Literature DB >> 27153562

Polymorphisms in the CHIT1 gene: Associations with colorectal cancer.

Fei-Feng Li1,2, Peng Yan3, Zhi-Xun Zhao3, Zheng Liu4, Da-Wei Song3, Xing-Wang Zhao3, Xi-Shan Wang2,4, Gui-Yu Wang2,3, Shu-Lin Liu1,2,5.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common solid tumors worldwide, often associated with inflammation. The microbes in the human intestine have a key role in inflammations and CRC. Chitotriose renders growth advantage to some bacteria, especially some pathogens, and thus has a role in inflammations. The enzyme chitotriosidase, encoded by the CHIT1 gene of the host, may degrade chitotriose with different efficiencies depending on the alleles. We sequenced the CHIT1 gene for 320 Chinese Han CRC patients and 404 normal controls, and focused on variations rs61745299 and rs35920428 within the CHIT1 gene for their possible roles in CRC. Statistical analyses were conducted using Chi-Square Tests as implemented in SPSS (version 19.0). Multiple sequence alignment was conducted using the Vector NTI, and protein expression levels were analyzed by western blotting. The two variations, rs61745299 and rs35920428 within the CDS region of CHIT1 gene, were associated with the risk of CRC (both with P values < 0.001). Western blotting analysis showed that the variations increased the expression levels of the CHIT1 and C-reaction protein genes in the cancer tissue. We conclude that the two variations of CHIT1, rs61745299 and rs35920428, increase expression of the gene and are associated with CRC in Chinese Han populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reaction protein; CHIT1; colorectal cancer; gene expression; microbe

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27153562      PMCID: PMC5129954          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of solid tumors worldwide [1]. Annually, over 96,000 new cases of colon cancer and 40,000 new cases of rectal cancer occur in the USA [2]. Most CRC cases are sporadic, with 15–25% of the cases having a family history [3] and 5% diagnosed cases having inherited CRC syndrome [4]. Several genes have been identified for their involvement in CRC [5]; however the precise etiologic factors of CRC are essentially unclear. In addition to genetic predisposition, contribution of the intestinal microbiota to the development of CRC is gaining attention. Some intestinal bacteria may induce inflammation and damage immune cells in the intestinal lamina propria [6]. When the composition of the normal microbial community is disturbed or shifted, microbial dysbiosis may occur, facilitating inflammatory processes [7] and increasing the risk of CRC [8]. The intestinal barrier dysfunction during inflammation may result in adenoma invasion by microbial products, which may induce inflammatory cytokines and facilitate tumor growth [9]. In the inflammation processes, interactions between the intestinal microbiota and the immune system increase the risk of CRC [9, 10]. Microbial dysbiosis also promotes inflammation and tumorigenesis, and intestinal inflammation in turn modifies intestinal microbial community and promotes tumor growth [10]. However, it is unclear whether the inflammatory process or CRC is caused by dysbiosis, or dysbiosis occurs as a consequence of inflammation. Bacterial cell wall contains chitotriose, which may render many pathogenic bacteria selective growth advantages in highly competitive ecological niches [11, 12]. Chitotriose can protect bacteria from bactericidal actions [13, 14]. The enzyme chitotriosidase that degrades chitotriose is encoded by the CHIT1 gene (chitinase 1, Gene ID: 1118) located on chromosome 1q32.1. Chitotriosidase is produced by human mature monocyte-derived macrophages and other tissue macrophages at the late stage of differentiation [15, 16]. It is a highly conserved enzyme, which promotes innate immunity and degrades chitotriose-containing pathogens [17, 18]. In order to elucidate the possible associations of CHIT1 gene and the pathogenicity of CRC, we analyzed the transcribed regions and splicing sites of the gene and compared the gene sequences between 320 Chinese Han CRC patients and 404 normal controls. We found that two variations rs61745299 and rs35920428 within the CDS region of CHIT1 gene were associated with the risk of CRC in the Chinese Han Population, and the variations increased expression levels of the CHIT1 and C-reaction protein genes in the cancer tissue.

