| Literature DB >> 27152509 |
Esther Shin Patchin1, Donald S Anderson, Rona M Silva, Dale L Uyeminami, Grace M Scott, Ting Guo, Laura S Van Winkle, Kent E Pinkerton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are present in personal, commercial, and industrial products, which are often aerosolized. Current understanding of the deposition, translocation, and health-related impacts of AgNP inhalation is limited.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27152509 PMCID: PMC5132640 DOI: 10.1289/EHP234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1Microglial morphology of rat olfactory bulb stained with anti-Iba1 antibody. Left, resting/ramified (R) microglia exhibiting thin, highly branched protrusions extending from the cell body; right, activated microglia (A) exhibiting amoeboid morphology with shorter, stouter processes. Left, rat treated with 110-nm silver nanoparticles 21 days post-exposure; right, rat treated with 20-nm silver nanoparticles 21 days post-exposure. Bar = 20 μm.
Characterization of 20- and 110-nm silver nanoparticles (C20 and C110, respectively) in suspension and following aerosolization (adapted from Anderson et al. 2015).
| Parameter | Method | C20 | C110 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrodynamic diameter before exposure (nm) | Dynamic light scattering (DLS) | 27.06 ± 0.15 | 111.2 ± 0.2 |
| Hydrodynamic diameter after exposure (nm) | Dynamic light scattering | 27.24 ± 0.21 | 106.6 ± 0.2 |
| Geometric mean size [nm (standard deviation)] | Size mobility particle scanning | 77.4 (1.8) | 78.2 (1.8) |
| Total particle mass concentration (mg/m3) | Gravimetric analysis | 13.9 ± 2.3 | 12.4 ± 2.5 |
| Airborne silver ion concentration (mg/m3) | X-ray fluorescence | 7.2 ± 0.8 | 5.3 ± 1.0 |
| Airborne particle number based on airborne concentration of silver (number/m3) | Calculated | 1.63 × 1014 | 7.24 × 1011 |
Figure 2Comparison of silver concentration in the nose (A) and olfactory bulb (B) between citrate (control) and 20- and 110-nm silver nanoparticles (AgNP) at different post-exposure days. *Significantly different from citrate control (p < 0.05). #Significantly different from the mean value at T0 in animals that had the same exposure (p < 0.05). Values are the mean ± SE. The level of detection is 0.011 μg Ag/g tissue. The mean value was obtained from 5 animals per particle type and time point.
Figure 3Comparison of percent difference from control of activated microglia in the olfactory bulb between 20- and 110-nm silver nanoparticles at different post-exposure days. *Significantly different from citrate control (p < 0.05). #Significantly different from the mean value at post-exposure day 56 (T56) in animals that had the same exposure (p < 0.05). Values are the mean ± SE. The mean value was obtained from 3 animals per particle type and time point except for the group treated with 110-nm silver nanoparticles at T56, where the mean value was obtained from 2 animals.
Figure 4Comparison of microglial number/10 fields in the olfactory bulb between controls and rats exposed to silver nanoparticles at different post-exposure days. Values are the mean ± SE. The mean value was obtained from 3 animals per particle type and time point except for the group treated with 110-nm silver nanoparticles at post-exposure day 56, where the mean value was obtained from 2 animals.