Literature DB >> 27155592

Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions.

Christoph Frank Dietrich1, Anand Vasante Sahai2, Mirko D'Onofrio3, Uwe Will4, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono5, Maria Chiara Petrone5, Michael Hocke6, Barbara Braden7, Eike Burmester8, Kathleen Möller9, Adrian Săftoiu10, Andre Ignee11, Xin-Wu Cui1, Sevastita Iordache12, Andrej Potthoff13, Julio Iglesias-Garcia14, Pietro Fusaroli15, Yi Dong16, Christian Jenssen17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically diagnosed at a late stage. Little is known about the incidental finding of early-stage PDAC. The aim of the current study was to determine the etiology of small solid pancreatic lesions (≤15 mm) to optimize clinical management.
METHODS: Inclusion criterion for the retrospective study analysis was the incidental finding of primarily undetermined small solid pancreatic lesions ≤15 mm in 394 asymptomatic patients. Final diagnoses were based on histology or cytology obtained by imaging-guided biopsy (and at least 12-month follow-up) and/or surgery. Contrast-enhanced US or contrast-enhanced EUS was performed in 219 patients.
RESULTS: The final diagnoses of 394 patients were as follows: 146 PDACs, 156 neuroendocrine tumors, 28 metastases into the pancreas from other primary sites, and 64 various other etiologies. Contrast-enhanced US allowed differential diagnosis of PDAC and non-PDAC in 189 of 219 patients (86%).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients with small solid pancreatic lesions had very early stage PDAC. Approximately 60% of small solid pancreatic lesions ≤15 mm are not PDAC and, therefore, do not require radical surgery. Without preoperative diagnosis, an unacceptably large proportion of patients would be exposed to radical surgery with significant morbidity and mortality.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27155592     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

Review 1.  Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Andrada Seicean; Ofelia Mosteanu; Radu Seicean
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in clinical acute and emergency medicine and critical care (CEUS Acute) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGK, ÖGUM, SGUM and DEGUM].

Authors:  Guido Michels; Rudolf Horn; Andreas Helfen; Andreas Hagendorff; Christian Jung; Beatrice Hoffmann; Natalie Jaspers; Horst Kinkel; Clemens-Alexander Greim; Fabian Knebel; Johann Bauersachs; Hans-Jörg Busch; Daniel Kiefl; Alexander O Spiel; Gernot Marx; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Enhancement patterns in the venous phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasounds: diagnostic value for patients with solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Xueqi Chen; Fengzhi Hao; Yang Gui; Jing Zhang; Li Tan; Mengsu Xiao; Qing Zhang; Hua Meng; Jianchu Li; Yuxin Jiang; Ke Lv
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

Review 4.  Non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Surgery or observation?

Authors:  Yehonatan Bar-Moshe; Haggi Mazeh; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-04-16

5.  B-mode and contrast-enhancement characteristics of small nonincidental neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Barbara Braden; Christian Jenssen; Mirko D'Onofrio; Michael Hocke; Uwe Will; Kathleen Möller; Andre Ignee; Yi Dong; Xin-Wu Cui; Adrian Sãftoiu; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

6.  Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen: A Diagnosis Not to Forget!

Authors:  Susana Marques; Miguel Bispo; Lariño Noia
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13

7.  The resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: To FNA or not to FNA? A diagnostic dilemma, introduction.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 8.  Serous pancreatic neoplasia, data and review.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Yi Dong; Christian Jenssen; Valentina Ciaravino; Michael Hocke; Wen-Ping Wang; Eike Burmester; Kathleen Moeller; Nathan Ss Atkinson; Paola Capelli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of small focal solid pancreatic lesions: A must!

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Eike Burmester
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

10.  The resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: To FNA or not to FNA? A diagnostic dilemma, FNA pros.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Livia Archibugi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.