RESULTS

Clinical data

The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by three specialists in colorectal cancer in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. There was no history of other systemic abnormalities in these CRC patients and no previous tumor or familial history. All the CRC patients (n = 320, male 196, female 124, the min and max age were 16 and 87 respectively, and the average age was 59.27 years) and unrelated controls (n = 404, male 251, female 153, the min and max age were 50 and 70 respectively, and the average age was 58.69 years) were recruited for this study, and there were no statistical differences in the gender composition or age between the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of study population

ParameterCRCControlFtP95% CI
UpLow
Sample (n)320404-----
Male/Female (n)196/124251/153--0.809--
Age (years)59.27 ± 12.4658.69 ± 4.15198.866−0.7920.429−2.047390.87167

Data are shown as mean ± SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the age and gender composition.

Data are shown as mean ± SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the age and gender composition.

CHIT1 gene analyses

We sequenced the CHIT1 gene to test the hypothesis that germline common genetic variants in CHIT1 may confer the susceptibility to CRC. We compared the transcribed regions and splicing sites of CHIT1 and found the variants rs61745299 and rs35920428 within translated region (Figure 1A) and conserved domain family (Figure 1B). The conserved domain family included a large number of catalytically inactive chitinase-like lectins (chitolectins) such as YKL-39, YKL-40 (HCGP39), YM1, oviductin, and AMCase (acidic mammalian chitinase), as well as catalytically active chitotriosidases (CDD:119351). The genetic heterozygosity of the two variations was very high (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Schematic diagrams of the variations

(A) Schematic diagrams of rs61745299 and rs35920428 locations in the CHIT1 gene CDS region; (B) Schematic diagrams of p.Arg50His (rs61745299) and p.Thr246Ser (rs35920428) locations in the CHIT1 protein region 1 and region 2.

Figure 2

Three genotypes of DNA sequence chromatogram of rs61745299 and rs35920428 in CHIT1 gene

Schematic diagrams of the variations

(A) Schematic diagrams of rs61745299 and rs35920428 locations in the CHIT1 gene CDS region; (B) Schematic diagrams of p.Arg50His (rs61745299) and p.Thr246Ser (rs35920428) locations in the CHIT1 protein region 1 and region 2.

Statistics analyses of polymorphism-disease association

To test any possible associations between CHIT1 and CRC, we conducted SNP analyses and found that the variants rs61745299 and rs35920428 in the CHIT1 gene were associated with the risk of CRC in the Chinese Han population (Tables 2, 3). At the same time, we also conducted the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test for the CRC and controls and it was in line with equilibrium.
Table 2

The genotype and allele frequency of rs61745299 and rs35920428 variations in 320 Chinese han sporadic colorectal cancer patients and 404 non-CRC controls

VariationsGroupGenotype frequency (%)Allele frequency (%)
rs61745299GenotypeC/CC/GG/GCG
CRC320253 (79.1)66 (20.6)1 (0.3)572 (89.4)68 (10.6)
Controls404361 (89.4)43 (10.6)0 (0)765 (94.7)43 (5.3)
rs35920428GenotypeG/GG/AA/AGA
CRC320254 (79.4)65 (20.3)1 (0.3)573 (89.5)67 (10.5)
Controls404361 (89.4)42 (10.4)1 (0.2)764 (94.6)44 (5.4)

SAP: sporadic adenomatous polyposis.

Table 3

rs61745299 and rs35920428 variations within CHIT1 gene associated with risk of sporadic colorectal cancer in chinese populations

VariationsTypePearson Chi-squarePearson's R
ValueMin countadfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)ValueAsymp. Std. errorbApprox. TcApprox. Sig
rs61745299Genotype15.310a0.4420.000−0.1450.037−3.9290.000d
Allele14.190a49.0610.000−0.0990.026−3.7830.000d
rs35920428Genotype14.003a0.8820.001−0.1360.037−3.6780.000d
Allele12.731a49.0610.000−0.0940.026−3.5810.000d

The minimum expected count;

Not assuming the null hypothesis;

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis;

Based on normal approximation.

