Literature DB >> 27149962

Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study.

Susan C Slade1, Clermont E Dionne2, Martin Underwood3, Rachelle Buchbinder4, Belinda Beck5, Kim Bennell6, Lucie Brosseau7, Leonardo Costa8, Fiona Cramp9, Edith Cup10, Lynne Feehan11, Manuela Ferreira12, Scott Forbes13, Paul Glasziou14, Bas Habets15, Susan Harris16, Jean Hay-Smith17, Susan Hillier18, Rana Hinman19, Ann Holland20, Maria Hondras21, George Kelly22, Peter Kent23, Gert-Jan Lauret24, Audrey Long25, Chris Maher26, Lars Morso27, Nina Osteras28, Tom Peterson29, Ros Quinlivan30, Karen Rees31, Jean-Philippe Regnaux32, Marc Rietberg33, Dave Saunders34, Nicole Skoetz35, Karen Sogaard36, Tim Takken37, Maurits van Tulder38, Nicoline Voet39, Lesley Ward40, Claire White41.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise interventions are often incompletely described in reports of clinical trials, hampering evaluation of results and replication and implementation into practice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a standardized method for reporting exercise programs in clinical trials: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the EQUATOR Network's methodological framework, 137 exercise experts were invited to participate in a Delphi consensus study. A list of 41 items was identified from a meta-epidemiologic study of 73 systematic reviews of exercise. For each item, participants indicated agreement on an 11-point rating scale. Consensus for item inclusion was defined a priori as greater than 70% agreement of respondents rating an item 7 or above. Three sequential rounds of anonymous online questionnaires and a Delphi workshop were used.
RESULTS: There were 57 (response rate=42%), 54 (response rate=95%), and 49 (response rate=91%) respondents to rounds 1 through 3, respectively, from 11 countries and a range of disciplines. In round 1, 2 items were excluded; 24 items reached consensus for inclusion (8 items accepted in original format), and 16 items were revised in response to participant suggestions. Of 14 items in round 2, 3 were excluded, 11 reached consensus for inclusion (4 items accepted in original format), and 7 were reworded. Sixteen items were included in round 3, and all items reached greater than 70% consensus for inclusion. LIMITATIONS: The views of included Delphi panelists may differ from those of experts who declined participation and may not fully represent the views of all exercise experts.
CONCLUSIONS: The CERT, a 16-item checklist developed by an international panel of exercise experts, is designed to improve the reporting of exercise programs in all evaluative study designs and contains 7 categories: materials, provider, delivery, location, dosage, tailoring, and compliance. The CERT will encourage transparency, improve trial interpretation and replication, and facilitate implementation of effective exercise interventions into practice.
© 2016 American Physical Therapy Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27149962     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  89 in total

1.  Evidence synthesis of types and intensity of therapeutic land-based exercises to reduce pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Aline Mizusaki Imoto; Jordi Pardo Pardo; Lucie Brosseau; Jade Taki; Brigit Desjardins; Odette Thevenot; Eduardo Franco; Stella Peccin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  IMPROVING THE REPORTING OF THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE INTERVENTIONS IN REHABILITATION RESEARCH.

Authors:  Phil Page; Barb Hoogenboom; Michael Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

3.  Dopaminergic therapy and prefrontal activation during walking in individuals with Parkinson's disease: does the levodopa overdose hypothesis extend to gait?

Authors:  Moria Dagan; Talia Herman; Hagar Bernad-Elazari; Eran Gazit; Inbal Maidan; Nir Giladi; Anat Mirelman; Brad Manor; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Standards of reporting: the use of CONSORT PRO and CERT in individuals living with osteoporosis.

Authors:  D E Mack; P M Wilson; E Santos; K Brooks
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Implementation Science.

Authors:  Louise Czosnek; Nicole Rankin; Eva Zopf; Justin Richards; Simon Rosenbaum; Prue Cormie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Physical fitness interventions for nonambulatory stroke survivors: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megan Lloyd; Dawn A Skelton; Gillian E Mead; Brian Williams; Frederike van Wijck
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Exercise for people with a fragility fracture of the pelvis or lower limb: a systematic review of interventions evaluated in clinical trials and reporting quality.

Authors:  David J Keene; Colin Forde; Thavapriya Sugavanam; Mark A Williams; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Yoga for Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Romy Lauche; David J Hunter; Jon Adams; Holger Cramer
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Why past research successes do not translate to clinical reality: gaps in evidence on exercise program efficacy.

Authors:  E Losina
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Effect of Isometric Resistance Training on Blood Pressure Values in a Group of Normotensive Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrés F Loaiza-Betancur; Edison Pérez Bedoya; Jeison Montoya Dávila; Iván Chulvi-Medrano
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.