Literature DB >> 27154781

Lipid Management Guidelines from the Departments of Veteran Affairs and Defense: A Critique.

Catherine S Bennet1, Chanukya R Dahagam2, Salim S Virani3, Seth S Martin4, Roger S Blumenthal4, Erin D Michos4, John W McEvoy5.   

Abstract

In December 2014, the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense (VA/DoD) published an independent clinical practice guideline for the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risk, adding to the myriad of recently published guidelines on this topic. The VA/DoD guidelines differ from major US guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association in 2013 in the following ways: recommending moderate-intensity statins for the majority of patients with statin indications regardless of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk; advocating for limited on-treatment lipid monitoring; and deemphasizing ancillary data, such as coronary artery calcium testing, to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimation. In the context of manifold treatment recommendations from numerous guideline committees, the VA/DoD recommendations may generate further confusion and mixed messages among healthcare providers about the optimal treatment of dyslipidemia. In this review, we critically appraise the VA/DoD recommendations with a focus on the evidence base for each area where the VA/DoD guidelines differ from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. We also call for harmonization of lipid treatment guidelines to ensure high-quality and consistent care for patients with, and at risk for, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; Coronary artery calcium; Dyslipidemia; Guidelines; Veterans Affairs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154781     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  4 in total

Review 1.  Statins for Primary Prevention in Those Aged 70 Years and Older: A Critical Review of Recent Cholesterol Guidelines.

Authors:  Chelsea E Hawley; John Roefaro; Daniel E Forman; Ariela R Orkaby
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Thomas F Whayne; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Is There an Ideal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level? Confusion regarding Lipid Guidelines, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets, and Medical Management.

Authors:  Thomas F Whayne
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-12-12

4.  Differential Impact of Aging on Cardiovascular Risk in Women Military Service Members.

Authors:  Xiaofei Chen; Bala Ramanan; Shirling Tsai; Haekyung Jeon-Slaughter
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.