| Literature DB >> 27153562 |
Fei-Feng Li1,2, Peng Yan3, Zhi-Xun Zhao3, Zheng Liu4, Da-Wei Song3, Xing-Wang Zhao3, Xi-Shan Wang2,4, Gui-Yu Wang2,3, Shu-Lin Liu1,2,5.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common solid tumors worldwide, often associated with inflammation. The microbes in the human intestine have a key role in inflammations and CRC. Chitotriose renders growth advantage to some bacteria, especially some pathogens, and thus has a role in inflammations. The enzyme chitotriosidase, encoded by the CHIT1 gene of the host, may degrade chitotriose with different efficiencies depending on the alleles. We sequenced the CHIT1 gene for 320 Chinese Han CRC patients and 404 normal controls, and focused on variations rs61745299 and rs35920428 within the CHIT1 gene for their possible roles in CRC. Statistical analyses were conducted using Chi-Square Tests as implemented in SPSS (version 19.0). Multiple sequence alignment was conducted using the Vector NTI, and protein expression levels were analyzed by western blotting. The two variations, rs61745299 and rs35920428 within the CDS region of CHIT1 gene, were associated with the risk of CRC (both with P values < 0.001). Western blotting analysis showed that the variations increased the expression levels of the CHIT1 and C-reaction protein genes in the cancer tissue. We conclude that the two variations of CHIT1, rs61745299 and rs35920428, increase expression of the gene and are associated with CRC in Chinese Han populations.Entities:
Keywords: C-reaction protein; CHIT1; colorectal cancer; gene expression; microbe
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27153562 PMCID: PMC5129954 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinical characteristics of study population
| Parameter | CRC | Control | F | t | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up | Low | ||||||
| 320 | 404 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 196/124 | 251/153 | - | - | 0.809 | - | - | |
| 59.27 ± 12.46 | 58.69 ± 4.15 | 198.866 | −0.792 | 0.429 | −2.04739 | 0.87167 | |
Data are shown as mean ± SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the age and gender composition.
Figure 1Schematic diagrams of the variations
(A) Schematic diagrams of rs61745299 and rs35920428 locations in the CHIT1 gene CDS region; (B) Schematic diagrams of p.Arg50His (rs61745299) and p.Thr246Ser (rs35920428) locations in the CHIT1 protein region 1 and region 2.
Figure 2Three genotypes of DNA sequence chromatogram of rs61745299 and rs35920428 in CHIT1 gene
The genotype and allele frequency of rs61745299 and rs35920428 variations in 320 Chinese han sporadic colorectal cancer patients and 404 non-CRC controls
| Variations | Group | Genotype frequency (%) | Allele frequency (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | C/C | C/G | G/G | C | G | ||
| CRC | 320 | 253 (79.1) | 66 (20.6) | 1 (0.3) | 572 (89.4) | 68 (10.6) | |
| Controls | 404 | 361 (89.4) | 43 (10.6) | 0 (0) | 765 (94.7) | 43 (5.3) | |
| Genotype | G/G | G/A | A/A | G | A | ||
| CRC | 320 | 254 (79.4) | 65 (20.3) | 1 (0.3) | 573 (89.5) | 67 (10.5) | |
| Controls | 404 | 361 (89.4) | 42 (10.4) | 1 (0.2) | 764 (94.6) | 44 (5.4) | |
SAP: sporadic adenomatous polyposis.
rs61745299 and rs35920428 variations within CHIT1 gene associated with risk of sporadic colorectal cancer in chinese populations
| Variations | Type | Pearson Chi-square | Pearson's R | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Min count | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | Value | Asymp. Std. error | Approx. T | Approx. Sig | ||
| Genotype | 15.310 | 0.44 | 2 | −0.145 | 0.037 | −3.929 | |||
| Allele | 14.190 | 49.06 | 1 | −0.099 | 0.026 | −3.783 | |||
| Genotype | 14.003 | 0.88 | 2 | −0.136 | 0.037 | −3.678 | |||
| Allele | 12.731 | 49.06 | 1 | −0.094 | 0.026 | −3.581 | |||
The minimum expected count;
Not assuming the null hypothesis;
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis;
Based on normal approximation.
