Literature DB >> 27153624

DyNet: visualization and analysis of dynamic molecular interaction networks.

Ivan H Goenawan1, Kenneth Bryan1, David J Lynn2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: : The ability to experimentally determine molecular interactions on an almost proteome-wide scale under different conditions is enabling researchers to move from static to dynamic network analysis, uncovering new insights into how interaction networks are physically rewired in response to different stimuli and in disease. Dynamic interaction data presents a special challenge in network biology. Here, we present DyNet, a Cytoscape application that provides a range of functionalities for the visualization, real-time synchronization and analysis of large multi-state dynamic molecular interaction networks enabling users to quickly identify and analyze the most 'rewired' nodes across many network states.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DyNet is available at the Cytoscape (3.2+) App Store (http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/dynet). CONTACT: david.lynn@sahmri.com SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27153624      PMCID: PMC5013899          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 Introduction

Network biology is a rapidly developing area of research, which recognizes that cellular processes are controlled and coordinated at multiple different levels by tightly regulated molecular networks. This cellular ‘interactome’ is a highly dynamic entity, dependent on an array of temporal, spatial, cellular and environmental signals (Barrios-Rodiles ; Przytycka ). Understanding how molecular interaction networks change in their composition and connectivity in response to these cellular cues is crucial to understanding complex emergent phenotypes in health and disease (Barabási ; Bowler ). Sahni et al. (2015), for example have shown that two thirds of disease-associated alleles perturb protein–protein interactions (PPIs). Until recently, most studies investigating the dynamics of PPI networks inferred dynamic network states through the integration of static maps of the interactome with state-specific information, such as gene expression or genetic interaction data (Fischer ; Will and Helms, 2015). Fortunately, advances in Mass Spectrometry are now enabling high-throughput studies that directly investigate PPI network dynamics (Ideker and Krogan, 2012). Recently, for example researchers have mapped the Hippo signaling pathway PPI network and revealed how changes in protein phosphorylation result in a significant rewiring of the interactions between members of this pathway (Couzens ). Dynamic interaction data presents a special challenge in network visualization and current software tools are limited in their ability to visualize and analyze this type of data. The DynNetwork Cytoscape application (http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/dynnetwork), for example uses animation to visualize changes in networks over time/conditions. While fun, this approach is of limited practical utility especially for larger or highly dynamic networks and the user can quickly lose track of the nodes/edges of interest. This approach also lacks statistical measures to support the detection and quantification of network rewiring. The kDDN approach (Tian ) is more advanced statistically but lacks integration with advanced network visualization tools and is limited to the comparative analysis of only two network states. Here, we present DyNet, a Cytoscape application that provides a range of functionalities for the visualization and analysis of large multi-state dynamic molecular interaction networks and the identification of the most rewired nodes.

2 Approach

DyNet represents a dynamic network as a set of state graphs (one for each condition, time-point, etc.) and provides a new Cytoscape feature to import multiple graph files in an automated manner. Once imported, the initial network layout (which can be chosen from any Cytoscape layout algorithm), and any subsequent editing, of each state graph is managed and synchronized in real-time via a central reference network (constructed from the union of all states). This means that corresponding nodes and edges will always be located in the same relative positions in each graph view, even during user editing (e.g. dragging, zooming, moving a node), thus making it easier for a user to visually compare graph states and keep track of the changes in nodes/edges of interest across large, many-state dynamic networks. The central reference network also fulfils a second role as a canvas for the visualization of comparative node/edge statistics (see Fig. 1). DyNet provides two principal modes of analysis; one for pairwise (N  =  2) comparisons and the other for comparisons of multiple (N  >  2) network states. Each mode supports the visualization of node/edge changes, based on their presence/absence or the value of a selected numeric attribute (e.g. node abundance, edge weight), across networks (Fig. 1). When comparing numeric attributes between two networks (pairwise mode), DyNet calculates the log2 fold-change of the attribute value. When comparing more than two networks a different approach must be taken to produce a summary statistic of node/edge rewiring. Here, we calculate the normalized variance for the numeric attribute across all networks. In either case, the resulting score is used to highlight the most variable nodes and edges on the central reference network, using a color gradient, and added as an attribute in Cytoscape’s table view. Additionally, we also define a rewiring metric, the D-score, to support the identification of the most rewired nodes in a dynamic network or, more specifically, the most dynamic neighborhoods, i.e. the induced sub-graph consisting of all nodes adjacent to a given node. Node rewiring can be defined both in terms of changes in the identity of interacting neighbors (e.g. protein A interacts with different proteins under different conditions) and/or in terms of changes in the edge weights for a node’s connections (e.g. quantitative changes in the affinity of protein A and its interacting partners over different conditions, detected, for example, using SILAC). A dynamic network may be modeled as a weighted node adjacency matrix that is then extended by a third dimension, S, to describe the state-space, i.e. . In this model, the dynamic rewiring score, D-score, of a node may be calculated based on the variance of its corresponding row, , over the various network states, S, relative to the mean (centroid, c), where the base dissimilarity measure (d) is the Euclidean distance (see Equation 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1 for further details, including a simple worked example). The D-score is defined as: where the vector x represents the neighborhood after standardization. The D-score favors high degree nodes or hubs (which often prove more interesting biologically) and a degree corrected version is also provided. High scoring rewired nodes are highlighted on the central reference network and on each state graph, via node color, and added as a new node attribute in Cytoscape’s table view. DyNet also offers additional ancillary features such as the Node Analyzer, which enables a chosen node neighborhood be viewed in isolation both in the central reference network and across all states. This is especially useful for untangling the dynamics of large, densely connected, many-state networks. DyNet also has an advanced filtering option and an alternative method to visualize dynamic edge behaviour in the form of an ‘edge-by-state’ heatmap and associated dendrogram that can be viewed in parallel with the main graph-based visualizations. DyNet is implemented as a cross-platform Cytoscape app (3.2 and above) (http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/dynet).
Fig. 1.

