Literature DB >> 27153711

Simulated single molecule microscopy with SMeagol.

Martin Lindén1, Vladimir Ćurić1, Alexis Boucharin1, David Fange1, Johan Elf1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: SMeagol is a software tool to simulate highly realistic microscopy data based on spatial systems biology models, in order to facilitate development, validation and optimization of advanced analysis methods for live cell single molecule microscopy data.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SMeagol runs on Matlab R2014 and later, and uses compiled binaries in C for reaction-diffusion simulations. Documentation, source code and binaries for Mac OS, Windows and Ubuntu Linux can be downloaded from http://smeagol.sourceforge.net CONTACT: johan.elf@icm.uu.se SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27153711      PMCID: PMC4965627          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


Recent advances in single particle tracking (SPT) microscopy (Manley ) make it possible to obtain tens of thousands macromolecular trajectories from within a living cell in just a few minutes. Since molecules typically change their movement properties upon interactions, these trajectories contain information about both locations and rates of intracellular reactions. This information is unfortunately obscured by physical limitations of the optical microscope and noise in detection systems, making statistical methods development for SPT analysis a very active research field. Unbiased testing and comparison of such methods are however difficult given the absence of in vivo data of intracellular dynamics where the true states of interaction are known, a.k.a. the ‘ground truth’. A common resort is to instead use simulated, synthetic, data. However, tests using such data give unrealistically optimistic results if the simplifying assumptions underlying the analysis method are exactly satisfied. The need for realistic simulations is long recognized in microscopy and systems biology (Andrews, 2012; Chenouard ; Cox ; Fange ; Fullerton ; Kerr ; Sage ; Sinkó ; Slepchenko ; Takahashi ), but systematic combinations of the two are only currently emerging (Angiolini ; Watabe ). We present the SMeagol package, that has been developed to generate highly realistic single molecule microscopy time-lapse image series aimed primarily at single particle tracking applications. The purpose of SMeagol is to enable realistic comparisons between the output of advanced analysis methods and known ground truth. SMeagol includes an extended MesoRD (Fange ) version for simulation of 3D diffusion in cellular compartments, diffusion limited reaction kinetics, surface adsorption, reactions in membranes and other complex aspects of reaction diffusion kinetics that do occur in cells, but are not considered in SPT analysis algorithms. In addition to the molecules’ trajectories, SMeagol integrates the 3D point spread function of the microscope, the kinetics of photo-activation, blinking and bleaching of the simulated fluorophores, background noise and camera specific parameters (Fig. 1, movie S1 and S2). Great flexibility is allowed by the possibility to supply these characteristic parameters either as tabulated experimental data for a particular optical setup, or as theoretical models. The combination of using reaction diffusion kinetics in cellular geometries and physics-based simulations of the emission and detection processes makes the images more realistic than the synthetic data used for example by Chenouard ).
Fig. 1.

Simulated microscopy with SMeagol. (a) Workflow from stochastic reaction–diffusion simulations to images. (b) The microscopy simulation starts from trajectories generated by stochastic reaction–diffusion simulations, fills in stochastic motion and photon emission events between the trajectory points, and finally combines PSF and camera noise models to simulate realistic images. (c) Simulated microscopy of fluorescently labeled MinE proteins in the Min oscillatory system. Left: Stochastic reaction–diffusion simulation. Mid columns: Simulated SPT microscopy using an actual experimental background noise movie with continuous illumination and 4 ms/frame. Right: A simulation of continuous illumination and 1 s/frame renders a conventional (non-single molecule) fluorescence microscopy time-lapse movie. See also Supplementary movies S1, S2 and the Supplementary material for further details (Color version of this figure is available at Bioinformatics online.)

