H Susan J Picavet1, Ivon Milder2, Hanneke Kruize3, Sjerp de Vries4, Tia Hermans5, Wanda Wendel-Vos2. 1. Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands. Electronic address: susan.picavet@rivm.nl. 2. Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands. 3. Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands. 4. Alterra, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Cultural Geography, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 5. Alterra, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence is emerging that more green space in the living environment is associated with better health, partly via the pathway of physical activity. OBJECTIVES: We explored the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between green space and physical activity and several health indicators in the Doetinchem Cohort Study. METHODS: A random sample of men and women aged 20-59years at baseline was measured max 5 times with 5year-intervals in the period 1987-2012. Data of round 3-5 were used. Measurements were based on examinations (height, weight, blood pressure) or questionnaires (physical activity, perceived health, depressive symptoms, chronic conditions). The percentage of green space (mainly urban and agricultural green) around the home address (125m and 1km) was calculated using satellite data. RESULTS: More agricultural green was associated with less time spent on bicycling (β1km=-0.15, 95%CL -0.13; -0.04) and sports (β1km=-0.04, 95%CL -0.07; -0.01) and more time spent on gardening (β1km=0.16, 95%CL 0.12; 0.19) and odd jobs (β1km=0.10, 95%CL 0.05; 0.15), and this was in the other direction for urban green. For only a few of the many health indicators a positive association with green was found, and mainly for total green within 1km radius. Longstanding green or a transition to more green did not show more pronounced associations with health. CONCLUSIONS: For the green space range of the Doetinchem area the findings do not strongly support the hypothesis that the percentage of green in the living environment affects health positively. The distinction by type of green may, however, be relevant for physical activity.
BACKGROUND: Evidence is emerging that more green space in the living environment is associated with better health, partly via the pathway of physical activity. OBJECTIVES: We explored the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between green space and physical activity and several health indicators in the Doetinchem Cohort Study. METHODS: A random sample of men and women aged 20-59years at baseline was measured max 5 times with 5year-intervals in the period 1987-2012. Data of round 3-5 were used. Measurements were based on examinations (height, weight, blood pressure) or questionnaires (physical activity, perceived health, depressive symptoms, chronic conditions). The percentage of green space (mainly urban and agricultural green) around the home address (125m and 1km) was calculated using satellite data. RESULTS: More agricultural green was associated with less time spent on bicycling (β1km=-0.15, 95%CL -0.13; -0.04) and sports (β1km=-0.04, 95%CL -0.07; -0.01) and more time spent on gardening (β1km=0.16, 95%CL 0.12; 0.19) and odd jobs (β1km=0.10, 95%CL 0.05; 0.15), and this was in the other direction for urban green. For only a few of the many health indicators a positive association with green was found, and mainly for total green within 1km radius. Longstanding green or a transition to more green did not show more pronounced associations with health. CONCLUSIONS: For the green space range of the Doetinchem area the findings do not strongly support the hypothesis that the percentage of green in the living environment affects health positively. The distinction by type of green may, however, be relevant for physical activity.
Authors: Carla P Bezold; Rachel F Banay; Brent A Coull; Jaime E Hart; Peter James; Laura D Kubzansky; Stacey A Missmer; Francine Laden Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Claudia Fongar; Geir Aamodt; Thomas B Randrup; Ingjerd Solfjeld Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.390