| Literature DB >> 27151266 |
David Oscier1, Monica Else2, Estella Matutes2, Ricardo Morilla2, Jonathan C Strefford3, Daniel Catovsky2.
Abstract
Historically, an increase in the percentage and number of circulating prolymphocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has been associated with strong expression of surface immunoglobulin, trisomy 12 and a poor outcome. This study re-examines the biological and clinical significance of increased peripheral blood prolymphocytes in 508 patients at entry into the randomized UK Leukaemia Research Fund CLL4 trial. It also investigates the associations between increased prolymphocytes and a comprehensive array of biomarkers. 270 patients (53%) had <5% prolymphocytes, 167 (33%) had 5-9%, 60 (12%) had 10-14% and 11 (2%) had ≥15% prolymphocytes. We show that a higher proportion of prolymphocytes (≥10%) was independently associated with NOTCH1 mutations (P = 0·006), absence of 13q deletion (P = 0·001), high CD38 expression (P = 0·02) and unmutated IGHV genes (P = 0·01). Deaths due to Richter syndrome were significantly more common amongst patients who had ≥10% vs <10% prolymphocytes (13% vs 2%) respectively (P < 0·0001). ≥10% prolymphocytes was also associated with a shorter progression-free survival (Hazard ratio [HR] 1·50 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·16-1·93], P = 0·002) and overall survival (HR 1·99 [95% CI: 1·53-2·59], P < 0·0001). Our data support the routine examination of blood films in CLL and suggest that a finding of an increased proportion of prolymphocytes may be a trigger for further evaluation of clinical and laboratory features of progressive disease.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; molecular markers; morphology; prognostic markers; prolymphocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27151266 PMCID: PMC4995732 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998
Figure 1Morphological appearances of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and CLL with >10% circulating prolymphocytes (CLL/PL). (A) Typical CLL. The majority of cells are small with clumped chromatin. (B) Typical CLL/PL. There is a mixture of prolymphocytes and typical CLL lymphocytes. (C) Typical CLL/PL showing small lymphocytes, prolymphocytes and an immunoblast. (D) Typical B‐cell prolymphocytic leukaemia (B‐PLL). The majority of cells have condensed non‐clumped chromatin and a single vesicular nucleolus. This panel is shown here for comparative purposes only, to illustrate the similar morphology of the prolymphocytes in B‐PLL to those seen in panels B and C. The majority of cells in B‐PLL are prolymphocytes and no small lymphocytes are seen. The usual “CLL score” is 0–1. B‐PLL is a distinct disorder and does not arise from a pre‐existing CLL. Magnification: panels A, B and C ×100; panel D ×60.
The association between the proportion of prolymphocytes and the CLL score components (atypical phenotypes are shown in bold)
| CLL score component | Patients ( | ≥10% prolymphocytes (%) | ≥15% prolymphocytes (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMC7 negative | 403 | 59 (15) | 7 (2) | NS |
|
|
|
|
| |
| SmIg weak | 371 | 37 (10) | 5 (1) | <0·0001 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| CD23 positive | 462 | 67 (14·5) | 10 (2) | NS |
|
|
|
|
| |
| CD79b weak | 437 | 59 (13·5) | 9 (2) | NS |
|
|
|
|
| |
| CD5 positive | 490 | 69 (14) | 10 (2) | NS |
|
|
|
|
|
CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
When CD5‐negative and CD23‐negative cases are excluded, the relationship between surface immunoglobulin (SmIg) expression and ≥10% proplymphocytes remains (10% weak vs 27% strong; P < 0·0001).
The association of baseline demographic and molecular categorical variables with % prolymphocytes (cut‐off 10%)
| Variable | Assessable patients ( | ≥10% prolymphocytes (%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized first‐line treatment | Chlorambucil | 256 | 34 (13) | NS |
| Fludarabine | 127 | 22 (17) | ||
| FC | 125 | 15 (12) | ||
| Gender | Female | 137 | 11 (8) | 0·02 |
| Male | 371 | 60 (16) | ||
| Age group (years) | <60 | 154 | 20 (13) | NS |
| 60–69 | 201 | 26 (13) | ||
| 70+ | 153 | 25 (16) | ||
| Disease stage (Binet) | A progressive | 139 | 18 (13) | NS |
| B | 216 | 35 (16) | ||
| C | 153 | 18 (12) | ||
| Splenomegaly | No | 221 | 26 (12) | NS |
| Yes | 287 | 45 (16) | ||
| Lymphadenopathy | No | 85 | 12 (14) | NS |
| Yes | 423 | 59 (14) | ||
| White blood cell count (cut‐off 100 × 109/l) | Low | 256 | 26 (10) | 0·02 |
| High | 246 | 43 (17) | ||
|
| Mutated | 163 | 10 (6) | <0·0001 |
| Unmutated | 257 | 53 (21) | ||
| β‐2 microglobulin (cut‐off 4 mg/l | Low | 201 | 19 (9) | 0·004 |
| High | 169 | 34 (20) | ||
|
| No | 426 | 60 (14) | NS |
| Yes | 41 | 9 (22) | ||
| 11q deletion | No | 380 | 59 (16) | NS |
| Yes | 86 | 9 (10) | ||
| 13q deletion | No | 195 | 43 (22) | 0·0001 |
| Yes | 271 | 25 (9) | ||
| Trisomy 12 | No | 389 | 47 (12) | 0·0006 |
| Yes | 77 | 21 (27) | ||
|
| No | 327 | 39 (12) | <0·0001 |
| Yes | 39 | 16 (41) | ||
|
| No | 284 | 43 (15) | NS |
| Yes | 60 | 13 (22) | ||
|
| Low | 203 | 17 (8) | 0·0002 |
| High | 194 | 42 (22) | ||
| CD38 expression (cut‐off 7% | Negative | 163 | 5 (3) | <0·0001 |
| Positive | 257 | 54 (21) | ||
| ZAP70 expression (cut‐off 10% | Negative | 191 | 22 (12) | NS |
| Positive | 179 | 31 (17) | ||
| Telomere length | Long | 79 | 4 (5) | 0·009 |
| Intermediate | 79 | 13 (16) | ||
| Short | 146 | 30 (21) | ||
| Absolute prolymphocyte count ≥15 × 109/l | No | 442 | 33 (7) | <0·0001 |
| Yes | 62 | 36 (58) | ||
FC, fludarabine with cyclophosphamide.
Oscier et al (2010)
Gonzalez et al (2013); RQ – real time relative quantification
Cut‐offs defined in Strefford et al (2015)
Chi‐squared test.
≥15% vs <15% prolymphocytes also significant: Notch1 P = 0·002; absolute prolymphocyte count P < 0·0001
Included in multivariate analysis
Variables associated with ≥10% prolymphocytes in multivariate analysis
| Variable | Odds Ratio | Lower 95% CL | Upper 95% CL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.88 | 1.46 | 10.30 | 0.006 |
| Absence of 13q deletion | 4.41 | 1.82 | 10.69 | 0.001 |
| Positive CD38 expression | 6.48 | 1.44 | 29.25 | 0.02 |
| Unmutated | 5.02 | 1.39 | 18.17 | 0.01 |
CL, confidence limit.
Figure 2Survival (A) Progression‐free survival by <10% vs ≥10% prolymphocytes. (B) Progression‐free survival by absolute prolymphocyte count. (C) Overall survival by <10% vs ≥10% prolymphocytes (D) Overall survival by absolute prolymphocyte count.
Figure 3Determining the optimum cut‐off for % prolymphocytes. (A) Progression‐free survival by % prolymphocytes. (B) Overall survival by % prolymphocytes.