Literature DB >> 27152441

A Global Social Media Survey of Attitudes to Human Genome Editing.

Tristan McCaughey1, Paul G Sanfilippo2, George E C Gooden3, David M Budden4, Li Fan5, Eva Fenwick2, Gwyneth Rees2, Casimir MacGregor6, Lei Si7, Christine Chen1, Helena Hai Liang2, Timothy Baldwin8, Alice Pébay9, Alex W Hewitt10.   

Abstract

Ongoing breakthroughs with CRISPR/Cas-based editing could potentially revolutionize modern medicine, but there are many questions to resolve about the ethical implications for its therapeutic application. We conducted a worldwide online survey of over 12,000 people recruited via social media to gauge attitudes toward this technology and discuss our findings here.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27152441     DOI： 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stem Cell        ISSN： 1875-9777            Impact factor:   24.633


  28 in total

1.  Structurating Expanded Genetic Carrier Screening: A Longitudinal Analysis of Online News Coverage.

Authors:  Heather E Canary; Yvonne K Clark; Avery Holton
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-05-25

2.  Attitudes of clinical geneticists and certified genetic counselors to genome editing and its clinical applications: A nation-wide questionnaire survey in Japan.

Authors:  Iku Taguchi; Takahiro Yamada; Rina Akaishi; Issei Imoto; Kenji Kurosawa; Kaname Nakatani; Fumio Nomura; Haruka Hamanoue; Maki Hyodo; Hiromi Murakami; Hiroshi Yoshihashi; Junko Yotsumoto; Shinji Kosugi
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Fostering a prevention mindset for responsible gene editing.

Authors:  Karen M Meagher; Zubin Master
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Attitudes of Members of Genetics Professional Societies Toward Human Gene Editing.

Authors:  Alyssa J Armsby; Yvonne Bombard; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-10

Review 5.  Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement.

Authors:  Marsha Greene; Zubin Master
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Reasons for being in favour of or against genome modification: a survey of the Dutch general public.

Authors:  S Hendriks; N A A Giesbertz; A L Bredenoord; S Repping
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 7.  Principles of and strategies for germline gene therapy.

Authors:  Don P Wolf; Paul A Mitalipov; Shoukhrat M Mitalipov
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries.

Authors:  Ido Alon; Rosa Urbanos-Garrido; José Guimón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Attitudes of Indonesian Medical Doctors and Medical Students Toward Genome Editing.

Authors:  Safira Nur Izzah; Dimas Setyanto; Nurina Hasanatuludhhiyah; Danti Nur Indiastuti; Zamal Nasution; Annette d'Arqom
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Students' attitudes towards somatic genome editing versus genome editing of the germline using an example of familial leukemia.

Authors:  Beate Vajen; Joelle Ronez; Wiebke Rathje; Laura Heinisch; Smilla Ebeling; Ulrich Gebhard; Corinna Hößle; Brigitte Schlegelberger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.