Eliane Siebor1, Claire de Curraize1, Lucie Amoureux1, Catherine Neuwirth2. 1. Laboratory of Bacteriology, University Hospital of Dijon, Plateau technique de Biologie, BP 37013, 21070 Dijon cedex, France. 2. Laboratory of Bacteriology, University Hospital of Dijon, Plateau technique de Biologie, BP 37013, 21070 Dijon cedex, France catherine.neuwirth@chu-dijon.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to transfer the Salmonella genomic islands (GIs) SGI1 and SGI1-V and the Proteus GI PGI1-PmESC to clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae harbouring an A/C2 plasmid. METHODS: The entire genetic structures of SGI1 and PGI1-PmESC from Salmonella Typhimurium and Proteus mirabilis, respectively, were characterized by PCR and DNA sequencing. Ten enterobacterial isolates from different species carrying blaTEM-24 on an A/C2 plasmid were used for the mobilization of SGI1: Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus vulgaris, Providencia stuartii and Serratia marcescens. SGI1-V and PGI1-PmESC were transferred to E. aerogenes. Conjugation attempts were also performed using the wild strain E. aerogenes BOL and E. coli K-12 with or without pA/C2. Detection and location of the GI in the transconjugants were assessed by PCR targeting their junctions. RESULTS: The multidrug resistance region of PGI1-PmESC contained a class 1 integron (aadB and aadA2) and regions deriving from transposon Tn501 and a hybrid Tn502/Tn5053 transposon, whereas SGI1 harboured the known determinants responsible for the pentaresistance. The transfer of SGI1 occurred from Salmonella Typhimurium to the 10 enterobacterial isolates, and transfer of SGI1-V and PGI1-PmESC occurred from P. mirabilis to E. aerogenes. In all transconjugants the GI was located at the 3'-end of trmE. SGI1 was also transferred to E. aerogenes BOL (pA/C2) and E. coli K-12 (pA/C2), but not to E. aerogenes BOL and E. coli K-12. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known description of SGI1 mobilization into a broad range of enterobacterial species harbouring an A/C2 plasmid and the first demonstration of PGI1 movement. The A/C2 plasmid is responsible for the GI mobilization.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to transfer the Salmonella genomic islands (GIs) SGI1 and SGI1-V and the Proteus GI PGI1-PmESC to clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae harbouring an A/C2 plasmid. METHODS: The entire genetic structures of SGI1 and PGI1-PmESC from Salmonella Typhimurium and Proteus mirabilis, respectively, were characterized by PCR and DNA sequencing. Ten enterobacterial isolates from different species carrying blaTEM-24 on an A/C2 plasmid were used for the mobilization of SGI1: Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus vulgaris, Providencia stuartii and Serratia marcescens. SGI1-V and PGI1-PmESC were transferred to E. aerogenes. Conjugation attempts were also performed using the wild strain E. aerogenes BOL and E. coli K-12 with or without pA/C2. Detection and location of the GI in the transconjugants were assessed by PCR targeting their junctions. RESULTS: The multidrug resistance region of PGI1-PmESC contained a class 1 integron (aadB and aadA2) and regions deriving from transposon Tn501 and a hybrid Tn502/Tn5053 transposon, whereas SGI1 harboured the known determinants responsible for the pentaresistance. The transfer of SGI1 occurred from Salmonella Typhimurium to the 10 enterobacterial isolates, and transfer of SGI1-V and PGI1-PmESC occurred from P. mirabilis to E. aerogenes. In all transconjugants the GI was located at the 3'-end of trmE. SGI1 was also transferred to E. aerogenes BOL (pA/C2) and E. coli K-12 (pA/C2), but not to E. aerogenes BOL and E. coli K-12. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known description of SGI1 mobilization into a broad range of enterobacterial species harbouring an A/C2 plasmid and the first demonstration of PGI1 movement. The A/C2 plasmid is responsible for the GI mobilization.
Authors: Max Laurence Cummins; Piklu Roy Chowdhury; Marc Serge Marenda; Glenn Francis Browning; Steven Philip Djordjevic Journal: mSphere Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 4.389