SAP: sporadic adenomatous polyposis. The minimum expected count; Not assuming the null hypothesis; Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis; Based on normal approximation.

Conservation of the protein in evolution

We compared the CHIT1 protein sequences from different species including birds, fishes, rodents and primates. Multiple-sequence alignment analysis showed that the conservation of all the CHIT1 protein sequences were very low and conservation of the 50 Arg and 246 Thr residues (SNPs position) were also very low (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Conservation analysis of the CHIT1 protein sequences

(A) multiple-sequence alignment of p.Arg50His (rs61745299); (B) multiple-sequence alignment of p.Thr246Ser (rs35920428). The conservation of the two residues was not high.

Conservation analysis of the CHIT1 protein sequences

(A) multiple-sequence alignment of p.Arg50His (rs61745299); (B) multiple-sequence alignment of p.Thr246Ser (rs35920428). The conservation of the two residues was not high.

Expression levels of the wild and variant types of the CHIT1 gene

We used the western blotting analysis to measure the expression levels of CHIT1, C reaction protein, C-myc and β-catenin genes in cancer and normal tissues in the wild and variant types of the gene. The expression levels of CHIT1 were higher in cancer than in normal tissues in both heterozygous and homozygous variation type groups (Figure 4A, Figure 4B) but not in the wild type CHIT1 group (Figure 4C, 4D). Like the CHIT1 gene, the expression levels of C reaction protein gene also exhibited statistically significant differences between the cancer and normal tissues in the CHIT1 gene mutant type groups (Figure 5 and Figure 6A). For the β-catenin gene, no statistical differences of expression levels were seen between the cancer and normal tissue in all the CHIT1 gene mutant and wild type groups (Figure 5 and Figure 6B); the expression level of C-myc in all the CHIT1 gene mutant and wild type groups had statistical differences between the cancer and normal tissues (Figure 5 and Figure 6C).
Figure 4

The expression levels of CHIT1 in CRC patients

(A) The expression levels of CHIT1 in cancer tissues in the variations heterozygous and homozygous mutation type groups were higher than normal tissues. (B) There has a statistical difference between the cancer and normal tissue in the heterozygous and homozygous mutation type groups. (C) The expression levels of CHIT1 in cancer tissues in the variations wild type group. (D) There has no difference of the expression level between the cancer and normal tissue in the variations wild type groups. The protein expression levels were normalized to GADPH.

Figure 5

The expression levels of C reaction protein, β-catenin, C-myc genes of CRC patients

The expression levels of the C reaction protein gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in the mutant type groups, however the wild type group was not. The expression levels of the β-catenin gene in the cancer tissues were higher than normal tissue in the mutant and wild type groups, however it was not obvious. The expression levels of the C-myc gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in the mutant and wild type groups.

Figure 6

The statistics analyses of the β-catenin, C-myc and C reaction protein protein expression levels in the CRC patients

(A) the expression level of the C reaction protein gene has statistical differences between the cancer and normal tissue in the mutant type groups, however there has no difference in the wild type group. The protein expression levels were normalized to GADPH. (B) There have no statistical differences of the β-catenin gene expression levels between cancer and normal tissues in all the mutant and wild type groups. (C) the expression levels of the C-myc gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in all the mutant and wild type groups.

The expression levels of CHIT1 in CRC patients

(A) The expression levels of CHIT1 in cancer tissues in the variations heterozygous and homozygous mutation type groups were higher than normal tissues. (B) There has a statistical difference between the cancer and normal tissue in the heterozygous and homozygous mutation type groups. (C) The expression levels of CHIT1 in cancer tissues in the variations wild type group. (D) There has no difference of the expression level between the cancer and normal tissue in the variations wild type groups. The protein expression levels were normalized to GADPH.

The expression levels of C reaction protein, β-catenin, C-myc genes of CRC patients

The expression levels of the C reaction protein gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in the mutant type groups, however the wild type group was not. The expression levels of the β-catenin gene in the cancer tissues were higher than normal tissue in the mutant and wild type groups, however it was not obvious. The expression levels of the C-myc gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in the mutant and wild type groups.

