Literature DB >> 27153697

FRAGSION: ultra-fast protein fragment library generation by IOHMM sampling.

Debswapna Bhattacharya1, Badri Adhikari1, Jilong Li1, Jianlin Cheng2.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Speed, accuracy and robustness of building protein fragment library have important implications in de novo protein structure prediction since fragment-based methods are one of the most successful approaches in template-free modeling (FM). Majority of the existing fragment detection methods rely on database-driven search strategies to identify candidate fragments, which are inherently time-consuming and often hinder the possibility to locate longer fragments due to the limited sizes of databases. Also, it is difficult to alleviate the effect of noisy sequence-based predicted features such as secondary structures on the quality of fragment.
RESULTS: Here, we present FRAGSION, a database-free method to efficiently generate protein fragment library by sampling from an Input-Output Hidden Markov Model. FRAGSION offers some unique features compared to existing approaches in that it (i) is lightning-fast, consuming only few seconds of CPU time to generate fragment library for a protein of typical length (300 residues); (ii) can generate dynamic-size fragments of any length (even for the whole protein sequence) and (iii) offers ways to handle noise in predicted secondary structure during fragment sampling. On a FM dataset from the most recent Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction, we demonstrate that FGRAGSION provides advantages over the state-of-the-art fragment picking protocol of ROSETTA suite by speeding up computation by several orders of magnitude while achieving comparable performance in fragment quality.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and executable versions of FRAGSION for Linux and MacOS is freely available to non-commercial users at http://sysbio.rnet.missouri.edu/FRAGSION/ It is bundled with a manual and example data. CONTACT: chengji@missouri.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27153697      PMCID: PMC4920111          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  11 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Protein decoy assembly using short fragments under geometric constraints.

Authors:  R Kolodny; M Levitt
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

5.  HHfrag: HMM-based fragment detection using HHpred.

Authors:  Ivan Kalev; Michael Habeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Protein bioinformatics and mixtures of bivariate von Mises distributions for angular data.

Authors:  Kanti V Mardia; Charles C Taylor; Ganesh K Subramaniam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure.

Authors:  Wouter Boomsma; Kanti V Mardia; Charles C Taylor; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Anders Krogh; Thomas Hamelryck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Kooperberg; E Huang; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Generalized fragment picking in Rosetta: design, protocols and applications.

Authors:  Dominik Gront; Daniel W Kulp; Robert M Vernon; Charlie E M Strauss; David Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias.

Authors:  Thomas Hamelryck; John T Kent; Anders Krogh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  Enhanced GROMACS: toward a better numerical simulation framework.

Authors:  Hojjat Rakhshani; Effat Dehghanian; Amin Rahati
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Deep learning methods for protein torsion angle prediction.

Authors:  Haiou Li; Jie Hou; Badri Adhikari; Qiang Lyu; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Enhancing fragment-based protein structure prediction by customising fragment cardinality according to local secondary structure.

Authors:  Jad Abbass; Jean-Christophe Nebel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.