A DyNet visualization of the Hippo signalling pathway protein–protein interaction network in the presence and absence of okadaic (OA), an inhibitor of serine and threonine phosphatases (Couzens ). The network window on the left shows the central reference union network—red edges are present only upon stimulation (OA); green edges are present only in the unstimulated network (DMSO); grey edges are present in both. DyNet highlights nodes which are most rewired (more red  =  higher variation) via the D-score, see text. The Lats2 protein, for example, shows significant rewiring of its adjacent neighbours following OA treatment (yellow sub-network)

A DyNet visualization of the Hippo signalling pathway protein–protein interaction network in the presence and absence of okadaic (OA), an inhibitor of serine and threonine phosphatases (Couzens ). The network window on the left shows the central reference union network—red edges are present only upon stimulation (OA); green edges are present only in the unstimulated network (DMSO); grey edges are present in both. DyNet highlights nodes which are most rewired (more red  =  higher variation) via the D-score, see text. The Lats2 protein, for example, shows significant rewiring of its adjacent neighbours following OA treatment (yellow sub-network) To demonstrate DyNet’s performance we present two case studies. Couzens recently mapped the Hippo signalling pathway PPI network in the presence and absence of stimulation by okadaic acid (OA). DyNet was used to visualize and analyze these two states of the Hippo pathway network and to identify the most rewired nodes (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Information). DyNet highlighted Lats2 (large tumor suppressor kinase2) as one of the nodes that was notably rewired in the presence of OA. In the absence of OA, Lats2 had 32 interacting partners. The majority (24) were lost following stimulation with OA, while 6 new interactions were gained. The authors of the original study suggested this rewiring represented a shift from repressive interactions to those that promote LATS activity, such as MST1 and MST2. Interestingly, DyNet also identified SAV1 (scaffolding protein salvador homolog 1) as being notably rewired, which has also been shown to associate with MST1 and MST2 to activate the Hippo signaling pathway (Harvey ). To showcase DyNet’s ability to handle larger, multi-state networks we have also inferred a large-scale dynamic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) pathway PPI network across 47 different tissues (where each state network has 453 nodes and 588 edges on average), see Supplementary Information. DyNet took ∼10 s to import all 47 tissue-specific networks, via its multiple file import feature, and ∼20 s to build and lay out the central reference network, all state networks and to identify the most rewired nodes (16Gb RAM; Core i5). DyNet identified several known regulators of EGFR signaling (EGFR, RAF1, GRB2) as being the most rewired across tissues (Supplementary Information and Fig. S2). We have also tested DyNet with a simulated dataset containing 100 network states, with on average 1300 nodes and 2,200 edges per state, which represents the approximate upper analysis limit.

3 Conclusion

DyNet introduces several tools and metrics for visualizing and analyzing node and edge rewiring within large-scale, many-state, dynamic molecular interaction networks. We believe DyNet will be invaluable to researchers as they continue to generate large-scale contextual interaction data and delve into the rewiring of the cell’s dynamic interactome.

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) PRIMES project under grant agreement number FP7-HEALTH-2011-278568. The Lynn Group is also supported by EMBL Australia. Conflict of Interest: none declared.
  10 in total

1.  PPIXpress: construction of condition-specific protein interaction networks based on transcript expression.

Authors:  Thorsten Will; Volkhard Helms
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Toward the dynamic interactome: it's about time.