The statistics analyses of the β-catenin, C-myc and C reaction protein protein expression levels in the CRC patients

(A) the expression level of the C reaction protein gene has statistical differences between the cancer and normal tissue in the mutant type groups, however there has no difference in the wild type group. The protein expression levels were normalized to GADPH. (B) There have no statistical differences of the β-catenin gene expression levels between cancer and normal tissues in all the mutant and wild type groups. (C) the expression levels of the C-myc gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in all the mutant and wild type groups.

Comparative analysis of clinical features

We also compared the clinical characteristics between wild type and variant CHIT1 gene groups of the CRC subjects in detail. We found statistically significant differences between the two groups in several clinical features, such as hemoglobin, albumin, CEA, CA199, but not in others, such as gender composition, age, white blood cells, neutrophilic granulocyte percentage, creatinine, TNM Stage and histopathological types (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparative analysis of clinical features between mutant and wild type groups

Clinical IndexWild TypeMutant TypeChi-Square Test
Gender (male/female)148/9948/25P = 0.369
Age (year)59.42 ± 12.6558.89 ± 11.96P = 0.554
White Blood Cells6.79 ± 2.536.56 ± 2.10P = 0.798
Neutrophilic Granulocyte Percentage61.27 ± 11.3158.89 ± 9.51P = 0.059
Hemoglobin128.68 ± 22.67125.78 ± 28.06P = 0.013
Albumin40.40 ± 5.1547.15 ± 46.02P = 0.007
Creatinine75.06 ± 16.8278.96 ± 22.54P = 0.100
TNM Stage (I/II/III/IV)37/103/88/2013/37/20/2P = 0.184
Histopathological types (TA/PA/MA/SC/AC/MC/CH/UC)51/11/6/2/0/1/0/1163/44/19/7/1/4/1/9P = 0.963
CEA13.36 ± 44.4029.72 ± 126.55P = 0.002
CA19959.71 ± 201.1026.64 ± 67.68P = 0.024
Tumor sites (left/right)128/3626/23P = 0.001
Tumor types (rectum/colon)134/10832/39P = 0.126

TA: Tubular adenocarcinoma; PA: Papillary adenocarcinoma; MA: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; SC: Signet-ring cell carcinoma; AC: Adenosquamous carcinoma; MC: Medullary caricinoma; CH: Choriocarinoma; UC: Undifferentiated caricinoma.

