Valentin Zumstein1, Fabrizio Vinzens1, Andreas Zettl2, Karl Heinimann3, Dieter Koeberle4, Markus von Flüe1, Martin Bolli1. 1. Department of Surgery, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland. 2. Department of Pathology, Viollier AG, Allschwil, Switzerland. 3. Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. 4. Departments of Internal Medicine and Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 cause autosomal dominantly inherited Lynch syndrome. Lynch syndrome patients and their families benefit from life-saving intensive cancer surveillance. Approximately one in 30 colorectal cancers arises in the setting of Lynch syndrome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the detection rate of Lynch syndrome at our institution after introduction of systematic immunohistochemical screening for MMR deficiency in colorectal cancers from 2011 to 2015. DESIGN: Following the recommendations by the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention working group all colorectal cancers were immunohistochemically stained for the presence of MMR proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6, independent of clinical criteria. In the case of loss of MLH1, the somatic BRAF mutation V600E was assessed with molecular testing and/or immunohistochemistry. Clinical follow-up of potential Lynch syndrome carriers (patients with tumours showing loss of MLH1 expression with absence of BRAFV600E, loss of PMS2, MSH2 or MSH6) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of all patients (n = 486), loss of MMR protein expression was found in 73 (15.0%) tumours. Twenty-eight (6.0%) were classified as potential Lynch syndrome carriers. Of the genetically tested potential Lynch syndrome carriers (10 out of 28 patients), 40% were first diagnosed with Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of systematic immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome showed that 6% of colorectal cancers were potentially Lynch-syndrome related. Tumour board protocols should systematically contain information on MMR status of all colorectal cancers and, in MMR deficient cases, include clear recommendations for genetic counselling for all potential Lynch syndrome patients.
BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 cause autosomal dominantly inherited Lynch syndrome. Lynch syndromepatients and their families benefit from life-saving intensive cancer surveillance. Approximately one in 30 colorectal cancers arises in the setting of Lynch syndrome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the detection rate of Lynch syndrome at our institution after introduction of systematic immunohistochemical screening for MMR deficiency in colorectal cancers from 2011 to 2015. DESIGN: Following the recommendations by the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention working group all colorectal cancers were immunohistochemically stained for the presence of MMR proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6, independent of clinical criteria. In the case of loss of MLH1, the somatic BRAF mutation V600E was assessed with molecular testing and/or immunohistochemistry. Clinical follow-up of potential Lynch syndrome carriers (patients with tumours showing loss of MLH1 expression with absence of BRAFV600E, loss of PMS2, MSH2 or MSH6) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of all patients (n = 486), loss of MMR protein expression was found in 73 (15.0%) tumours. Twenty-eight (6.0%) were classified as potential Lynch syndrome carriers. Of the genetically tested potential Lynch syndrome carriers (10 out of 28 patients), 40% were first diagnosed with Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of systematic immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome showed that 6% of colorectal cancers were potentially Lynch-syndrome related. Tumour board protocols should systematically contain information on MMR status of all colorectal cancers and, in MMR deficient cases, include clear recommendations for genetic counselling for all potential Lynch syndromepatients.
Authors: Elizabeth V Clarke; Kristin R Muessig; Jamilyn Zepp; Jessica E Hunter; Sapna Syngal; Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner; Susan K Peterson; Kellene M Bergen; Elizabeth Shuster; James V Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Tia L Kauffman; Marian J Gilmore; Jacob A Reiss; Alan F Rope; Jennifer E Cook; Katrina A B Goddard Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Alessia Tognetto; Maria Benedetta Michelazzo; Giovanna Elisa Calabró; Brigid Unim; Marco Di Marco; Walter Ricciardi; Roberta Pastorino; Stefania Boccia Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-09-12
Authors: Simon Wieser; Maria C Katapodi; Islam Salikhanov; Karl Heinimann; Pierre Chappuis; Nicole Buerki; Rossella Graffeo; Viola Heinzelmann; Manuela Rabaglio; Monica Taborelli Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 5.941