Authors:  Teresa M Przytycka; Mona Singh; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  KDDN: an open-source Cytoscape app for constructing differential dependency networks with significant rewiring.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Bai Zhang; Eric P Hoffman; Robert Clarke; Zhen Zhang; Ie-Ming Shih; Jianhua Xuan; David M Herrington; Yue Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Miriam Barrios-Rodiles; Kevin R Brown; Barish Ozdamar; Rohit Bose; Zhong Liu; Robert S Donovan; Fukiko Shinjo; Yongmei Liu; Joanna Dembowy; Ian W Taylor; Valbona Luga; Natasa Przulj; Mark Robinson; Harukazu Suzuki; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Igor Jurisica; Jeffrey L Wrana
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Protein interaction network of the mammalian Hippo pathway reveals mechanisms of kinase-phosphatase interactions.

Authors:  Amber L Couzens; James D R Knight; Michelle J Kean; Guoci Teo; Alexander Weiss; Wade H Dunham; Zhen-Yuan Lin; Richard D Bagshaw; Frank Sicheri; Tony Pawson; Jeffrey L Wrana; Hyungwon Choi; Anne-Claude Gingras
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 6.  Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease.

Authors:  Albert-László Barabási; Natali Gulbahce; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  How do oncoprotein mutations rewire protein-protein interaction networks?

Authors:  Emily H Bowler; Zhenghe Wang; Rob M Ewing
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 8.  The Hippo pathway and human cancer.

Authors:  Kieran F Harvey; Xiaomeng Zhang; David M Thomas
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Differential network biology.

Authors:  Trey Ideker; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  A map of directional genetic interactions in a metazoan cell.

Authors:  Bernd Fischer; Thomas Sandmann; Thomas Horn; Maximilian Billmann; Varun Chaudhary; Wolfgang Huber; Michael Boutros
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total
  48 in total

1.  Time-resolved transcriptome and proteome landscape of human regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation reveals novel regulators of FOXP3.

Authors:  Angelika Schmidt; Francesco Marabita; Narsis A Kiani; Catharina C Gross; Henrik J Johansson; Szabolcs Éliás; Sini Rautio; Matilda Eriksson; Sunjay Jude Fernandes; Gilad Silberberg; Ubaid Ullah; Urvashi Bhatia; Harri Lähdesmäki; Janne Lehtiö; David Gomez-Cabrero; Heinz Wiendl; Riitta Lahesmaa; Jesper Tegnér
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 7.431

2.  A Structured Workflow for Mapping Human Sin3 Histone Deacetylase Complex Interactions Using Halo-MudPIT Affinity-Purification Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Charles A S Banks; Janet L Thornton; Cassandra G Eubanks; Mark K Adams; Sayem Miah; Gina Boanca; Xingyu Liu; Maria L Katt; Tari J Parmely; Laurence Florens; Michael P Washburn
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Protein network construction using reverse phase protein array data.

Authors:  Rency S Varghese; Yiming Zuo; Yi Zhao; Yong-Wei Zhang; Sandra A Jablonski; Mariaelena Pierobon; Emanuel F Petricoin; Habtom W Ressom; Louis M Weiner
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  The DifferentialNet database of differential protein-protein interactions in human tissues.

Authors:  Omer Basha; Rotem Shpringer; Chanan M Argov; Esti Yeger-Lotem
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evolution of miRNA-Binding Sites and Regulatory Networks in Cichlids.

Authors:  Tarang K Mehta; Luca Penso-Dolfin; Will Nash; Sushmita Roy; Federica Di-Palma; Wilfried Haerty
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 8.800

6.  DiNAR: revealing hidden patterns of plant signalling dynamics using Differential Network Analysis in R.

Authors:  Maja Zagorščak; Andrej Blejec; Živa Ramšak; Marko Petek; Tjaša Stare; Kristina Gruden
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.993

7.  Human Histone Interaction Networks: An Old Concept, New Trends.

Authors:  Yunhui Peng; Yaroslav Markov; Alexander Goncearenco; David Landsman; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Death Processes in Bovine Theca and Granulosa Cells Modelled and Analysed Using a Systems Biology Approach.

Authors:  Malgorzata J McEvoy; Emilia Sinderewicz; Leo Creedon; Marion McAfee; Agnieszka W Jonczyk; Katarzyna K Piotrowska-Tomala; Dariusz J Skarzynski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Introducing the novel Cytoscape app TimeNexus to analyze time-series data using temporal MultiLayer Networks (tMLNs).

Authors:  Michaël Pierrelée; Ana Reynders; Fabrice Lopez; Aziz Moqrich; Laurent Tichit; Bianca H Habermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  In silico comparative analysis of LRRK2 interactomes from brain, kidney and lung.

Authors:  Amrita Verma; Kirsten Ebanks; Chi-Yee Fok; Patrick A Lewis; Conceicao Bettencourt; Rina Bandopadhyay
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.