TA: Tubular adenocarcinoma; PA: Papillary adenocarcinoma; MA: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; SC: Signet-ring cell carcinoma; AC: Adenosquamous carcinoma; MC: Medullary caricinoma; CH: Choriocarinoma; UC: Undifferentiated caricinoma.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the associations between CHIT1 gene variants (rs61745299 and rs35920428) and the risk of colorectal cancer in the Chinese Han population. We found that two variations within the CDS region of CHIT1 gene were associated with the risk of CRC. The expression levels of CHIT1 and C-reaction protein genes were also associated with the variations. Tens of trillions of microbes in the human distal intestine form the gut microbiota [19], which has different compositions among different human populations, associated with multiple factors such as long-term dietary habits of the subjects [20, 21]. The microbiota colonizing the mammalian gut can protect the host against pathologies [22]. Microbes and their metabolites not only facilitate human immune development [23] but also help prevent invasion by pathogens [24], playing very important roles for the human heath. Some microbes in the microbiota may trigger intestinal inflammation [25]. Normally, the activated inflammatory cells along with other host responses will eliminate or kill the invading organisms [26]. However, in some cases the inflammatory responses may transform into chronic inflammations [27] or facilitate carcinogenesis [26, 28, 29]. Several inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, have been reported in the colorectal cancers process [30]. In this work, we characterized two variations rs61745299 and rs35920428 within the CHIT1 gene that were associated with elevated expression levels of the C-reaction protein in the cancer tissue. This finding further proved the importance of the C-reactive protein in the pathogenesis of the disease. In addition to inflammation, the infectious agents are also involved in cancer development, especially in organs exposed to microorganisms, such as the colon and rectum [19, 31]. Chitotriose as a component of the bacterial cell wall renders the bacteria, especially some pathogenic bacteria, selective growth advantages [11, 12] and may enable them to promote inflammation processes [32]. The chitotriosidase encoded by the CHIT1 gene is a highly conserved enzyme [33, 34] and promotes degradation of chitotriose and chitin-containing pathogens [33, 34]. In this work, we found the two variations associated with differential expression of CHIT1 and risk of CRC, providing further evidence for the importance of the chitotriosidase in the pathogenesis of CRC. Chitinase 3-like-1 (CHI3L1), another chitinase secreted by the colonic epithelial cells, contributes to the proliferation, migration, and neoplastic progression of colonic epithelial cells in the inflammatory conditions [35]. It is also a molecule associated with inflammation, and its expression is increased in colitis and colon cancer patients [36]. Therefore, it is interesting that we found the variations in the CHIT1 gene associated with the increased expression of the CHIT1 and C-reaction protein genes in the cancer tissue, further emphasizing the importance of chitotriosidase, chitotriose and microbiota in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is highly conserved in evolution and found in all metazoan animals [37], and it regulates many life activities and processes [38-40]. Many cases of dysregulation in the pathway have been shown to promote colon tumorigenesis [41]. In the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, the unbound β-catenin in cytoplasm may activate the Wnt cascade [5, 42]. Silencing of the β-catenin leads to decreased colonosphere formation [43] and hyper-activation of C-myc leads to increased potential formation of colonospheres [44]. However, in this work we did not find any differences of the expression levels of the β-catenin and C-myc genes between the CHIT1 gene variant and wild type groups. In conclusion, we found in this study that two variations rs61745299 and rs35920428 in the CHIT1 gene were associated with the risk of CRC and expression levels of the CHIT1 and C-reaction protein genes in the cancer tissue, providing further evidence for the key roles of chitotriose, chitotriosidase and C-reaction protein in the intestinal inflammation and CRC pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

In total, 320 sporadic adenomatous polyposis cases and 404 normal controls were collected for verification in this study (Table 1). All the subjects were assembled at the Department of Colorectal Surgery and Medical Examination Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China, and they all had physical and enteroscopic examinations. All patients had colorectal cancers and none of the normal controls showed enteric or other abnormality or defects. The medical history and physical characters of all the subjects were recorded in detail. We obtained a written informed consent from each participant or their guardian, and this work has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University [5], consistent with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

DNA analysis

Using standard protocols, we extracted the genomic DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes of the participants, and amplified the ten exons and splicing sites of the gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers shown in Table 5, and the PCR products were sequenced for mutational analysis [45].
Table 5

PCR primers used for CHIT1 gene sequence analysis

ExonForward primerReverse primerSize (bp)Tm (°C)
1CTTCCCGCTTTCCTCTGTTGGTAGCAAGTGGTCCCT37055.0
2GCCTGGGAAGGTGAGAATAGGGCTGGTAGCAGATGG24854.2
3TGCCATTTCTGCCTGTCGTGGGAGGAGGTTATCTGTC41154.6
4GATGGTCCCCTTTCCTCAGCCCAGGTAGATGTTCACTT53656.4
5CATCTACCTGGGCTCACACTGGAACAGGGCAGCAGT42353.8
6GTCTGGGTCACCTTCTGCCCATCAGCCAAGATGCTC50155.0
7GGGCTGGAATCCTAACAACAGAAACGGTGGGAGAAG41155.3
8CATGCCATCTTGAATTTATCAAGGAGACTCACCCTTGA42152.7
9TCTCCAGAATCTACAGCCACTCGCAGGCATTGCTACAACC48155.1
10TGTGAGGCCAGGTGTTGCAGCCCAGGAGACCCAGAA63357.2

Rs61745299 and rs35920428 CHIT1 SNP genotyping analysis and statistical analysis

Gene variations were determined for 320 sporadic adenomatous polyposis cases and 404 normal controls to determine the genotypes (Table 5). The statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS software (version 19.0), with those of the continuous variables (measurement data, such as age and protein expression level) by independent-samples T test and those for the discrete variables (enumeration data, such as gender composition and genotype frequency) by Chi-Square Tests to calculate odds ratios and P value [46]. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test of the CRC and control population was conducted with the online software OEGE.

