Literature DB >> 27155608

Will the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Improve Racial/Ethnic Disparity of Eye Examination Among US Working-Age Population with Diabetes?

Qian Shi1, Vivian Fonseca2, Marie Krousel-Wood3, Yingnan Zhao4, Frank P Nellans1, Qingyang Luo5, Lizheng Shi6.   

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the racial/ethnic disparity of eye examination rates among US adults with diabetes before and after the ACA. Working-age adults (18-64 years) with diabetes for years 2014-2017 were simulated by bootstrapping from the working-age diabetes patient sample of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Household Component 2011. Insurance coverage rates were separately predicted for each racial/ethnic group based on the Congressional Budgeting Office (CBO) report in 2014 and the proportions of Medicaid eligibility. Eye examination rates were weighted to national estimates and compared between racial/ethnic groups. Confidence intervals were estimated using the bootstrap percentile method. Health insurance coverage after the ACA is projected to increase from 90.23 % in 2011 to 98.33 % in 2014 among non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), reaching 98.96 % in 2017. Minorities are forecasted to have about 15 % expansion of insurance coverage from 2011 (80.65 %) to 2014 (96.00 %), reaching 97.25 % in 2017. In 2011, 63.01 % of NHW had eye examinations with forecasted increase to 65.83 % in 2014 and 66.05 % in 2017, while the eye examination rate in the minorities will increase from 55.75 % in 2011 to 59.23 % in 2014 and remain at 59.48 % in 2017. Therefore, racial disparity in eye examination rates is forecasted to persist (ranging from 6.57 % in 2017 to 6.69 % in 2016). The ACA is projected to improve the eye examination rate along with the expansion in insurance coverage. Although predicted racial/ethnic disparities will improve, some differences will persist. Comprehensive strategies need to be developed to eliminate the disparity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affordable Care Act; Diabetes; Eye examination; Racial disparity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27155608     DOI: 10.1007/s11892-016-0749-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diab Rep        ISSN: 1534-4827            Impact factor:   4.810


  22 in total

1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Community residential segregation and the local supply of federally qualified health centers.

Authors:  Michelle Ko; Ninez A Ponce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The subspecialty training, practice type, and geographical distribution of recently trained ophthalmologists: a study of male and female physicians.

Authors:  M S Gable; J D Mohr; T P O'Brien; P Lee; A Colenbrander; K Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2000

4.  Diabetic retinopathy screening in patients with diabetes mellitus in primary care: Incentives and barriers to screening attendance.

Authors:  K N D van Eijk; J W Blom; J Gussekloo; B C P Polak; Y Groeneveld
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Eye care for elderly Americans with diabetes mellitus. Failure to meet current guidelines.

Authors:  F Wang; J C Javitt
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States.

Authors:  John H Kempen; Benita J O'Colmain; M Cristina Leske; Steven M Haffner; Ronald Klein; Scot E Moss; Hugh R Taylor; Richard F Hamman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

7.  Is the risk of diabetic retinopathy greater in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites with type 2 diabetes? A U.S. population study.

Authors:  M I Harris; R Klein; C C Cowie; M Rowland; D D Byrd-Holt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  J C Javitt; L P Aiello
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform.

Authors:  J C Javitt; L P Aiello; Y Chiang; F L Ferris; J K Canner; S Greenfield
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Racial and ethnic differences in diabetes care and health care use and costs.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Lee; Chuan-Fen Liu; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Jusung Lee; Timothy Callaghan; Marcia Ory; Hongwei Zhao; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Impact of the affordable care act on utilization of benefits of eye care and primary care examinations.

Authors:  Yi Pang; Zhiyong Ren; Jingyun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Telehealth Encourages Patients with Diabetes in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups to Return for in-Person Ophthalmic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  David J Ramsey; Claudia C Lasalle; Sidrah Anjum; Jeffrey L Marx; Shiyoung Roh
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-04

4.  Funding of Hispanic/Latino Health-Related Research by the National Institutes of Health: An Analysis of the Portfolio of Research Program Grants on Six Health Topic Areas.

Authors:  M Larissa Avilés-Santa; Laura Hsu; Tram Kim Lam; S Sonia Arteaga; Ligia Artiles; Sean Coady; Lawton S Cooper; Jennifer Curry; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Holly L Nicastro; Adelaida Rosario
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.