Literature DB >> 27154507

Prevalence, recovery patterns and predictors of quality of life and costs after non-fatal injury: the Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS) study.

M A C de Jongh1,2, N Kruithof1, T Gosens1,3, C L P van de Ree1, L de Munter1, L Brouwers2, S Polinder4, K W W Lansink1,2,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a major public health problem worldwide that leads to high medical and societal costs. Overall, improved understanding of the full spectrum of the societal impact and burden of injury is needed. The main purpose of the Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS) study is to provide insight into prevalence, predictors and recovery patterns of short-term and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs after injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, follow-up cohort study in which HRQoL, psychological, social and functional outcome, and costs after trauma will be assessed during 24 months follow-up within injured patients admitted in 1 of 10 hospitals in the county Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands. Data will be collected by self-reported questionnaires at 1 week (including preinjury assessment), and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after injury. If patients are not capable of filling out the questionnaires, proxies will be asked to participate. Also, information about mechanism and severity of injury, comorbidity and indirect and direct costs will be collected. Mixed models will be used to examine the course of HRQoL, functional and psychological outcome, costs over time and between different groups, and to identify predictors for poor or good outcome. RELEVANCE: This study should make a substantial contribution to the international collaborative effort to assess the societal impact and burden of injuries more accurately. The BIOS results will also be used to develop an outcome prediction model for outcome evaluation including, besides the classic fatal, non-fatal outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02508675. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome of Injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154507     DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and quality of life after pelvic fractures. The Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS) study.

Authors:  L Brouwers; M A C de Jongh; L de Munter; M Edwards; K W W Lansink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The long-term outcomes and health-related quality of life of patients following blunt thoracic injury: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Edward Baker; Andreas Xyrichis; Christine Norton; Philip Hopkins; Geraldine Lee
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The development and internal validation of a model to predict functional recovery after trauma.

Authors:  Max W de Graaf; Inge H F Reininga; Erik Heineman; Mostafa El Moumni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of frailty on quality of life in elderly patients after hip fracture: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Cornelis L P van de Ree; Maud J F Landers; Nena Kruithof; Leonie de Munter; Joris P J Slaets; Taco Gosens; Mariska A C de Jongh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Health status and psychological outcomes after trauma: A prospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Nena Kruithof; Suzanne Polinder; Leonie de Munter; Cornelis L P van de Ree; Koen W W Lansink; Mariska A C de Jongh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Correspondence of directly reported and recalled health-related quality of life in a large heterogeneous sample of trauma patients.

Authors:  I Spronk; A J L M Geraerds; G J Bonsel; M A C de Jongh; S Polinder; J A Haagsma
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Siddarth Daniels David; Nobhojit Roy; Harris Solomon; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg; Martin Gerdin Wärnberg
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-08-09

8.  Care-related Quality of Life of informal caregivers of the elderly after a hip fracture.

Authors:  Cornelis L P van de Ree; Kari Ploegsma; Tim A Kanters; Jan A Roukema; Mariska A C De Jongh; Taco Gosens
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-03

9.  Conventional and retrospective change in health-related quality of life of trauma patients: an explorative observational follow-up study.

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; Inge Spronk; Mariska A C de Jongh; Gouke J Bonsel; Suzanne Polinder
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Prognostic factors for medical and productivity costs, and return to work after trauma.

Authors:  Leonie de Munter; A J L M Geraerds; Mariska A C de Jongh; Marjolein van der Vlegel; Ewout W Steyerberg; Juanita A Haagsma; Suzanne Polinder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.