Literature DB >> 27150650

Aneurysm Location as a Prognostic Outcome Factor After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage From Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms and Potential Impact for Further Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Models.

Juergen Konczalla1, Nina Brawanski2, Johannes Platz1, Christian Senft1, Sepide Kashefiolasl1, Volker Seifert1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prognostic factors of favorable and unfavorable clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are still not completely known. We retrospectively analyzed the aneurysm location as a factor for patients' outcome after aneurysmal SAH.
METHODS: We retrospectively selected patients from our prospectively collected database with aneurysm at the carotid bifurcation artery (n = 23) and posterior communicating artery (n = 170). Outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (favorable [mRS score, 0-2] vs. unfavorable [mRS score, 3-6]) 6 months after SAH.
RESULTS: A good clinical admission status (World Federation of Neurological Surgery grade I-III) has a significant influence on mRS score after SAH. In univariate analysis, advanced age, Fisher grade 3, early hydrocephalus, severity of cerebral vasospasm (CVS), longer stay on the intensive care unit, and posterior communicating artery aneurysms were associated with an unfavorable outcome. Multivariate analysis showed 4 prognostic factors for a favorable outcome: good admission status (odds ratio [OR], 10.8); aneurysms of carotid bifurcation artery (OR, 4.3); absence of mild or severe CVS (OR, 3.4); and patients age less than 55 years (OR, 2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the usual prognostic factors (good admission status, younger age, absence of CVS) for a favorable outcome after SAH, the aneurysm location (carotid bifurcation artery) itself seems to be a prognostic factor. Also, aneurysms of the carotid bifurcation artery showed less occurrence of an early hydrocephalus, which is an indicator for the presence of an early brain injury. According to these results, we question if experimental animal models (especially the endovascular model using the perforation of the carotid bifurcation artery) have to be re-evaluated.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm location; Early brain injury; Internal carotid artery; Outcome; Prognostic factor; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Translational research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27150650     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.210


  3 in total

1.  Does aneurysm side influence the infarction side and patients´ outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage?

Authors:  Nina Brawanski; Sepide Kashefiolasl; Sae-Yeon Won; Stephanie Tritt; Joachim Berkefeld; Christian Senft; Volker Seifert; Jürgen Konczalla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Aneurysm Location Affects Clinical Course and Mortality in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jennifer Göttsche; Andras Piffko; Tobias F Pantel; Manfred Westphal; Lasse Dührsen; Patrick Czorlich; Thomas Sauvigny
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Effect of stress-induced hyperglycemia after non-traumatic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage on clinical complications and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Zeyu Zhang; Yue Zhao; Yibo Liu; Xiaoyu Wang; Houshi Xu; Yuanjian Fang; Anke Zhang; Cameron Lenahan; Yujie Luo; Sheng Chen
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.035

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.