Literature DB >> 27155740

Timing of androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer with a rising PSA (TROG 03.06 and VCOG PR 01-03 [TOAD]): a randomised, multicentre, non-blinded, phase 3 trial.

Gillian M Duchesne1, Henry H Woo2, Julie K Bassett3, Steven J Bowe4, Catherine D'Este5, Mark Frydenberg6, Madeleine King7, Leo Ledwich3, Andrew Loblaw8, Shawn Malone9, Jeremy Millar10, Roger Milne3, Rosemary G Smith3, Nigel Spry11, Martin Stockler12, Rodney A Syme13, Keen Hun Tai14, Sandra Turner15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Androgen-deprivation therapy is offered to men with prostate cancer who have a rising prostate-specific antigen after curative therapy (PSA relapse) or who are considered not suitable for curative treatment; however, the optimal timing for its introduction is uncertain. We aimed to assess whether immediate androgen-deprivation therapy improves overall survival compared with delayed therapy.
METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, phase 3, non-blinded trial, we recruited men through 29 oncology centres in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. Men with prostate cancer were eligible if they had a PSA relapse after previous attempted curative therapy (radiotherapy or surgery, with or without postoperative radiotherapy) or if they were not considered suitable for curative treatment (because of age, comorbidity, or locally advanced disease). We used a database-embedded, dynamically balanced, randomisation algorithm, coordinated by the Cancer Council Victoria, to randomly assign participants (1:1) to immediate androgen-deprivation therapy (immediate therapy arm) or to delayed androgen-deprivation therapy (delayed therapy arm) with a recommended interval of at least 2 years unless clinically contraindicated. Randomisation for participants with PSA relapse was stratified by type of previous therapy, relapse-free interval, and PSA doubling time; randomisation for those with non-curative disease was stratified by metastatic status; and randomisation in both groups was stratified by planned treatment schedule (continuous or intermittent) and treatment centre. Clinicians could prescribe any form and schedule of androgen-deprivation therapy and group assignment was not masked. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial closed to accrual in 2012 after review by the independent data monitoring committee, but data collection continued for 18 months until Feb 26, 2014. It is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12606000301561) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00110162).
FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2004, and July 13, 2012, we recruited 293 men (261 with PSA relapse and 32 with non-curable disease). We randomly assigned 142 men to the immediate therapy arm and 151 to the delayed therapy arm. Median follow-up was 5 years (IQR 3·3-6·2) from the date of randomisation. 16 (11%) men died in the immediate therapy arm and 30 (20%) died in the delayed therapy arm. 5-year overall survival was 86·4% (95% CI 78·5-91·5) in the delayed therapy arm versus 91·2% (84·2-95·2) in the immediate therapy arm (log-rank p=0·047). After Cox regression, the unadjusted HR for overall survival for immediate versus delayed arm assignment was 0·55 (95% CI 0·30-1·00; p=0·050). 23 patients had grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. 105 (36%) men had adverse events requiring hospital admission; none of these events were attributable to treatment or differed between treatment-timing groups. The most common serious adverse events were cardiovascular, which occurred in nine (6%) patients in the delayed therapy arm and 13 (9%) in the immediate therapy arm.
INTERPRETATION: Immediate receipt of androgen-deprivation therapy significantly improved overall survival compared with delayed intervention in men with PSA-relapsed or non-curable prostate cancer. The results provide benchmark evidence of survival rates and morbidity to discuss with men when considering their treatment options. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and Cancer Councils, The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Mayne Pharma Australia.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27155740     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00107-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  53 in total

1.  College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grading System for Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Chen; Li-Li Feng; Ming Li; Huai-Qiang Ju; Yi Ding; Mei Lan; Shu-Mei Song; Wei-Dong Han; Li Yu; Ming-Biao Wei; Xiao-Lin Pang; Fang He; Shuai Liu; Jian Zheng; Yan Ma; Chu-Yang Lin; Ping Lan; Mei-Jin Huang; Yi-Feng Zou; Zu-Li Yang; Ting Wang; Jin-Yi Lang; Guy R Orangio; Vitaliy Poylin; Jaffer A Ajani; Wei-Hu Wang; Xiang-Bo Wan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-02-22

2.  [No evidence for improved outcome with salvage radiotherapy for asymptomatic biochemical prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy by additive androgen suppression].

Authors:  Helena Garcia Schüler; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Metronomic cyclophosphamide therapy in hormone-naive patients with non-metastatic biochemical recurrent prostate cancer: a phase II trial.

Authors:  Fabien Calcagno; Guillaume Mouillet; Olivier Adotevi; Tristan Maurina; Thierry Nguyen; Philippe Montcuquet; E Curtit; F Kleinclauss; Xavier Pivot; Christophe Borg; Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Prostate cancer: ADT after radical prostatectomy - when and how?

Authors:  Louise Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  HSD3B1 and resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: a retrospective, multicohort study.

Authors:  Jason W D Hearn; Ghada AbuAli; Chad A Reichard; Chandana A Reddy; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Kai-Hsiung Chang; Rachel Carlson; Laureano Rangel; Kevin Reagan; Brian J Davis; R Jeffrey Karnes; Manish Kohli; Donald Tindall; Eric A Klein; Nima Sharifi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Mortality and Androgen Deprivation Therapy as Salvage Treatment for Biochemical Recurrence after Primary Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alex Z Fu; Huei-Ting Tsai; Reina Haque; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Nancy L Keating; Matthew R Smith; Yingjun Zhou; David S Aaronson; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Phase II Trial of a DNA Vaccine Encoding Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (pTVG-HP [MVI-816]) in Patients With Progressive, Nonmetastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas G McNeel; Jens C Eickhoff; Laura E Johnson; Alison R Roth; Timothy G Perk; Lawrence Fong; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Ellen Wargowski; Robert Jeraj; Glenn Liu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy to biochemical recurrence after external beam radiotherapy: a phase 3 GICOR study.

Authors:  F Casas; I Henríquez; A Bejar; X Maldonado; A Alvarez; C González-Sansegundo; A Boladeras; F Ferrer; A Hervás; I Herruzo; M Caro; I Rodriguez; C Ferrer
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  A Framework for Treatment Decision Making at Prostate Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Jane M Lange; Bruce J Trock; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 10.  Management Options for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Farhad Fakhrejahani; Ravi A Madan; William L Dahut
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.