Literature DB >> 27153529

Dynamics of a low-density tiger population in Southeast Asia in the context of improved law enforcement.

Somphot Duangchantrasiri1, Mayuree Umponjan2, Saksit Simcharoen1, Anak Pattanavibool2,3, Soontorn Chaiwattana1, Sompoch Maneerat1, N Samba Kumar4,5, Devcharan Jathanna4, Arjun Srivathsa4, K Ullas Karanth4,6.   

Abstract

Recovering small populations of threatened species is an important global conservation strategy. Monitoring the anticipated recovery, however, often relies on uncertain abundance indices rather than on rigorous demographic estimates. To counter the severe threat from poaching of wild tigers (Panthera tigris), the Government of Thailand established an intensive patrolling system in 2005 to protect and recover its largest source population in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary. Concurrently, we assessed the dynamics of this tiger population over the next 8 years with rigorous photographic capture-recapture methods. From 2006 to 2012, we sampled across 624-1026 km(2) with 137-200 camera traps. Cameras deployed for 21,359 trap days yielded photographic records of 90 distinct individuals. We used closed model Bayesian spatial capture-recapture methods to estimate tiger abundances annually. Abundance estimates were integrated with likelihood-based open model analyses to estimate rates of annual and overall rates of survival, recruitment, and changes in abundance. Estimates of demographic parameters fluctuated widely: annual density ranged from 1.25 to 2.01 tigers/100 km(2) , abundance from 35 to 58 tigers, survival from 79.6% to 95.5%, and annual recruitment from 0 to 25 tigers. The number of distinct individuals photographed demonstrates the value of photographic capture-recapture methods for assessments of population dynamics in rare and elusive species that are identifiable from natural markings. Possibly because of poaching pressure, overall tiger densities at Huai Kha Khaeng were 82-90% lower than in ecologically comparable sites in India. However, intensified patrolling after 2006 appeared to reduce poaching and was correlated with marginal improvement in tiger survival and recruitment. Our results suggest that population recovery of low-density tiger populations may be slower than anticipated by current global strategies aimed at doubling the number of wild tigers in a decade.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abundance estimation; camera traps; carnivores; carnívoros; dinámicas poblacionales; estimación de la abundancia; exceso de caza; modelos espaciales de captura-recaptura; overhunting; patrolling; patrullaje; population dynamics; spatial capture-recapture models; trampas cámara

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27153529     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

1.  Tigers in the Terai: Strong evidence for meta-population dynamics contributing to tiger recovery and conservation in the Terai Arc Landscape.

Authors:  Kanchan Thapa; Eric Wikramanayake; Sabita Malla; Krishna Prasad Acharya; Babu Ram Lamichhane; Naresh Subedi; Chiranjivi Prasad Pokharel; Gokarna Jung Thapa; Maheshwar Dhakal; Ashish Bista; Jimmy Borah; Mudit Gupta; Kamlesh K Maurya; Ghana Shyam Gurung; Shant Raj Jnawali; Narendra Man Babu Pradhan; Shiv Raj Bhata; Saroj Koirala; Dipankar Ghose; Joseph Vattakaven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Nest-site selection, reproductive ecology and shifts within core-use areas of Black-necked Cranes at the northern limit of the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Lixun Zhang; Bei An; Meilin Shu; Xiaojun Yang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Sumatran tiger survival threatened by deforestation despite increasing densities in parks.

Authors:  Matthew Scott Luskin; Wido Rizki Albert; Mathias W Tobler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Impact of prey occupancy and other ecological and anthropogenic factors on tiger distribution in Thailand's western forest complex.

Authors:  Somphot Duangchantrasiri; Pornkamol Jornburom; Sitthichai Jinamoy; Anak Pattanavibool; James E Hines; Todd W Arnold; John Fieberg; James L D Smith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Weights of gaur (Bos gaurus) and banteng (Bos javanicus) killed by tigers in Thailand.

Authors:  Supawat Khaewphakdee; Achara Simcharoen; Somphot Duangchantrasiri; Vijak Chimchome; Saksit Simcharoen; James L D Smith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Multi-seasonal systematic camera-trapping reveals fluctuating densities and high turnover rates of Carpathian lynx on the western edge of its native range.

Authors:  Martin Duľa; Michal Bojda; Delphine B H Chabanne; Peter Drengubiak; Ľuboslav Hrdý; Jarmila Krojerová-Prokešová; Jakub Kubala; Jiří Labuda; Leona Marčáková; Teresa Oliveira; Peter Smolko; Martin Váňa; Miroslav Kutal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Lions in a coexistence landscape: Repurposing a traditional field technique to monitor an elusive carnivore.

Authors:  Guy Western; Nicholas B Elliot; Steiner L Sompeta; Femke Broekhuis; Shadrack Ngene; Arjun M Gopalaswamy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Leopard and spotted hyena densities in the Lake Mburo National Park, southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Aleksander Braczkowski; Ralph Schenk; Dinal Samarasinghe; Duan Biggs; Allie Richardson; Nicholas Swanson; Merlin Swanson; Arjun Dheer; Julien Fattebert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  How "science" can facilitate the politicization of charismatic megafauna counts.

Authors:  Arjun M Gopalaswamy; Nicholas B Elliot; Shadrack Ngene; Femke Broekhuis; Alexander Braczkowski; Peter Lindsey; Craig Packer; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 12.779

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.