Multiple sequence alignment

From the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), we obtained the CHIT1 protein sequences of various species and carried out multiple-sequence alignments of the proteins using the Vector NTI software.

Western blotting analysis

Proteins of the tumor tissue and normal tissue near the tumor were extracted using standard protocols and protein contents were determined using the BCA protein assay kit (from BOSTER) and ELISA. Then the proteins were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. The membranes then were incubated with the primary antibodies against CHIT1 (Abcam), C reaction protein (Abcam), C-myc (Abcam) and β-catenin (Abcam) and GAPDH (Abcam) in 5% non-fat milk in TBST at room temperature for two hours. After three washes, ten min each with TBST, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (ZSGB-BIO) at room temperature for two hours. Then the membranes were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence plus reagent and imaged using the Bio-Rad gel imaging system. The band value was read using the image J software.
  46 in total

Review 1.  Toll-like receptors and innate immunity.

Authors:  R Medzhitov
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 2.  Limiting inflammatory responses during activation of innate immunity.

Authors:  Jiahuai Han; Richard J Ulevitch
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Partially acetylated chitooligosaccharides bind to YKL-40 and stimulate growth of human osteoarthritic chondrocytes.

Authors:  Jon M Einarsson; Sven Bahrke; Bjarni Thor Sigurdsson; Chuen-How Ng; Petur Henry Petersen; Olafur E Sigurjonsson; Halldor Jonsson; Johannes Gislason; Finnbogi R Thormodsson; Martin G Peter
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Characterization of human phagocyte-derived chitotriosidase, a component of innate immunity.

Authors:  Marco van Eijk; Cindy P A A van Roomen; G Herma Renkema; Anton P Bussink; Laura Andrews; Edward F C Blommaart; Alan Sugar; Arthur J Verhoeven; Rolf G Boot; Johannes M F G Aerts
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 4.823

5.  Chitinase 3-like-1 expression in colonic epithelial cells as a potentially novel marker for colitis-associated neoplasia.

Authors:  Chun-Chuan Chen; Joel Pekow; Victoria Llado; Manasa Kanneganti; Cindy W Lau; Atsushi Mizoguchi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Marc Bissonnette; Emiko Mizoguchi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Jeroen Raes; Eric Pelletier; Denis Le Paslier; Takuji Yamada; Daniel R Mende; Gabriel R Fernandes; Julien Tap; Thomas Bruls; Jean-Michel Batto; Marcelo Bertalan; Natalia Borruel; Francesc Casellas; Leyden Fernandez; Laurent Gautier; Torben Hansen; Masahira Hattori; Tetsuya Hayashi; Michiel Kleerebezem; Ken Kurokawa; Marion Leclerc; Florence Levenez; Chaysavanh Manichanh; H Bjørn Nielsen; Trine Nielsen; Nicolas Pons; Julie Poulain; Junjie Qin; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; Sebastian Tims; David Torrents; Edgardo Ugarte; Erwin G Zoetendal; Jun Wang; Francisco Guarner; Oluf Pedersen; Willem M de Vos; Søren Brunak; Joel Doré; María Antolín; François Artiguenave; Hervé M Blottiere; Mathieu Almeida; Christian Brechot; Carlos Cara; Christian Chervaux; Antonella Cultrone; Christine Delorme; Gérard Denariaz; Rozenn Dervyn; Konrad U Foerstner; Carsten Friss; Maarten van de Guchte; Eric Guedon; Florence Haimet; Wolfgang Huber; Johan van Hylckama-Vlieg; Alexandre Jamet; Catherine Juste; Ghalia Kaci; Jan Knol; Omar Lakhdari; Severine Layec; Karine Le Roux; Emmanuelle Maguin; Alexandre Mérieux; Raquel Melo Minardi; Christine M'rini; Jean Muller; Raish Oozeer; Julian Parkhill; Pierre Renault; Maria Rescigno; Nicolas Sanchez; Shinichi Sunagawa; Antonio Torrejon; Keith Turner; Gaetana Vandemeulebrouck; Encarna Varela; Yohanan Winogradsky; Georg Zeller; Jean Weissenbach; S Dusko Ehrlich; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota.