Figure 3Conservation analysis of the CHIT1 protein sequences
(A) multiple-sequence alignment of p.Arg50His (rs61745299); (B) multiple-sequence alignment of p.Thr246Ser (rs35920428). The conservation of the two residues was not high.
Figure 4The expression levels of CHIT1 in CRC patients
(A) The expression levels of CHIT1 in cancer tissues in the variations heterozygous and homozygous mutation type groups were higher than normal tissues. (B) There has a statistical difference between the cancer and normal tissue in the heterozygous and homozygous mutation type groups. (C) The expression levels of CHIT1 in cancer tissues in the variations wild type group. (D) There has no difference of the expression level between the cancer and normal tissue in the variations wild type groups. The protein expression levels were normalized to GADPH.
Figure 5The expression levels of C reaction protein, β-catenin, C-myc genes of CRC patients
The expression levels of the C reaction protein gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in the mutant type groups, however the wild type group was not. The expression levels of the β-catenin gene in the cancer tissues were higher than normal tissue in the mutant and wild type groups, however it was not obvious. The expression levels of the C-myc gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in the mutant and wild type groups.
Figure 6The statistics analyses of the β-catenin, C-myc and C reaction protein protein expression levels in the CRC patients
(A) the expression level of the C reaction protein gene has statistical differences between the cancer and normal tissue in the mutant type groups, however there has no difference in the wild type group. The protein expression levels were normalized to GADPH. (B) There have no statistical differences of the β-catenin gene expression levels between cancer and normal tissues in all the mutant and wild type groups. (C) the expression levels of the C-myc gene in the cancer tissues were higher than the normal tissue in all the mutant and wild type groups.
Comparative analysis of clinical features between mutant and wild type groups
| Clinical Index | Wild Type | Mutant Type | Chi-Square Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| 148/99 | 48/25 | ||
| 59.42 ± 12.65 | 58.89 ± 11.96 | ||
| 6.79 ± 2.53 | 6.56 ± 2.10 | ||
| 61.27 ± 11.31 | 58.89 ± 9.51 | ||
| 128.68 ± 22.67 | 125.78 ± 28.06 | ||
| 40.40 ± 5.15 | 47.15 ± 46.02 | ||
| 75.06 ± 16.82 | 78.96 ± 22.54 | ||
| 37/103/88/20 | 13/37/20/2 | ||
| 51/11/6/2/0/1/0/1 | 163/44/19/7/1/4/1/9 | ||
| 13.36 ± 44.40 | 29.72 ± 126.55 | ||
| 59.71 ± 201.10 | 26.64 ± 67.68 | ||
| 128/36 | 26/23 | ||
| 134/108 | 32/39 |
TA: Tubular adenocarcinoma; PA: Papillary adenocarcinoma; MA: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; SC: Signet-ring cell carcinoma; AC: Adenosquamous carcinoma; MC: Medullary caricinoma; CH: Choriocarinoma; UC: Undifferentiated caricinoma.
PCR primers used for CHIT1 gene sequence analysis
| Exon | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Size (bp) | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CTTCCCGCTTTCCTCTGT | TGGTAGCAAGTGGTCCCT | 370 | 55.0 |
| 2 | GCCTGGGAAGGTGAGAAT | AGGGCTGGTAGCAGATGG | 248 | 54.2 |
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | GATGGTCCCCTTTCCTCA | GCCCAGGTAGATGTTCACTT | 536 | 56.4 |
| 5 | CATCTACCTGGGCTCACA | CTGGAACAGGGCAGCAGT | 423 | 53.8 |
| 6 | GTCTGGGTCACCTTCTGC | CCATCAGCCAAGATGCTC | 501 | 55.0 |
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | CATGCCATCTTGAATTTATC | AAGGAGACTCACCCTTGA | 421 | 52.7 |
| 9 | TCTCCAGAATCTACAGCCACTC | GCAGGCATTGCTACAACC | 481 | 55.1 |
| 10 | TGTGAGGCCAGGTGTTGC | AGCCCAGGAGACCCAGAA | 633 | 57.2 |