanced under estrogen-deprived condition. When osteoblastic cells were modulated by ICI 182,780, enhancement effects of VT were eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Vibration was able to enhance ER expression in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic fracture healing. ER was essential in mechanical signal transduction and enhancement in callus formation effects during osteoporotic fracture healing enhanced by vibration. The enhancement of ER-α expression by mechanical stimulation was not likely to be related to the increased expression in osteoblastic cells but rather to the systemic enhancement in recruitment of ER-expressing progenitor cells through increased blood flow and neo-angiogenesis. This finding might explain the observed difference in mechanical sensitivity of osteoporotic fracture to mechanical stimulation.
Authors: T A Owen; M Aronow; V Shalhoub; L M Barone; L Wilming; M S Tassinari; M B Kennedy; S Pockwinse; J B Lian; G S Stein Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Gul Zaman; Helen L Jessop; Mariusz Muzylak; Roberto L De Souza; Andrew A Pitsillides; Joanna S Price; Lance L Lanyon Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Helen L Jessop; Rosemary F L Suswillo; Simon C F Rawlinson; Gul Zaman; Karla Lee; Vicky Das-Gupta; Andrew A Pitsillides; Lance E Lanyon Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Kwok Sui Leung; Hong Fei Shi; Wing Hoi Cheung; Ling Qin; Wai Kin Ng; Kam Fai Tam; Ning Tang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: J Ignacio Aguirre; Lilian I Plotkin; Arancha R Gortazar; Marta Martin Millan; Charles A O'Brien; Stavros C Manolagas; Teresita Bellido Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: R M Y Wong; K C Chong; S W Law; W T Ho; J Li; C S Chui; S K H Chow; W H Cheung Journal: J Orthop Translat Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Eloá Moreira-Marconi; Carla F Dionello; Danielle S Morel; Danubia C Sá-Caputo; Cintia R Souza-Gonçalves; Laisa L Paineiras-Domingos; Eliane O Guedes-Aguiar; Pedro J Marin; Borja Del Pozo Cruz; Mario Bernardo-Filho Journal: Osteoporos Sarcopenia Date: 2016-10-15
Authors: K Jäckle; J P Kolb; A F Schilling; C Schlickewei; M Amling; J M Rueger; W Lehmann Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 2.362