Authors:  Janelle C Arthur; Ernesto Perez-Chanona; Marcus Mühlbauer; Sarah Tomkovich; Joshua M Uronis; Ting-Jia Fan; Barry J Campbell; Turki Abujamel; Belgin Dogan; Arlin B Rogers; Jonathan M Rhodes; Alain Stintzi; Kenneth W Simpson; Jonathan J Hansen; Temitope O Keku; Anthony A Fodor; Christian Jobin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Proximal events in Wnt signal transduction.

Authors:  Stephane Angers; Randall T Moon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  24 bp duplication of CHIT1 gene and determinants of human chitotriosidase activity among participants of EPISONO, a population-based cross-sectional study, São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Priscila Tamanaha; Vânia D'Almeida; Bruno F A Calegare; Luciana Yuki Tomita; Lia Rita A Bittencourt; Sergio Tufik
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.281

10.  Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes.

Authors:  Gary D Wu; Jun Chen; Christian Hoffmann; Kyle Bittinger; Ying-Yu Chen; Sue A Keilbaugh; Meenakshi Bewtra; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Rohini Sinha; Erin Gilroy; Kernika Gupta; Robert Baldassano; Lisa Nessel; Hongzhe Li; Frederic D Bushman; James D Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Integrative Analysis Revealed Stemness Features and a Novel Stemness-Related Classification in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Meng-Ling Ye; Si-Qi Li; Yi-Xin Yin; Ke-Zhi Li; Ji-Lin Li; Bang-Li Hu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Structural Genomic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Coronaviruses.

Authors:  Qiong Zhang; Huai-Lan Guo; Jing Wang; Yao Zhang; Ping-Ji Deng; Fei-Feng Li
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Rs2459976 in ZW10 gene associated with congenital heart diseases in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Chao-Yu Sun; Chi Sun; Rui Cheng; Shuai Shi; Ying Han; Xue-Qi Li; Ji-Xin Zhi; Fei-Feng Li; Shu-Lin Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-13

4.  Establishment and Characterization of Paired Primary and Peritoneal Seeding Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines: Identification of Genes That Mediate Metastatic Potential.

Authors:  Soon-Chan Kim; Chang-Won Hong; Sang-Geun Jang; Ye-Ah Kim; Byong-Chul Yoo; Young-Kyoung Shin; Seung-Yong Jeong; Ja-Lok Ku; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Downregulation of miR‑224‑5p in prostate cancer and its relevant molecular mechanism via TCGA, GEO database and in silico analyses.

Authors:  Bin-Liang Gan; Li-Jie Zhang; Li Gao; Fu-Chao Ma; Rong-Quan He; Gang Chen; Jie Ma; Jin-Cai Zhong; Xiao-Hua Hu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Identification of a 13-gene-based classifier as a potential biomarker to predict the effects of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zuhuan Gan; Qiyuan Zou; Yan Lin; Zihai Xu; Zhong Huang; Zhichao Chen; Yufeng Lv
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Prognostic Signatures Based on Ferroptosis- and Immune-Related Genes for Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Endocervical Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chaoqun Xing; Huiming Yin; Zhi-Yong Yao; Xiao-Liang Xing
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Different effection of p.1125Val>Ala and rs11954856 in APC on Wnt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Fei-Feng Li; Zhi-Xun Zhao; Peng Yan; Song Wang; Zheng Liu; Qiong Zhang; Xiao-Ning Zhang; Chang-Hao Sun; Xi-Shan Wang; Gui-Yu Wang; Shu-Lin Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.