| Literature DB >> 27152353 |
Trevor P Almeida1, Adrian R Muxworthy1, András Kovács2, Wyn Williams3, Paul D Brown4, Rafal E Dunin-Borkowski2.
Abstract
The study of the paleomagnetic signal recorded by rocks allows scientists to understand Earth's past magnetic field and the formation of the geodynamo. The magnetic recording fidelity of this signal is dependent on the magnetic domain state it adopts. The most prevalent example found in nature is the pseudo-single-domain (PSD) structure, yet its recording fidelity is poorly understood. Here, the thermoremanent behavior of PSD magnetite (Fe3O4) particles, which dominate the magnetic signatures of many rock lithologies, is investigated using electron holography. This study provides spatially resolved magnetic information from individual Fe3O4 grains as a function of temperature, which has been previously inaccessible. A small exemplar Fe3O4 grain (~150 nm) exhibits dynamic movement of its magnetic vortex structure above 400°C, recovering its original state upon cooling, whereas a larger exemplar Fe3O4 grain (~250 nm) is shown to retain its vortex state on heating to 550°C, close to the Curie temperature of 580°C. Hence, we demonstrate that Fe3O4 grains containing vortex structures are indeed reliable recorders of paleodirectional and paleointensity information, and the presence of PSD magnetic signals does not preclude the successful recovery of paleomagnetic signals.Entities:
Keywords: Palaeomagnetism; in situ transmission electron microscopy; magnetite; nanoparticles; off-axis electron holography; pseudo–single-domain states; thermo-remanent magnetisation; thermomagnetic behavior
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27152353 PMCID: PMC4846437 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Visualization of the thermomagnetic behavior of a small PSD Fe3O4 grain (sample G1).
(A) Bright-field TEM image of the individual Fe3O4 grain (~150 nm in length across its long-diagonal axis), with associated electron diffraction pattern inset. (B to H) Magnetic induction maps reconstructed from holograms taken at (B) 20°C (with the red arrow, labeled FD, showing the direction of the in-plane component of the applied saturating field to induce magnetic remanence, whereas the blue arrow shows the additional direction the field was applied for the calculation of the mean inner potential); during in situ heating to (C) 400°C, (D) 500°C, and (E) 550°C; upon subsequent cooling to (F) 500°C, (G) 400°C, and (H) 20°C. The contour spacing is 0.098 rad for all the magnetic induction maps, and the magnetization direction is shown using arrows, as depicted in the color wheel. v, center of the vortex.
Fig. 2Visualization of the thermomagnetic behavior of a slightly larger PSD Fe3O4 grain (sample G2).
(A) Bright-field TEM image of an individual Fe3O4 grain (~250 nm in length across its long-diagonal axis), with associated electron diffraction pattern inset. (B to H) Magnetic induction maps reconstructed from holograms taken at (B) 20°C (with the red arrow, labeled FD, showing the direction of the in-plane component of the applied saturating field to induce magnetic remanence, whereas the blue arrow shows the additional direction the field was applied for the calculation of the mean inner potential); during in situ heating to (C) 400°C, (D) 500°C, and (E) 550°C; upon subsequent cooling to (F) 500°C, (G) 400°C, and (H) 20°C. The contour spacing is 0.53 rad for all the magnetic induction maps, and the magnetization direction is shown using arrows, as depicted in the color wheel.