Simulated microscopy with SMeagol. (a) Workflow from stochastic reaction–diffusion simulations to images. (b) The microscopy simulation starts from trajectories generated by stochastic reaction–diffusion simulations, fills in stochastic motion and photon emission events between the trajectory points, and finally combines PSF and camera noise models to simulate realistic images. (c) Simulated microscopy of fluorescently labeled MinE proteins in the Min oscillatory system. Left: Stochastic reaction–diffusion simulation. Mid columns: Simulated SPT microscopy using an actual experimental background noise movie with continuous illumination and 4 ms/frame. Right: A simulation of continuous illumination and 1 s/frame renders a conventional (non-single molecule) fluorescence microscopy time-lapse movie. See also Supplementary movies S1, S2 and the Supplementary material for further details (Color version of this figure is available at Bioinformatics online.) SMeagol can be used to optimize imaging conditions for specific systems in silico and to benchmark methods for SPT analysis in analogy with the methods that has been developed to benchmark localization methods for non-moving single particles (Sage ). In the supplementary material, we explore the robustness against localization errors and motional blur of the vbSPT software, which extracts multi-state diffusive models from SPT data (Persson ), and find that these effects can induce overfitting under certain conditions. In addition, we provide a number of examples highlighting possibilities, limitation and computational requirements of the SMeagol simulation engine. When combined with increasingly refined simulations of intracellular processes, photo-physics and optics; live-cell microscopy is moving closer to methods in fundamental physics, where combined simulation of physical processes and detection systems have guided experimental design and data analysis for a long time. Click here for additional data file.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Computational cell biology: spatiotemporal simulation of cellular events.

Authors:  Boris M Slepchenko; James C Schaff; John H Carson; Leslie M Loew
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001-10-25

2.  Spatial and stochastic cellular modeling with the Smoldyn simulator.

Authors:  Steven S Andrews
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

3.  High-density mapping of single-molecule trajectories with photoactivated localization microscopy.

Authors:  Suliana Manley; Jennifer M Gillette; George H Patterson; Hari Shroff; Harald F Hess; Eric Betzig; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-01-13       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Spatio-temporal correlations can drastically change the response of a MAPK pathway.

Authors:  Koichi Takahashi; Sorin Tanase-Nicola; Pieter Rein ten Wolde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Exploring the dynamics of cell processes through simulations of fluorescence microscopy experiments.

Authors:  Juan Angiolini; Nicolas Plachta; Esteban Mocskos; Valeria Levi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  MesoRD 1.0: Stochastic reaction-diffusion simulations in the microscopic limit.

Authors:  David Fange; Anel Mahmutovic; Johan Elf
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Extracting intracellular diffusive states and transition rates from single-molecule tracking data.

Authors:  Fredrik Persson; Martin Lindén; Cecilia Unoson; Johan Elf
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  TestSTORM: Simulator for optimizing sample labeling and image acquisition in localization based super-resolution microscopy.

Authors:  József Sinkó; Róbert Kákonyi; Eric Rees; Daniel Metcalf; Alex E Knight; Clemens F Kaminski; Gábor Szabó; Miklós Erdélyi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  FAST MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHODS FOR BIOLOGICAL REACTION-DIFFUSION SYSTEMS IN SOLUTION AND ON SURFACES.

Authors:  Rex A Kerr; Thomas M Bartol; Boris Kaminsky; Markus Dittrich; Jen-Chien Jack Chang; Scott B Baden; Terrence J Sejnowski; Joel R Stiles
Journal:  SIAM J Sci Comput       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.

Authors:  Nicolas Chenouard; Ihor Smal; Fabrice de Chaumont; Martin Maška; Ivo F Sbalzarini; Yuanhao Gong; Janick Cardinale; Craig Carthel; Stefano Coraluppi; Mark Winter; Andrew R Cohen; William J Godinez; Karl Rohr; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Liang Liang; James Duncan; Hongying Shen; Yingke Xu; Klas E G Magnusson; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux; Philippe Roudot; Charles Kervrann; François Waharte; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Spencer L Shorte; Joost Willemse; Katherine Celler; Gilles P van Wezel; Han-Wei Dan; Yuh-Show Tsai; Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Erik Meijering
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  5 in total

1.  Unraveling the Thousand Word Picture: An Introduction to Super-Resolution Data Analysis.

Authors:  Antony Lee; Konstantinos Tsekouras; Christopher Calderon; Carlos Bustamante; Steve Pressé
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Variational Algorithms for Analyzing Noisy Multistate Diffusion Trajectories.

Authors:  Martin Lindén; Johan Elf
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Pointwise error estimates in localization microscopy.

Authors:  Martin Lindén; Vladimir Ćurić; Elias Amselem; Johan Elf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Spatiotemporal kinetics of the SRP pathway in live E. coli cells.

Authors:  Ivan L Volkov; Erik Lundin; Kalle Kipper; Mikhail Metelev; Spartak Zikrin; Magnus Johansson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  tRNA tracking for direct measurements of protein synthesis kinetics in live cells.

Authors:  Ivan L Volkov; Martin Lindén; Javier Aguirre Rivera; Ka-Weng Ieong; Mikhail Metelev; Johan Elf; Magnus Johansson
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 15.040

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.